According to the teaching of ( Judaism ) how do they really

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Malachi-Zede-El
Banned
Banned
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:08 pm

According to the teaching of ( Judaism ) how do they really

Post #1

Post by Malachi-Zede-El »

According to the teaching of ( Judaism ) how do they really feel about Jesus ?

Malachi-Zede-El
Banned
Banned
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:08 pm

Post #11

Post by Malachi-Zede-El »

ThatGirlAgain wrote:
Malachi-Zede-El wrote:
ThatGirlAgain wrote:
Malachi-Zede-El wrote:
Autodidact wrote:Goat makes a good point. One of the central tenets of Judaism is that God is one. Different Jews see this differently, but one way of looking at it is that God is everywhere and in everything, omnipresent and abstract. God does not have babies--that is polytheism. Judaism is uncompromisingly monotheistic.
Good point the liar paul never met jesus anyway .


So what your saying is that goat , Can not be speaking for all jews . Thankyou for your answer.
If you are referring to Jews for Jesus, from what I can tell they are really a fundamentalist trinitarian Christian sect with a misleading name. They are all over the subways in New York City. I have engaged a number of them in conversation (That Girl!) and despite their claims to the contrary I have never encountered a single one whose claim to being Jewish held up to questioning. There might possibly be real Jews in Jews for Jesus but you could not tell by me.

If Yashu'a , Isa , Jesus , Was a jew then why aren't all christians jew also ?
Because Paul made the case for the Jesus movement being universal in nature and not restricted to Jews and that therefore gentiles should be allowed in. In not too many years the proto-orthodox community that became mainstream Christianity was exclusively gentile. There were Jews who believed Jesus was the Messiah but not divine, e.g., the Ebionites, but these were separate communities. But it appears that the strongly Jewish elements in the early history of proto-orthodoxy such as the Jerusalem church and Matthew's Pauline but still very Jewish community did not last long.

User avatar
Autodidact
Prodigy
Posts: 3014
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:18 pm

Post #12

Post by Autodidact »

Malachi-Zede-El wrote:
Autodidact wrote:Goat makes a good point. One of the central tenets of Judaism is that God is one. Different Jews see this differently, but one way of looking at it is that God is everywhere and in everything, omnipresent and abstract. God does not have babies--that is polytheism. Judaism is uncompromisingly monotheistic.

So what your saying is that goat , Can not be speaking for all jews . Thankyou for your answer.
Of course not; can you speak for all gentiles?

Malachi-Zede-El
Banned
Banned
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:08 pm

Post #13

Post by Malachi-Zede-El »

Autodidact wrote:
Malachi-Zede-El wrote:
Autodidact wrote:Goat makes a good point. One of the central tenets of Judaism is that God is one. Different Jews see this differently, but one way of looking at it is that God is everywhere and in everything, omnipresent and abstract. God does not have babies--that is polytheism. Judaism is uncompromisingly monotheistic.

So what your saying is that goat , Can not be speaking for all jews . Thankyou for your answer.
Of course not; can you speak for all gentiles?
What a gentiles and where did they come from care to share ?

User avatar
Autodidact
Prodigy
Posts: 3014
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:18 pm

Post #14

Post by Autodidact »

Malachi-Zede-El wrote:
Autodidact wrote:
Malachi-Zede-El wrote:
Autodidact wrote:Goat makes a good point. One of the central tenets of Judaism is that God is one. Different Jews see this differently, but one way of looking at it is that God is everywhere and in everything, omnipresent and abstract. God does not have babies--that is polytheism. Judaism is uncompromisingly monotheistic.

So what your saying is that goat , Can not be speaking for all jews . Thankyou for your answer.
Of course not; can you speak for all gentiles?
What a gentiles and where did they come from care to share ?
Not sure I understand you, but a gentile is a non-Jew.

Malachi-Zede-El
Banned
Banned
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:08 pm

Post #15

Post by Malachi-Zede-El »

Autodidact wrote:
Malachi-Zede-El wrote:
Autodidact wrote:
Malachi-Zede-El wrote:
Autodidact wrote:Goat makes a good point. One of the central tenets of Judaism is that God is one. Different Jews see this differently, but one way of looking at it is that God is everywhere and in everything, omnipresent and abstract. God does not have babies--that is polytheism. Judaism is uncompromisingly monotheistic.

