Farenheit 9/11

[NuclearTBag]

Last week Michalel Moore's documentary debuted ant #1 in the box office, will it make much of a diffrence, will it make any diffrence, can it change your mind?

[Angry McFurious]

A difference in what? The thing about M. Moore's movies is when he was talking to someone he who cart parts to there responces out making them look worse then they really are. Also he is leaning toward the Liberal/Democrats point of view so it's not a neutral way to look at the current statis of the Bush Admin. Most have not taking kind to this movie. I forgot the name of the lady who was talking about it in Las Vegas and they boo'd her off the stage and she had to be escorted out. Sure some did agree with 100% of the movie (liberal) but I don;t think it was enough to change you stance on the majority of the issues. His movie Bowling for Columbine was better in my opinion. Now after seeing how M. Moore editied and cut out parts of the responces of some of the men he talked to I kind of lost respect for him since he can;t make a movie to prove his point w/ out making other people look bad.

There might be a bunch of mistakes in grammer in this but I just pulled 10 hours at work lol. Cut me some slack!!!

[perspective]

Now after seeing how M. Moore editied and cut out parts of the responces of some of the men he talked to I kind of lost respect for him since he can;t make a movie to prove his point w/ out making other people look bad.

If only you were so harsh to judge the news stations who feed you this kind of editted crap every day. Examples here

While Michael Moore's documentary might have a very biased edge to it, all of that thunder could have been intercepted by unbiased news reporting during the earlier Bush administrative years.
The republicans and news stations have no one to blame but themselves for the interest the public has taken in this film.

[Angry McFurious]

Now after seeing how M. Moore editied and cut out parts of the responces of some of the men he talked to I kind of lost respect for him since he can;t make a movie to prove his point w/ out making other people look bad.

If only you were so harsh to judge the news stations who feed you this kind of editted crap every day. Examples here

While Michael Moore's documentary might have a very biased edge to it, all of that thunder could have been intercepted by unbiased news reporting during the earlier Bush administrative years.
The republicans and news stations have no one to blame but themselves for the interest the public has taken in this film.

Yes but it was a MOVIE that almost everyone saw, not some local news station like many of these examples are. I'm sorry aren;t the liberals the one kept saying they would not have supported this war if they new the correct information? Democrats... only sticking up for what they later realised.. they should of believed in. Your liberal girly boys were in these war too.

Ok so everyone had there foot in this. You know there is a bill that states after 90 days if congress HAS NOT declared war troops must be withdrawn which they WERE NOT (troops sent under order of the president). Congress has not declared war since WWII this could have been stopped since it went on past 90 days.

And anyway once again I state.. HE CAN'T MAKE A MOVIE TO SUPPORT HIS POINT OF VIEW W/OUT MAKING PEOPLE LOOK BAD.

I don;t support the War in Iraq since there were almost no terrorist but now because of US envolvement, a few groups have flocked there. You know Pakastan sold materials to every country in the area BUT IRAQ and we didn;t stop them.

If we should have been anywhere stopping nuclear bombs at the time it needed to be korea.

I never supported this war so don;t act like I'm so dumb ass extreme right wing because I don;t support the Bush admin.

I simply think M. Moore is a freakin' retard.

[perspective]

Yes but it was a MOVIE that almost everyone saw, not some local news station like many of these examples are.

I'm sorry, maybe I missed your facts where you backed up the assertion thatt everyone has seen this movie. But this is General Chat, so you don't have to back it up. I won't debate, I'll just disagree with your premise here. My understanding was that it's only being shown in 868 screens. That's out of almost 36,000 screens. I'd hardly call that wide exposure.

aren;t the liberals the one kept saying they would not have supported this war if they new the correct information? Democrats... only sticking up for what they later realised.. they should of believed in. Your liberal girly boys were in these war too.

I don't know who this is directed at. Any soldier who fights for his country is obviously way above your insults. Your grammar is severly hurting your communication here at this forum. I'm not even sure what exactly your sentences mean most of the time, I have to quess. I hope I guessed your meaning correctly here.

[Angry McFurious]

Ok where did I insult any person fighting?? Do you even know what the hell slander is?

[perspective]

Ok where did I insult any person fighting?? Do you even know what the hell slander is?

As I stated above, I'm not really sure what this sentence means because this isn't the English grammar, spelling, and punctuation that I learned in school:

aren;t the liberals the one kept saying they would not have supported this war if they new the correct information? Democrats... only sticking up for what they later realised.. they should of believed in. Your liberal girly boys were in these war too.

I'll translate this the way I interpreted and see if you can see why I might have thought you were slamming the troops:

Aren't the liberals the ones who keep saying that they would not have supported this war if they knew the correct information? Democrats criticize in hindsight what they should have believed in (what does that mean?). Your liberal girly boys are fighting over seas too.


That was my interpretation. I don't really know what the tirade was about specifically - all I saw was the last sentence that stated some in war are girly boys. I don't believe that any who go to war and put themselves in harm's way are girly boys. I won't even go into the issue that most of the girls I know are tougher than many men I know, so calling someone a "girly boy" isn't only ignorant but also juvenile.

It's a shame that your spell checker doesn't work. You should ask Otseng if he has any ideas on how to get that working for you. It would make life easier on the rest of us.

[otseng]

It's a shame that your spell checker doesn't work. You should ask Otseng if he has any ideas on how to get that working for you. It would make life easier on the rest of us.

Do you have a popup blocker? If so, that's probably stopping you from using the spellcheck button. Perhaps you can disable the popup blocker for this site.

[Corvus]

It's a shame that your spell checker doesn't work. You should ask Otseng if he has any ideas on how to get that working for you. It would make life easier on the rest of us.

But a spelling check does not correct grammar. Angry McFurious, I recommend typing your posts into a Microsoft Word document, which has an auto spell and grammar check, and then transferring them to the forum. It may take longer, but at present your messages are very difficult to understand.

[Spongemom]

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/video1035.htm

Download Fahrenheit 9/11 free for a limited time only.