Dawkin's Delusion

[Neandertal Ned]

Dawkin's Delusion is a serious psychic disorder or mental aberration and disturbance afflicting many atheists today. This is the only conclusion that Christian psychologists, philosophers and the Christian laity can come to in light of the new evidence provided by a leading Christian theologian.



Do you have any objections to Christians labeling such a serious psychic disorder or mental aberration and disturbance as exhibited by Dawkins as Dawkin's Delusion?

[Ragna]

That's not a biological definition of evolution. There is no evidence of any biological changes in humans over time.

Oh, but by all means, there are. The fact that there are different humans and that we all have a common origin logically imply the existence of such changes. Questioning that will reveal itself to be futile.

Fortunately, you can't take it back 10Kya, let alone 200kya unless you have a time machine. You have an expansive imagination though.

We also have tools and eyes to look in the ground where things, sometimes, don't go anywhere. We also have the brains to interpret the meaning of that.

Planet of the Apes is a movie.

A statement of yours I can agree with.

[alex00ander]

This physiologic can say whatever he likes. It's not that Atheist are going to go out and burn embassies because some dude insulted their prophet or god.

It's a pathetic reaction to Dawkins success and gained popularity, let alone his large conversion rate into Atheism. Christianity IS loosing to science (unlike Islam).








industrial lenses | Aruba Restaurants | Permanent Hair Straightening

[A Troubled Man]

Dawkin's Delusion is a serious psychic disorder or mental aberration and disturbance afflicting many atheists today. This is the only conclusion that Christian psychologists, philosophers and the Christian laity can come to in light of the new evidence provided by a leading Christian theologian.



Do you have any objections to Christians labeling such a serious psychic disorder or mental aberration and disturbance as exhibited by Dawkins as Dawkin's Delusion?

I have no problem with Christians making any labels they want. However, the reviews on the Amazon site speak volumes for McGrath's dishonesty in his book.

"The most frustrating thing about this book was how consistently McGrath claimed Dawkins holds certain views, then proves those views false. Unfortunately, a quick glance at the actual text shows over and again that Dawkins never claimed those arguments in the first place.

He says that Dawkins falls back on all sorts of arguments such as memes that are completely insubstantial. The funny thing is that if you read Dawkins's book, you see that he makes no claim to the authenticity of the ideas. In fact, he is quite careful to couch all of the claims as hypothesis, nothing more.

Next, McGrath seems to imply that Dawkins hates all religious people. He does not. In fact, he talks many times about how much he likes these people. It's not the people he hates, it's the belief systems."