So what your saying is that goat , Can not be speaking for all jews . Thankyou for your answer.
Of course not; can you speak for all gentiles?
What a gentiles and where did they come from care to share ?
Not sure I understand you, but a gentile is a non-Jew.

You understand very well you busy kissing up , By the way there no such as a jew . There were no ''J'' in the socalled english language until 1565 A.D. So where did the word come from ?

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #16

Post by McCulloch »

Malachi-Zede-El wrote: By the way there no such as a jew . There were no ''J'' in the socalled english language until 1565 A.D. So where did the word come from ?
[font=Times New Roman]The letters I and J were once the same. The first English-language book to make a clear distinction between I and J was published in 1634. In older forms of English, Judea would have been written Iudaea. It is logical nonsense to declare that simply because some western languages did not distinguish between I and J that entities named with a J could not exist.

English is a language which has borrowed many words from other languages, perhaps more than any other human language. On interesting example is whisk[e]y. It is an Anglicization of a Celtic term literally meaning "water of life". But the Goidelic languages (Irish and Scottish Gaelic) have no W, K or Y. So, how the heck do you spell whisky without W, K or Y? In Scottish Gaelic it is uisge. The ui is pronounced similar to the English whi and the final e is pronounced. The Scots have no use for silent letters.

English, according to linguists, is a language. I have no idea what the point of the expression socalled is in the post.[/font]
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

Malachi-Zede-El
Banned
Banned
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:08 pm

Post #17

Post by Malachi-Zede-El »

McCulloch wrote:
Malachi-Zede-El wrote: By the way there no such as a jew . There were no ''J'' in the socalled english language until 1565 A.D. So where did the word come from ?
[font=Times New Roman]The letters I and J were once the same. The first English-language book to make a clear distinction between I and J was published in 1634. In older forms of English, Judea would have been written Iudaea. It is logical nonsense to declare that simply because some western languages did not distinguish between I and J that entities named with a J could not exist.

English is a language which has borrowed many words from other languages, perhaps more than any other human language. On interesting example is whisk[e]y. It is an Anglicization of a Celtic term literally meaning "water of life". But the Goidelic languages (Irish and Scottish Gaelic) have no W, K or Y. So, how the heck do you spell whisky without W, K or Y? In Scottish Gaelic it is uisge. The ui is pronounced similar to the English whi and the final e is pronounced. The Scots have no use for silent letters.

English, according to linguists, is a language. I have no idea what the point of the expression socalled is in the post.[/font]

The name '' Jew '' is reaaly a Yiddiah word . This name was created by two groups of jews ; The Sephardim and Ashkenazh . The Ashkenazim were originally Khazars from Russia who converted and picked up the name Ashkenazim ( Genesis 10 ; 3 ) . And used it as their own when in fact they were from the seed of Canaan , Not the seed of Gomer - aramic - meaning '' Completion and Riphath - aramic - meaning '' Speaker Or Spoke '' and Togarmah - aramic - meaning '' Bony , Strong '' , Ashkenaz , in hebrew os , meaning '' The Spreader of the fire ''

He was the son of Gomer , Son of Japheth , One of the triplet sons of Noah . Ashkenaz was the first son named of the three sons of Gomer , The son of Japheth ( Genesis 10 ; 3 ) . And a kingdom asspcated with Ararat ( Turkey ) and Minni . Now - A -Days the name is falsely applied to the ...

Jews of Germany ( Aryans ) , Europeans of Northern France ( Frances ) , European from the tenth century on .

I could go on on , But I'm at work . Just wanted you to know I Know what I'm talking about here ok . Real story here none of the website crap .

