Is altruism impossible?

For the love of the pursuit of knowledge

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Evales
Scholar
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 7:10 am
Location: Australia

Is altruism impossible?

Post #1

Post by Evales »

Is it possible?

User avatar
OnceConvinced
Savant
Posts: 8969
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: New Zealand
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 67 times
Contact:

Post #21

Post by OnceConvinced »

How about this scenario.

Travelling to home each night from work I take a particular route. I found that a work colleague, someone I bearly know lives on that route but catches two buses to get there. It was no problem for me to drop him off each night, so I made the offer. I did not consider him a friend at the time, nor did I feel any sense of satisfaction for doing it. It really was no big deal. I also did not do it to gain a friend. Nor did I ask for any money, nor do I expect any. I simply do it because of empathy - I have been in that situation myself and I know how much time I wasted sitting around waiting for buses and sitting in buses.

So is this selfish?

Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.

Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.

There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.


Check out my website: Recker's World

Thought Criminal
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1081
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:05 pm

Post #22

Post by Thought Criminal »

OnceConvinced wrote:How about this scenario.

Travelling to home each night from work I take a particular route. I found that a work colleague, someone I bearly know lives on that route but catches two buses to get there. It was no problem for me to drop him off each night, so I made the offer. I did not consider him a friend at the time, nor did I feel any sense of satisfaction for doing it. It really was no big deal. I also did not do it to gain a friend. Nor did I ask for any money, nor do I expect any. I simply do it because of empathy - I have been in that situation myself and I know how much time I wasted sitting around waiting for buses and sitting in buses.

So is this selfish?
Not in any meaningful sense of the word, no.

TC

byofrcs

Post #23

Post by byofrcs »

OnceConvinced wrote:How about this scenario.

Travelling to home each night from work I take a particular route. I found that a work colleague, someone I bearly know lives on that route but catches two buses to get there. It was no problem for me to drop him off each night, so I made the offer. I did not consider him a friend at the time, nor did I feel any sense of satisfaction for doing it. It really was no big deal. I also did not do it to gain a friend. Nor did I ask for any money, nor do I expect any. I simply do it because of empathy - I have been in that situation myself and I know how much time I wasted sitting around waiting for buses and sitting in buses.

So is this selfish?
I read on the bus. If I was picked up then it would probably be seen as selfish (or rude) if I read in your car (The exception is when its a limo then its OK to read).

Is it therefore selfish that I want to read on the bus and so don't take up your offer ? Selfish is a hard concept to pin down.

User avatar
justifyothers
Site Supporter
Posts: 1764
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Virginia, US
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #24

Post by justifyothers »

Maybe we should look at selfishness in terms of motivation.

If a good deed is done because it will make me feel good, this could be considered selfish. Yes, the good still gets done, but my motivation was myself first.

If a good deed is done for the actual desire to help another -before I consider how it may benefit me, then this could be considered unslefish. Some of our purest altruistic acts are knee-jerk reactions to another's need.

Sjoerd
Scholar
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:06 pm
Location: Utrecht, the Netherlands

Post #25

Post by Sjoerd »

justifyothers wrote:Maybe we should look at selfishness in terms of motivation.

If a good deed is done because it will make me feel good, this could be considered selfish. Yes, the good still gets done, but my motivation was myself first.

If a good deed is done for the actual desire to help another -before I consider how it may benefit me, then this could be considered unslefish. Some of our purest altruistic acts are knee-jerk reactions to another's need.
Indulging your desire to help another makes you feel good, that's the problem.
The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom.
No bird soars too high, if he soars with his own wings.
The nakedness of woman is the work of God.
Listen to the fool''''s reproach! it is a kingly title!
As the caterpiller chooses the fairest leaves to lay her eggs on, so the priest lays his curse on the fairest joys.

William Blake - The Marriage of Heaven and Hell

User avatar
justifyothers
Site Supporter
Posts: 1764
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Virginia, US
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #26

Post by justifyothers »

Sjoerd wrote:
justifyothers wrote:Maybe we should look at selfishness in terms of motivation.

If a good deed is done because it will make me feel good, this could be considered selfish. Yes, the good still gets done, but my motivation was myself first.

If a good deed is done for the actual desire to help another -before I consider how it may benefit me, then this could be considered unslefish. Some of our purest altruistic acts are knee-jerk reactions to another's need.
Indulging your desire to help another makes you feel good, that's the problem.
Indulging your desire to help another makes it possible.

There are cases in which people risk personal harm to help another. This transcends the 'feel good' theory.

Sjoerd
Scholar
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:06 pm
Location: Utrecht, the Netherlands

Post #27

Post by Sjoerd »

justifyothers wrote:
Indulging your desire to help another makes it possible.

There are cases in which people risk personal harm to help another. This transcends the 'feel good' theory.
Maybe this is a bit of masochism, but risking harm to help another could make me feel good too. At least, very righteous and proud of myself. And choosing to refrain from an action is also a choice. I could feel very bad if I would refrain from some altruistic actions: lose a lot of self-respect and self-esteem.

