Here is a simple, yet powerful, argument against the idea that we 'freely' choose our actions.
1. Our thoughts determine our choices.
2. We do not freely choose our thoughts.
3. Therefore, our choices cannot be free.
I don't think anyone would object to premise 1, especially those who believe in free will, since by definition, a "free" choice, if it could exist, requires a person to consciously make it, which by definition involves thought. Premise 2 may be controversial to some, but with a simple thought experiment, it can be proven to be true. If a person could freely choose their thoughts, then they would have to be able to consciously choose what they were going to think before actually thinking it. In other words, there would have to be a time before a person thinks a thought that that thought was consciously chosen by a person, which literally entails the necessity of being able to think a thought before one thinks it. This, of course, is a logical contradiction. Ergo, free will does not exist.
Why 'Free Will' is Logically Impossible
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Student
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2020 8:00 pm
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 31 times
- otseng
- Savant
- Posts: 20566
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
- Contact:
Re: Why 'Free Will' is Logically Impossible
Post #311Moderator CommentKylie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 28, 2022 11:25 pm I have been abundantly clear and you seem to be intentionally obtuse. Do I need to draw a diagram? If so, I will use bright colours and small words so you can understand it. If you don't like it, then stop playing immature games like a child and answer the question.
Please debate without making personal comments about another.
Please review the Rules.
______________
Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2572 times
Re: Why 'Free Will' is Logically Impossible
Post #312Now I get why folks say "fundamental" reality, and not just "reality". I offer what retractions in any threads my new understanding calls me to fix.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
Re: Why 'Free Will' is Logically Impossible
Post #313They are not your thoughts.Rational Atheist wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 7:18 pm Here is a simple, yet powerful, argument against the idea that we 'freely' choose our actions.
1. Our thoughts determine our choices.
No one has their own thoughts.
They are put in your mind by another source.
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2572 times
Re: Why 'Free Will' is Logically Impossible
Post #314Is this some sort of ESP or such?
Of course the external can affect my thoughts, but it's me thinking em.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
Re: Why 'Free Will' is Logically Impossible
Post #315Try to control your thoughts.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 9:10 pmIs this some sort of ESP or such?
Of course the external can affect my thoughts, but it's me thinking em.
When you can't come back and tell me,
why you can't.
If they were your own thoughts,
then you would be able to think
the thoughts you want to think...
all the time.
But you can't. So you don't.
You think the thoughts that another source is
putting in your mind.
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2572 times
Re: Why 'Free Will' is Logically Impossible
Post #316Nice try tinfoil salesperson.OneWay wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 9:27 pmTry to control your thoughts.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 9:10 pmIs this some sort of ESP or such?
Of course the external can affect my thoughts, but it's me thinking em.
When you can't come back and tell me,
why you can't.
If they were your own thoughts,
then you would be able to think
the thoughts you want to think...
all the time.
But you can't. So you don't.
You think the thoughts that another source is
putting in your mind.
Seriously though, are you saying a specific entity is beaming waves into my brain? Or more generically, like when I think of some hot chick nekkid?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
Re: Why 'Free Will' is Logically Impossible
Post #317What do you mean nice try?JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 10:01 pmNice try tinfoil salesperson.OneWay wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 9:27 pmTry to control your thoughts.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 9:10 pmIs this some sort of ESP or such?
Of course the external can affect my thoughts, but it's me thinking em.
When you can't come back and tell me,
why you can't.
If they were your own thoughts,
then you would be able to think
the thoughts you want to think...
all the time.
But you can't. So you don't.
You think the thoughts that another source is
putting in your mind.
Seriously though, are you saying a specific entity is beaming waves into my brain? Or more generically, like when I think of some hot chick nekkid?
I am right. You do not control what thoughts come into your mind.
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2572 times
Re: Why 'Free Will' is Logically Impossible
Post #318Meh. I can decide to think of me something else when it happens, but I can't too much fuss with your angle here.OneWay wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 10:15 pmWhat do you mean nice try?JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 10:01 pmNice try tinfoil salesperson.OneWay wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 9:27 pmTry to control your thoughts.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 9:10 pmIs this some sort of ESP or such?
Of course the external can affect my thoughts, but it's me thinking em.
When you can't come back and tell me,
why you can't.
If they were your own thoughts,
then you would be able to think
the thoughts you want to think...
all the time.
But you can't. So you don't.
You think the thoughts that another source is
putting in your mind.
Seriously though, are you saying a specific entity is beaming waves into my brain? Or more generically, like when I think of some hot chick nekkid?
I am right. You do not control what thoughts come into your mind.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
Re: Why 'Free Will' is Logically Impossible
Post #319No you can't, that is just an incontrollable reaction to a thoughtJoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 10:51 pmMeh. I can decide to think of me something else when it happens,OneWay wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 10:15 pmWhat do you mean nice try?JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 10:01 pmNice try tinfoil salesperson.OneWay wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 9:27 pmTry to control your thoughts.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 9:10 pmIs this some sort of ESP or such?
Of course the external can affect my thoughts, but it's me thinking em.
When you can't come back and tell me,
why you can't.
If they were your own thoughts,
then you would be able to think
the thoughts you want to think...
all the time.
But you can't. So you don't.
You think the thoughts that another source is
putting in your mind.
Seriously though, are you saying a specific entity is beaming waves into my brain? Or more generically, like when I think of some hot chick nekkid?
I am right. You do not control what thoughts come into your mind.
due to the preceding thought put in your mind by another source other than you.
Like blinking your eyes.
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2572 times
Re: Why 'Free Will' is Logically Impossible
Post #320I'd caution folks against thinking this is some kinda deep, life changing knowledge before they fetch off to join the nunnery.
Further caution is warranted regarding this "another source", as well. Unless one can show whom or what that source is, it's fair to say normal brainial processes are at play.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin