Are Bad Apples Indicative of a Wrong Ideology?
Moderator: Moderators
- harvey1
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 2:09 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
Are Bad Apples Indicative of a Wrong Ideology?
Post #1A recent comment I read said that the U.S. didn't do much in WWII made me ponder whether ideology is really to blame in coming to such addled beliefs. I realize that there's bad apples in every bunch, but at the same time, we can't overlook the affect ideology has on making an otherwise intelligent person into a maladroit thinker. So, my question is, at what point do we consider a "bad apple" (i.e., defective thinker) as indicative of the ideology? For example, does anyone think that certain extreme Islamic fundamentalists are not affected by their ideology being pernicious? It seems that at some point we must look at bad apples as indicative of the philosophies they hold. Can we rule out some forms of atheism for this reason?
People say of the last day, that God shall give judgment. This is true. But it is not true as people imagine. Every man pronounces his own sentence; as he shows himself here in his essence, so will he remain everlastingly -- Meister Eckhart
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Post #2
Does Bush's invasion of Iraq invalidate the concept of elected representative democracy?
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
- Cathar1950
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 10503
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:12 pm
- Location: Michigan(616)
- Been thanked: 2 times
Post #3
No one is wrong all the time are they? Is everyone wrong all the time in the group?
Should we say theism is wrong because their are many pernicious, maladroit thinkers that are theist including fundamentalist?
Should that make up rule out theism?
Should we say theism is wrong because their are many pernicious, maladroit thinkers that are theist including fundamentalist?
Should that make up rule out theism?
I hope not. I hope he is not really representative of Americans.Does Bush's invasion of Iraq invalidate the concept of elected representative democracy?
- harvey1
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 2:09 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
Post #4
Yes, to a certain degree it does. It shows that the United States is very vunerable to dictatorship just like Gödel suggested.McCulloch wrote:Does Bush's invasion of Iraq invalidate the concept of elected representative democracy?
People say of the last day, that God shall give judgment. This is true. But it is not true as people imagine. Every man pronounces his own sentence; as he shows himself here in his essence, so will he remain everlastingly -- Meister Eckhart
- achilles12604
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 3697
- Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:37 am
- Location: Colorado
Post #5
Adolf Hitler's book Mein Kampf shows how a democracy can be subverted into a dictatorship over just a few years. The fact that the President can declare emergency actions without anyone else's consent is kind of scary. After all "emergency actions" is just another war. Remember the "police action" of Korea?harvey1 wrote:Yes, to a certain degree it does. It shows that the United States is very vunerable to dictatorship just like Gödel suggested.McCulloch wrote:Does Bush's invasion of Iraq invalidate the concept of elected representative democracy?
It is a first class human tragedy that people of the earth who claim to believe in the message of Jesus, whom they describe as the Prince of Peace, show little of that belief in actual practice.
Re: Are Bad Apples Indicative of a Wrong Ideology?
Post #6If bad apples are indicative of a wrong ideology, then no correct ideologies exist. To disprove this, show me a non-trivial ideology that has no bad apples associated with it.
Post #7
He is, he is chosen through a democratic process, end of story. But if you dont like that, perhaps you should change it?I hope not. I hope he is not really representative of Americans.
T: ´I do not believe in gravity, it´s just a theory.´
- Cathar1950
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 10503
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:12 pm
- Location: Michigan(616)
- Been thanked: 2 times
Post #8
I didn't vote for him. I voted for the other guy so I did my part. All I did is cancel out one republican vote. I did remind by kids to vote and they canceled out two more. My whole Family did their part. I am betting my ex voted against him also. I know a few people that didn't vote but would have voted for Bush and I am glad they didn't. He is a lame duck pres. now anyway. It is time we get over this mistake and move on to the next one.
- OccamsRazor
- Scholar
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:08 am
- Location: London, UK
Post #9
The idea that a bad apple may taint the ideaology as a whole seems ridiculous. This idea would be akin to judging the worth of an entire philosophy based on the misguided opinion of one person.
In addition there are also those who use an ideaology to further their own political agenda. This has been shown throughout history and is still rife today. Extreme Muslim clerics request that people commit atrocities largely because it suits their political agenda. Likewise George Bush suggests that military actions were motivated by God. This does not suggest that Christianity and Islam are to blame, rather that individuals are using these beliefs as tools in their politics.
In addition there are also those who use an ideaology to further their own political agenda. This has been shown throughout history and is still rife today. Extreme Muslim clerics request that people commit atrocities largely because it suits their political agenda. Likewise George Bush suggests that military actions were motivated by God. This does not suggest that Christianity and Islam are to blame, rather that individuals are using these beliefs as tools in their politics.
One should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything.