I was conceding an argument. I could have instead said, "Point taken. You win. I was wrong. I concede." That would have been puffing, not useful, non-productive, a waste of pixels and time.
I think conceding a line of argument should be possible. We needn't leave people up in the air as to whether their case has been read and understood. But we shouldn't be required to put our concessions into a minimum number of lines.
-
On the other hand, the chastisement was just a moderator comment, barely a wrist slap. So I don't want to put anybody to the work of researching the situation, inventing a new rule, hashing out differences of opinions backstage, and publicly announcing a tweak, just to come up with a slightly modified rule that someone else will challenge.
Tell you what, then: I'll be happy if a moderator posts a one-line response, something like, "There may be something in what you say."

Relevant link: http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 783&lofi=1
(I don't know how to link an individual post.)