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #18

Post by McCulloch »

Malachi-Zede-El wrote: The name '' Jew '' is reaaly [really] a Yiddiah [Yiddish] word .
[font=Times New Roman]The English word Jew is ultimately from Latin Iudaeum. The Latin Iudaeus simply means Judaean, "from the land of Judaea". The Latin term itself, like the corresponding Greek , is a loan from Aramaic Y'hdi, corresponding to Hebrew: "", Yehudi (sg.); "", Yehudim (pl.), in origin the term for a member of the tribe of Judah or the people of the kingdom of Judah. The name of both the tribe and kingdom derive from Judah, the fourth son of Jacob. The Hebrew word for Jew, "" ISO 259-3 Yhudi, is pronounced [jehudi], with the stress on the final syllable, in Israeli Hebrew, in its basic form.[/font] -- Wiki.

But why go to researched sources of information when you can just make stuff up?
Malachi-Zede-El wrote: This name was created by two groups of jews ; The Sephardim and Ashkenazh . The Ashkenazim were originally Khazars from Russia
The Ashkenazim are the Jews descended from the medieval Jewish communities along the Rhine in Germany from Alsace in the south to the Rhineland in the north. Jews have lived in Germany, or "Ashkenaz", at least since the early 4th century.
Malachi-Zede-El wrote: Jews of Germany ( Aryans )
The word Aryan properly refers to a language group spoken mostly in what is now Northern India. When it is used in reference to the those defined as the white race it has no basis in current historical scholarship and is generally associated with racist ideologies of neo-nazism.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

Malachi-Zede-El
Banned
Banned
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:08 pm

Post #19

Post by Malachi-Zede-El »

McCulloch wrote:
Malachi-Zede-El wrote: The name '' Jew '' is reaaly [really] a Yiddiah [Yiddish] word .
[font=Times New Roman]The English word Jew is ultimately from Latin Iudaeum. The Latin Iudaeus simply means Judaean, "from the land of Judaea". The Latin term itself, like the corresponding Greek , is a loan from Aramaic Y'hdi, corresponding to Hebrew: "", Yehudi (sg.); "", Yehudim (pl.), in origin the term for a member of the tribe of Judah or the people of the kingdom of Judah. The name of both the tribe and kingdom derive from Judah, the fourth son of Jacob. The Hebrew word for Jew, "" ISO 259-3 Yhudi, is pronounced [jehudi], with the stress on the final syllable, in Israeli Hebrew, in its basic form.[/font] -- Wiki.

But why go to researched sources of information when you can just make stuff up?
Malachi-Zede-El wrote: This name was created by two groups of jews ; The Sephardim and Ashkenazh . The Ashkenazim were originally Khazars from Russia
The Ashkenazim are the Jews descended from the medieval Jewish communities along the Rhine in Germany from Alsace in the south to the Rhineland in the north. Jews have lived in Germany, or "Ashkenaz", at least since the early 4th century.
Malachi-Zede-El wrote: Jews of Germany ( Aryans )
The word Aryan properly refers to a language group spoken mostly in what is now Northern India. When it is used in reference to the those defined as the white race it has no basis in current historical scholarship and is generally associated with racist ideologies of neo-nazism.

I just won a bet here on the job .

Being that the jew have writen 90% of the Religious books , they have master away of removeing truth from history . Now your going to say this is another Attack / Insult on the Jews , But its the truth . One thing about history the truth is out there for those who willing to seek it . Let me say this before I'm kick off here ok

I Don't follow one school of thought , This bother people like yourself and coat . And that because people have been trian to follow a certain school of though . And those who doesn't adhere to your trian of though are label Anti -This or That . which is an olddddddddd trick . And I must say you play it veryyyyy well to control ones though .

Whenever people stop seeking to feed their own ego / other , And began to seek out the real History of the world for themselves and lay aside what they have been told by people like goat , Will have to explain game they're playing .

By you caugh a brake , When you created post about the history / family line of UK -Etc Etc . I notice you didn't speak about the son canaan

By the way wasn't side steping your answer . But according to scripture they were writening in Aramic Not Greek / Latin Nor English . By you claim to know the language , You should know when changeing one laugues to another it loses it true meaning . Doesn't it .

User avatar
Autodidact
Prodigy
Posts: 3014
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:18 pm

Post #20

Post by Autodidact »

For me, anti-semitism is a symptom of pure evil. When someone exhibits it, they let us know that they are a deeply damaged person desperately in need of help. Unfortunately, if not managed, such people can also inflict terrible damage.

Post Reply