God's Need for Loyalty?

[Skeptical]

I know that it has been argued and debated that God had to test Adam and Eve in order to see if they were loyal to him or not, but could the human race have gotten along alright if God didn't have the need to know what their loyalty was? Because it still hasn't been adequately explained as to why God needed to be sure of the first human pair's loyalty. However, it has only been dogmatically said that this is what God wanted. Therefore, could humankind had still been successful without a test of loyalty to God, or is this something that God needed to make himself feel more secure? Inquiring minds want to know.

[JehovahsWitness]

So, is that all? Just no?

No, ... I am not saying that James 1:14-15 contradicts 2 Corinthians 11:3. I don't see anything contradictory in the two verses.

[JehovahsWitness]

[Skeptical]

[Skeptical]

... that no matter what you say and no matter how you reason and no matter what scriptures that you use, JWs are still always right just because?

No. I didn't say that : which post contains me saying any of that?

You don't need to come right out and say that.

[JehovahsWitness]

I noticed that you ignored what I said about Matthew 4:1-12 in my post #52:

I responded to post #52 in post #54.

[JehovahsWitness]

However, if my arguments are too much for you, we don't have to continue to debate.

No I want to continue the debate.

[otseng]

Dude, I almost belted out a big yawn. Because it sounds like you are not keeping up. However, you are free to read my post again and see if you are able to get the real meaning of what I said.

Or maybe you don't understand sarcasm. smh

ave adult conversations; however, your answers are becoming very childish and disingenuous. Therefore, debating with you is a waste of time. So, if you don't mind, could you not answer my questions at this forum?

Moderator Comment

Please debate without making personal comments about others.

Please review the Rules.





______________



Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

[Skeptical]

Dude, I almost belted out a big yawn. Because it sounds like you are not keeping up. However, you are free to read my post again and see if you are able to get the real meaning of what I said.

Or maybe you don't understand sarcasm. smh

ave adult conversations; however, your answers are becoming very childish and disingenuous. Therefore, debating with you is a waste of time. So, if you don't mind, could you not answer my questions at this forum?

Moderator Comment

Please debate without making personal comments about others.

Please review the Rules.





______________



Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

But if you look, I said that "your answers (or his arguments) are becoming very childish and disingenuous," but not the person himself.

[Skeptical]

[JehovahsWitness]