1213 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 23, 2022 7:34 am
The Nice Centurion wrote: ↑Fri Sep 23, 2022 6:44 am
1213 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:45 am
Tcg wrote: ↑Sun Aug 14, 2022 11:53 pm
...Would these arguments be needed if Paul is right in his claim from Romans 1?
It depends on the situation. By what I know, the arguments are usually because someone asks them.
I believe all people know deep inside of them that God is real. And I think knowledge of God's existence is not very relevant, crucial thing is, does person understand what is good and right and does he want to live accordingly. Eternal life is promised for righteous, not for those who know God is real.
You believe that God is one. You do well. The demons also believe, and shudder.
James 2:19
These will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.
Mat. 25:46
For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Romans 6:23
Hm-but you believe that all people think god real.
Sorry, I was not accurate enough in that post, I meant, eternal life is not because person knows God is real.
Ok. But clarifying faithclaims is not the primary question, but which claims we should believe - Paul's or the 'philosophers'. Which really means the Bible or science, because Philosophy has always been trying to work out logical exp[lanation based in the knowledge of the time and when science finds out that instinct and morals are biological rather than God - given, Philosophy has to shuffle bit to catch up. Religion shuffled much more reluctantly, but shuffle it does.
To reiterate the point of the op, then, Paul was appealing to ID and he was wrong; the universe, world and life shew forth the glory of materialist science and not (on any evidence yet presented) of a god
Name you own, anyway. Paul is wrong, and the Philosophers (or rather the Science that puts them straight) are right.