I think that we need to be critical of hypotheses on altruism that are too complex in terms of Theory of Mind. Animals participate in altruistic behaviour too. There is this story (from a professor of animal behaviour) of a bonobo who gave his life trying to save a young. The young was drowning, and the bonobo couldn't swim but he jumped in anyway.
The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom.
No bird soars too high, if he soars with his own wings.
The nakedness of woman is the work of God.
Listen to the fool''''s reproach! it is a kingly title!
As the caterpiller chooses the fairest leaves to lay her eggs on, so the priest lays his curse on the fairest joys.

William Blake - The Marriage of Heaven and Hell

User avatar
justifyothers
Site Supporter
Posts: 1764
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Virginia, US
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #28

Post by justifyothers »

Sjoerd wrote:
justifyothers wrote:
Indulging your desire to help another makes it possible.

There are cases in which people risk personal harm to help another. This transcends the 'feel good' theory.
Sjoerd wrote: Maybe this is a bit of masochism, but risking harm to help another could make me feel good too. At least, very righteous and proud of myself. And choosing to refrain from an action is also a choice. I could feel very bad if I would refrain from some altruistic actions: lose a lot of self-respect and self-esteem.
It's mostly just honest.
But it does assume you'll have time to reflect on all these thoughts before you decide.
Sjoerd wrote: I think that we need to be critical of hypotheses on altruism that are too complex in terms of Theory of Mind. Animals participate in altruistic behaviour too. There is this story (from a professor of animal behaviour) of a bonobo who gave his life trying to save a young. The young was drowning, and the bonobo couldn't swim but he jumped in anyway.
I know what you're saying. I've heard these same type of stories from credible sources, and I believe them. However, we're never going to know what that bonobo (whatever that is) actually thought about prior to the act of jumping in. I know a strong survival instinct for the group is usually used to explain acts like this. Are you saying it's more than that or that no true act of altruism is possible?

Sjoerd
Scholar
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:06 pm
Location: Utrecht, the Netherlands

Post #29

Post by Sjoerd »

justifyothers wrote: It's mostly just honest.
Thanks :D
justifyothers wrote: But it does assume you'll have time to reflect on all these thoughts before you decide.
True. Let's hope that I have done all the thinking now and that when I decide, I will do the right thing automatically ;)
justifyothers wrote:
Sjoerd wrote: I think that we need to be critical of hypotheses on altruism that are too complex in terms of Theory of Mind. Animals participate in altruistic behaviour too. There is this story (from a professor of animal behaviour) of a bonobo who gave his life trying to save a young. The young was drowning, and the bonobo couldn't swim but he jumped in anyway.
I know what you're saying. I've heard these same type of stories from credible sources, and I believe them. However, we're never going to know what that bonobo (whatever that is) actually thought about prior to the act of jumping in. I know a strong survival instinct for the group is usually used to explain acts like this. Are you saying it's more than that or that no true act of altruism is possible?
I mean that I believe it to be dangerous to discriminate between "selfish" feel-good altruism, based on instinct, and "genuine" altruism, based on morality. The bonobo's altruism is as genuine as it can be (he gave his life), still I would hesitate to assign human morality to an animal. I would say that "because it feels good" is enough reason for any altruistic action. You can then ask "why does it feel good?" and obtain reasons such as basic social behaviour, evolutionary instincts and/or higher morality.
justifyothers wrote: bonobo (whatever that is)
Are you sure that you want to know? They are held in very few zoos not to offend the more sensitive part of the public. :eyebrow:
The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom.
No bird soars too high, if he soars with his own wings.
The nakedness of woman is the work of God.
Listen to the fool''''s reproach! it is a kingly title!
As the caterpiller chooses the fairest leaves to lay her eggs on, so the priest lays his curse on the fairest joys.

William Blake - The Marriage of Heaven and Hell

User avatar
justifyothers
Site Supporter
Posts: 1764
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Virginia, US
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #30

Post by justifyothers »

Sjoerd wrote: True. Let's hope that I have done all the thinking now and that when I decide, I will do the right thing automatically ;)
Same here, but there's always that knee-jerk thing :-)

Sjoerd wrote:
I mean that I believe it to be dangerous to discriminate between "selfish" feel-good altruism, based on instinct, and "genuine" altruism, based on morality. The bonobo's altruism is as genuine as it can be (he gave his life), still I would hesitate to assign human morality to an animal. I would say that "because it feels good" is enough reason for any altruistic action. You can then ask "why does it feel good?" and obtain reasons such as basic social behaviour, evolutionary instincts and/or higher morality.
Couldn't agree more (how refreshing)
justifyothers wrote: bonobo (whatever that is)
Sjoerd wrote:
Are you sure that you want to know? They are held in very few zoos not to offend the more sensitive part of the public. :eyebrow:
Well, now I must know!! Haven't looked it up - I'm assuming it's some kind of crazy monkey :yikes:

Post Reply