.
It is unfair to expect or require that apologists debate fairly, honorably and ethically because:
a) Theirs is the weak position in debate that is unsupported by evidence or reason
b) They are usually unaccustomed to having claims and statements questioned or challenged, particularly by non-believers
c) They are burdened with defending strange supernatural ideas by Bronze Age storytellers (later codified by religious fanatics)
Since Christian Apologetics has been demonstrated incapable of competing with Non-Theistic views in fairly moderated debate, several advantages are assumed by the weak side. To wit, Apologists assume that they are allowed to:
1. Use a single source of information without substantiation or validation
2. Use the source to "prove" itself without acknowledging that as circular reasoning
3. Claim that citing a source that cannot be verified constitutes "evidence"
4. Maintain that a source known to contain error is "true"
5. Interpret the source to mean anything that will support their "argument"
6. Make insulting statements provided they can be attributed to "god"
7. Create new and novel definitions of words
8. Claim "divine guidance" for their source and for themselves
9. Demean opposing beliefs and convictions
10. Assume an attitude of superiority based upon religious beliefs
11. Refuse to substantiate any claims
12. Preach in lieu of debate
13. Proselytize under the guise of debate
14. Assume that everyone must follow some form of dogma and doctrine (especially Atheists)
15. Act indignant and self-righteous if religious views and "truths" are challenged in debate
16. Use Argumentum ad Populum as though it was a valid argument
17. Demand that claims be accepted "unless proven false"
18. Duck uncomfortable questions
19. Use any debate tactic or trick to promote and defend religion
20. Be dishonest if necessary to defeat "enemies of god"
21. Use Special Pleading by evoking "god" as an authority
22. Claim special knowledge or insight based upon religious belief
23. Claim knowledge of science based upon study of theology and doctrine
24. Identify religious promotional literature as "truth"
25. Regard all opposing views and individuals as inferior or "heathen"
26. Ignore significant points made by opponents
27. Use personal opinion in lieu of non-existent evidence
28. Refer to spiritualism and/or fantasy as being real
29. Claim Josephus as "independent verification" that Jesus lived – even though credible theologians consider the Testimonium Flavium (reference to Jesus) to be an insertion (fraud).
30. Refer to invisible, undetectable super beings as real without proof
31. Promise rewards in an "afterlife" to those who agree to convert to their religion
32. Threaten punishment n an "afterlife" for anyone who refuses to worship "gods"
33. Refer to an "afterlife" as though it was real – even though no evidence exists.
34. Consider "Christianity" as a unified group even though it consists of tens of thousands of denominations, sects, splinter groups and cults that differ (often significantly) in dogma and worship practices
35. Refuse to define or identify "god"
36. Refuse to identify a means to distinguish between "true gods" and "false gods"
37. Claim superior knowledge of "the bible" based upon church affiliation and bible belief rather than actual bible study
38. Claim that "god" is a loving, forgiving, "father in heaven" in spite of clear biblical description of an angry, vengeful, hostile, warlike, genocidal actions
39. Express unfamiliarity and hostility toward anything identified as (or suspected to be) science (since science is viewed as the enemy of religion)
40. Demand that all pro-Christianity claims be accepted unless proven false beyond all doubt
41. Reject all anti-Christianity claims until proven true beyond all doubt
42. Reject all claims and stories by competing religions without considering their merits
43. Refuse to define "Christianity"
44. Refer to "Real Christians" without providing a definition of the term or any means to identify such people
45. Regard, "because I say so" as final proof of any religious point
46. Regard, "the bible says so" as absolute, unquestionable truth
47. Use dishonest or deliberately misleading claims or answers to questions if necessary to convince others that the religionist positions are true and correct
Add some
Handicap Aids for Weak Apologetic Debaters
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 25089
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
- Location: Bible Belt USA
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 73 times
Handicap Aids for Weak Apologetic Debaters
Post #1.
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Post #2
Are you a slow learner? Have you just figured this out?
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
- Cathar1950
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 10503
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:12 pm
- Location: Michigan(616)
- Been thanked: 2 times
Post #3
It is a good start. It is nice to have a list so I do't have to go over and over some of this stuff over and over again.McCulloch wrote:Are you a slow learner? Have you just figured this out?
We need to sart somekind of database.
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2572 times
Post #4
As I was reading that I kept thinking about Ed McMahon telling "Karnac the Magnificent", (paraphrased) 'Here is the complete list, in it's entirety, all the gathered and collected wisdom'. And of course there would always be something else to add, as pointed out by Zzyzx.
I would like to add "Godwan's Law". With an 'a' to signify Satan. Pet peeve of mine, I have my reasons.
We need to create an apologist's bingo game. Or better yet a drinking game.
I would like to add "Godwan's Law". With an 'a' to signify Satan. Pet peeve of mine, I have my reasons.
We need to create an apologist's bingo game. Or better yet a drinking game.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
- OnceConvinced
- Savant
- Posts: 8969
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
- Location: New Zealand
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Post #5
Great list. A handy one. I've copied and pasted it and will keep a link for it so that it's available as an on-line resource.
I think you've covered all the obvious ones. I'll have to think about it.
I think you've covered all the obvious ones. I'll have to think about it.
Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.
Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.
There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.
Check out my website: Recker's World
- OnceConvinced
- Savant
- Posts: 8969
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
- Location: New Zealand
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Post #6
Similar to this one here...
37. Claim superior knowledge of "the bible" based upon church affiliation and bible belief rather than actual bible study
Claim superior understanding of "the bible" based on alleged possession of the Holy spirit
37. Claim superior knowledge of "the bible" based upon church affiliation and bible belief rather than actual bible study
Claim superior understanding of "the bible" based on alleged possession of the Holy spirit
Last edited by OnceConvinced on Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.
Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.
There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.
Check out my website: Recker's World
- Cathar1950
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 10503
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:12 pm
- Location: Michigan(616)
- Been thanked: 2 times
Post #7
I didn't see it but I could have missed it but there is this problem of when you disagree or reject some dogma or doctrine then you are disagreeing with God or insulting God when they say something stupid.
- OnceConvinced
- Savant
- Posts: 8969
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
- Location: New Zealand
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Post #8
How about:Cathar1950 wrote:I didn't see it but I could have missed it but there is this problem of when you disagree or reject some dogma or doctrine then you are disagreeing with God or insulting God when they say something stupid.
Claim that if you are arguing against me, you are arguing against God.
or
Invoke the phrase "God said it, I believe it, that settles it."
or something along those lines. I think there is another phrase I hear all the time.
"God makes the rules, I don't" or something like that.
Maybe it's covered by 45 and 46
Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.
Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.
There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.
Check out my website: Recker's World