No one will ever know
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Student
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 12:31 am
- Location: North Texas
No one will ever know
Post #1Does anyone have "proof" that God/Satan exists? If there is evidence I'd sure like to hear it. This being a debate site we should have proof but I can't think of any.
Re: No one will ever know
Post #2Besides the obvious, I'd say the answer is no.Spaceman13 wrote:Does anyone have "proof" that God/Satan exists?
Paul must have had you in mind:If there is evidence I'd sure like to hear it. This being a debate site we should have proof but I can't think of any.
- Romans 1
20For [God's] invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So [the non-theists] are without excuse.
Um.
Welp, I guess that just about covers it, so ....
How 'bout them Atlanta Hawks? They gonna make it to the 2nd round this year?

All you deviants out there... remember weinergate. It eventually comes back around. You will be outed.
Re: No one will ever know
Post #5Spaceman13 wrote:Does anyone have "proof" that God/Satan exists? If there is evidence I'd sure like to hear it. This being a debate site we should have proof but I can't think of any.
There is no proof whatsoever that an intelligent mind made the universe, but the logical coherence of that remains dubious.
As for evidence that the Christian God and Satan as depicted in the Bible exist, there is probably none (and the world seems to contradict a literal interpretation of the scriptures).
FRED wrote:The world is filled with evidence.
It is filled with evidence for many scientific theories, but I have yet to see something which qualifies as evidence for the Christian God or any god altogether.
FRED wrote: Peoples are moved by the supernatural to do extremes, even unbelievable crimes belong to the same matter.
Prove that they were moved by the supernatural. Do you know or you just guess? Substantiate. Because I think they had pretty natural bases. The human mind is very complex, let alone societies.
FRED wrote:Evil ideas have their source and doesn't come from no where.
They come from the human mind, from the same source all "ideas" come. That's not "nowhere".
- Slopeshoulder
- Banned
- Posts: 3367
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:46 pm
- Location: San Francisco
Post #6
Poke around this site. This topic has been done to death. Often it becomes a food fight, but behind it all there's a loty of really good stuff. Check it out.
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3762
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:19 pm
- Location: City of the "Angels"
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: No one will ever know
Post #7How about the Higgs Boson?Spaceman13 wrote:Does anyone have "proof" that God/Satan exists? If there is evidence I'd sure like to hear it. This being a debate site we should have proof but I can't think of any.

It's not called the "God particle" for nothing...
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/ ... nbach-text

Re: No one will ever know
Post #8Of course there's a reason.Shermana wrote:How about the Higgs Boson?
[...]
It's not called the "God particle" for nothing...
How does that count as evidence that God and Satan exist? There's a nebula called the Crab Nebula, but that doesn't prove that a crab exists there as far as I knowWikipedia wrote:"The God particle"
The Higgs boson is often referred to as "the God particle" by the media,[33] after the title of Leon Lederman's book, The God Particle: If the Universe Is the Answer, What Is the Question?.[34] While use of this term may have contributed to increased media interest in particle physics and the Large Hadron Collider,[34] many scientists dislike it, since it overstates the particle's importance, not least since its discovery would still leave unanswered questions about the unification of QCD, the Electroweak interaction and gravity, and the ultimate origin of the universe.[33] In a renaming competition, a jury of physicists chose the name "the champagne bottle boson" as the best popular name.[35]

-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3762
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:19 pm
- Location: City of the "Angels"
- Been thanked: 5 times
Post #9
Well you admit there's a reason, now if you're as keen on astrophysics as you are on biology, perhaps you might understand there's a big difference between something being called a "Crab Nebula" and a "god particle".
It's not exactly purely arbitrary like the Camel and the Llama being in different genera.
There's also the issue of Earth Gravity that even Einstein was baffled by, but that's another subject.
Weinberg and Salam may be able to answer the questions about Electroweak....
It's not exactly purely arbitrary like the Camel and the Llama being in different genera.
There's also the issue of Earth Gravity that even Einstein was baffled by, but that's another subject.
Weinberg and Salam may be able to answer the questions about Electroweak....
Post #10
Not really. Both are named according to a cultural human concept, this is the reason. However, they're both as indicative of existence (zero), though you're allowed to prove otherwise.Shermana wrote:Well you admit there's a reason, now if you're as keen on astrophysics as you are on biology, perhaps you might understand there's a big difference between something being called a "Crab Nebula" and a "god particle".
I don't know how arbitrary you might consider both of these activities, but they have some criteria. The criteria for biological classification is not the subject of this topic, and the criteria for that naming as I previously put is one chosen by Leon Lederman, but is not indicative of its existence, just a catchy and easily recognizable title (a good thing for a book).Shermana wrote:It's not exactly purely arbitrary like the Camel and the Llama being in different genera.
Yes, those are other subjects about physics.Shermana wrote:There's also the issue of Earth Gravity that even Einstein was baffled by, but that's another subject.
Weinberg and Salam may be able to answer the questions about Electroweak....