boatsnguitars wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:14 am
TRANSPONDER wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:56 pm
Free will, and God does not wants robots.
It is essential...Essential...that God does not reveal himself or His Word so reliably and undeniably that people cannot doubt and question (even though Christian apologetics claims that the evidence is plain and only the choice to be anti God can explain why some choose not to believe). Of course this just looks to we Goddless Unbelievers like excuses as to why things are like This when by all reason, they ought to be like That.
Why? "God has his reasons; God knows best; it makes sense to God if not to us". That's the bottom line and go -to excuse and all that we can do is buy it or not,
Yep. But it's interesting. God can't let us know he exists - except he makes it very apparent to the fanatics that he does. They are positive God exists - and ironically, they're the ones causing the most trouble.
It seems, honestly, that Believers got together and said, "Hey, let's create a group that makes all the rules - and how we'll convince everyone to follow us is that we'll claim there a Big Daddy with a real nasty temper who will spank them if they don't listen to us. If they say they can't see any evidence for Big Daddy, we'll tell them it's their fault!"
Then, they act as robots - trying to do everything their religion tells them.
I agree. I see religion as a survival instinct. Tribal cohesion and self -confidence. And nowhere is that seen better than is Judaism, designed (so far as I can see) to keep Israel different and separate from all the other nations. I also see that is basic to the Abrhamic and notably the Greco -Roman religion was very yolerant. Which rather led to it becoming discarded in favor of cults like Attis, Mithras, Isis and Christianity. The State religion was more political loyalty to Rome and the Emperor than life -changing Faith, as the Cult of Cybele was.
You are right about cult -think, and I have mentioned before that I found that the UFO creed argued just the same way as Bible apologetics. It is actually human self -justification with personal self -worth at stake, not the search for what's so. To do that latter requires critical thinking which more claim to do than actally do.
"Not all who cry Logic, Logic will attain to doing it logically."
Trust me, U have done trying to win as well as trying to find out. It was atheism that taught me about critical thinking, because nobody else teaches it, or Authorities would be facing tougher questions and the hate cults of Woke vs Maga would never have got started.
And you are right in the first. Apologists want to claim that God is plainly visible for the purposes of Faith, but is by design, requirement and intent Not visible when it comes to providing evidence. In fact...Is this circular?
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
God can't show he exists because it should be based on Faith, not knowledge, so the evidence that God exists is purely based on Faith which is by Dogma not based on sufficient evidence. I mean, not the claims of the past, which we have reason to doubt, anyway, but the 'Watchmaker' evidence (which is garbage) experience in life (which is trash) and "I know because I know because I know" which is Faith, and no good reason for believing anything.