I have often heard that atheists are amoral and that Christianity offers the way to morality. This thread is quite simple then I guess.
1) Is there any evidence to link atheism and amorality? What?
2) Is there any evidence to link atheism and morality? What?
3) Is there any evidence to link Christianity and amorality? What?
4) Is there any evidence to link Christianity and morality? What?
Atheism and morality vs. Christianity and morality
Moderator: Moderators
Atheism and morality vs. Christianity and morality
Post #1What we do for ourselves dies with us,
What we do for others and the world remains
and is immortal.
-Albert Pine
Never be bullied into silence.
Never allow yourself to be made a victim.
Accept no one persons definition of your life; define yourself.
-Harvey Fierstein
What we do for others and the world remains
and is immortal.
-Albert Pine
Never be bullied into silence.
Never allow yourself to be made a victim.
Accept no one persons definition of your life; define yourself.
-Harvey Fierstein
- JohnPaul
- Banned

- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:00 am
- Location: northern California coast, USA
Post #11
Take your choice. The figure of 100 thousand I read in a slick magazine about 60 years ago, and claimed the figure was derived from still existing records of individual churches in Europe. Remember, the good Christians back then were proud of the "God's work" they were doing and kept careful records which are available to historians today. If you don't like the figure, use any of those you have found. I admit none of those occurred in the past generation, but some recently reported in Africa did.johnmarc wrote:Do you have any support for this claim? I have spent the last hour on the Internet and have found all manner of claims. Which one did you use and why?JohnPaul wrote:
I am sure the 70 to 100 thousand women tortured and burned as witches by Christians in Europe would have appreciated that explanation of Christian love before they died.
John
John
- JohnPaul
- Banned

- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:00 am
- Location: northern California coast, USA
Post #12
Beside the point, but my last wife had been a Wiccan Witch in her younger days before I married her, and she and I were married by a Wiccan priestess. The government in Washington state recognizes Wicca as a legitimate religion and recognizes the authority of their priestesses to perform marriages, even if you may not.johnmarc wrote:Do you have any support for this claim? I have spent the last hour on the Internet and have found all manner of claims. Which one did you use and why?JohnPaul wrote:
I am sure the 70 to 100 thousand women tortured and burned as witches by Christians in Europe would have appreciated that explanation of Christian love before they died.
John
John
John
Post #13
How does the development of a physical material thing make immaterial concepts exist?Goat wrote:Just because Christianity allows for that (Or makes the claim, not allow), does not mean it is true. The immaterial concepts appear in the secular world because of the development of the brain and imagination. That does not mean the concept has actual physical existence.
However, when it comes to love, .. which definition do you have for love? The bond between people is biochemical reactions.
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Post #14
That number is a bit inflated. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch_tria ... ern_periodJohnPaul wrote:Take your choice. The figure of 100 thousand I read in a slick magazine about 60 years ago, and claimed the figure was derived from still existing records of individual churches in Europe. Remember, the good Christians back then were proud of the "God's work" they were doing and kept careful records which are available to historians today. If you don't like the figure, use any of those you have found. I admit none of those occurred in the past generation, but some recently reported in Africa did.johnmarc wrote:Do you have any support for this claim? I have spent the last hour on the Internet and have found all manner of claims. Which one did you use and why?JohnPaul wrote:
I am sure the 70 to 100 thousand women tortured and burned as witches by Christians in Europe would have appreciated that explanation of Christian love before they died.
John
John
While early trials fall still within the Late Medieval period, the peak of the witch hunt was during the period of the European wars of religion, peaking between about 1580 and 1630. The witch hunts declined in the early 18th century. In Great Britain, their end is marked by the Witchcraft Act of 1735. But sporadic witch-trials continued to be held during the second half of the 18th century, the last known dating to 1782,[2] though a prosecution was commenced in Tennessee as recently as 1833.[3] [4][5]
Over the entire duration of the phenomenon of some three centuries, an estimated total of 40,000 to 60,000 people were executed
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
- JohnPaul
- Banned

- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:00 am
- Location: northern California coast, USA
Post #15
Thanks, Goat. I believe some more were burned in Mexico during the Spanish Inquisition there, which are probably not included in the European figures. Christians mostly went after Jews in Mexico, which was enough in itself to burn them, although witchcraft might be included in the charges. Women were an easy target, and torture usually resulted in many male relatives executed with them. Most were burned in groups, although I remember reading of one high-class woman who was choked individually by an iron collar. The Spanish Inquisition was also very active in South America, especially Peru, but I don't remember seeing any figures for that.Goat wrote:That number is a bit inflated. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch_tria ... ern_periodJohnPaul wrote:Take your choice. The figure of 100 thousand I read in a slick magazine about 60 years ago, and claimed the figure was derived from still existing records of individual churches in Europe. Remember, the good Christians back then were proud of the "God's work" they were doing and kept careful records which are available to historians today. If you don't like the figure, use any of those you have found. I admit none of those occurred in the past generation, but some recently reported in Africa did.johnmarc wrote:Do you have any support for this claim? I have spent the last hour on the Internet and have found all manner of claims. Which one did you use and why?JohnPaul wrote:
I am sure the 70 to 100 thousand women tortured and burned as witches by Christians in Europe would have appreciated that explanation of Christian love before they died.
John
John
While early trials fall still within the Late Medieval period, the peak of the witch hunt was during the period of the European wars of religion, peaking between about 1580 and 1630. The witch hunts declined in the early 18th century. In Great Britain, their end is marked by the Witchcraft Act of 1735. But sporadic witch-trials continued to be held during the second half of the 18th century, the last known dating to 1782,[2] though a prosecution was commenced in Tennessee as recently as 1833.[3] [4][5]
Over the entire duration of the phenomenon of some three centuries, an estimated total of 40,000 to 60,000 people were executed
John
- Jester
- Prodigy
- Posts: 4248
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:36 pm
- Location: Seoul, South Korea
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
Post #16
This is a one-liner post that doesn't address the debate.JohnPaul wrote:I am sure the 70 to 100 thousand women tortured and burned as witches by Christians in Europe would have appreciated that explanation of Christian love before they died.
Also, it could be seen as mildly inflammatory. Please be careful about that.
Please review our Rules.
______________
Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
We must continually ask ourselves whether victory has become more central to our goals than truth.
- Slopeshoulder
- Banned

- Posts: 3367
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:46 pm
- Location: San Francisco
Post #17
At the risk of getting my head bitten off by my atheist friends, I'd like to try to make a subtle point:
While I reject natural law theology, and FULLY embrace ethics based in empathy available to all people, I will give a shout out, or a win on points, to religion in general - not because they are more moral, rather because they are traditions, gathering places, and languages that have developed a mature framework for developing, navigating, and adjudicating ethics. In my secular and technocratic life, I experience the absence of that.
While I reject natural law theology, and FULLY embrace ethics based in empathy available to all people, I will give a shout out, or a win on points, to religion in general - not because they are more moral, rather because they are traditions, gathering places, and languages that have developed a mature framework for developing, navigating, and adjudicating ethics. In my secular and technocratic life, I experience the absence of that.
Post #19
Simply because the physical material brain is capable of imagining immaterial concepts. It's an evolutionary survival trait. That rustle might be a tiger lurking in the bushes. If it is, you're probably dead. If you hear the rustle and can imagine a tiger there you run like hell and will improve your chances of survival.cholland wrote: How does the development of a physical material thing make immaterial concepts exist?
Last edited by Artie on Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: hi...
Post #20Morality existed long before Christianity. Christianity or "God's law" is simply human logic, reason and common sense producing moral laws which some people later ascribe to deities.David 2.0 wrote:If it works don't fix it.
Thats the boat I'm in.
An atheist that fully subscribes to the morality he learned as a christian.

