Is homosexuality worse than heterosexual infidelity? If not, why do Christians hate gay people so much? If the two are equally bad, why do so many Christians who would never be gay cheat on their wife?The morning after Chick-fil-A day
AUGUST 2, 2012 BY MIKE PATZ 1 COMMENT
Its the morning after the Chick-fil-A drama and Im still chewing.
I remember the day I was sitting next to an incredibly nice gay guy, enjoying a really good conversation when he dropped the ultimate conversation-killer.
What do you do for a living?
I hate that question. I hate that question because people cant help but size you up when they hear the answer. I hate that question because were already prone to think of ourselves as human doings instead of human beings. I hate that question because of what it does to people when they find out what I do.
Ive often tried to find ways around the question. Ive told people I work with non-profit organizations (this is true). Ive told people that I write (this is true). Ive even told people that I am a spiritual guru that assists people in opening their third eye (I really like this one). For whatever reason, on that day, I just cut to the chase. I work as a pastor of a church.
Everything changed. His next words went something like this:
Listen, Im gay and Im content with who I am. Im sure you are going to say that I was not born this way, and I wont argue the point. For a significant part of my childhood I was violated by a neighbor and then an uncle. Did that play a role in my sexual orientation? Possibly. I also know many people that had a trouble-free childhood and they turned out very happily gay. Regardless of how it occurred, this is who I am now and I make no apologies for the man I have become. If God has a problem with a man who tries to be true to himself, then I have a problem with a God that allows these kinds of things to happen to kids like me in the first place.
I kept thinking how much easier it would have been if I said I was a writer.
Fortunately, Jesus has a way of showing up in the middle of conversations just like these, and on that day He did not disappoint. My friend shared his heart, and I shared mine. Ive never seen people change via argument, which is why I prefer to help people taste and see that the Lord is good.
This is where Christians tend to blow it.
They taste really bad. They serve up some really Biblical truth in some really nauseating ways. They major on minors and minor on majors. They tend to be extremely unaware of their pride, and pride is like bad breath " everybody knows you have it, except for you. Its always easy to scream the loudest about sins you do not personally struggle with.
So why are we yelling?
Im still not sure why Christians are so militant in their opposition of homosexual immorality while they seem to go so mild with their opposition of heterosexual immorality. I hear the concern about homosexuality and the catch phrase is often family values: Imagine how much it will mess up a child who is being raised by two women, the reasoning goes. A kid needs both a father and a mother, we say. Yet the gays I speak with often wonder how the church can talk about family values when 50-60% of Christian couples divorce. Talk about family values. So a community of people that do not stay married is trying to talk to us about marital morality. How ironic.
In light of the fact that Christians have just as much pre-marital sex and watch just as much porn and divorce just as frequently why arent we more embarrassed to speak out on the issue of homosexual sin? Good question.
One guy said, Its funny how you can claim the grace of God to cover heterosexual sin while saying that homosexual sin is beyond the reach of Gods grace.
That brings me to all the Chick"fil-A drama.
I get why Chick-fil-A day looked so annoying to so many people yesterday. I understand why people have planned a kiss-in this Friday. And I can see why people shake their heads when they read yet another homophobic Facebook post.
Church people ask, why wont our culture repent? My answer: because repentance is a learned behavior. Someone has to model it. I tell parents that its silly to expect a child to repent when they have never seen a parent repent. And its futile to wait for a culture to repent when a culture has never seen the Church repent.
Is the real problem with our culture the unrepentant gay community? No. Its an unrepentant Church.
I am so sorry today for all the hatred that Christians have dished out toward gays. I am so sorry for all of the homophobic sarcasm that has come from the pulpits of Christian ministers. I am so sorry for the way we pick and choose which sins to condemn. I am so sorry that we have claimed to follow Jesus while we neglected widows and orphans, and then engaged in gossip and gluttony. I am so sorry that we have provided such a bad example for the rest of society to follow. Im embarrassed, Im ashamed, and I repent. Im serious. I repent.
Yet Im also concerned that when our culture most needs to hear truth, Christians dont know how to tell it.
Weve come to a dangerous moment in culture, and Christians are ill-equipped to handle it. We have reached the point where disagreement is now seen as hatred. I read an article today where a woman was appealing to Christians to recognize their hateful crimes against the homosexual community. I nodded in agreement, but decided to keep reading to see how she itemized these crimes. Paragraph after paragraph described the hurt and rejection resulting from these offenses, but it took a while to get to the actual crime: Christians claim that homosexuality is a sin. I was stunned. Disagreement was equated with hate.
Christians have a substantial challenge on their hands because every generation and every culture is going to disagree with Gods truth at some point. How interesting that our USAmerican culture considers Christianity to be closed-minded on the issue of sexual morality, while the majority of world religions are in agreement in opposition to the USA position on sexuality. Is USA culture not closed-minded for claiming that all these other religions are wrong? Is it not hypocrisy to say that we will be tolerant with everybody " except the people we consider intolerant. Closed-mindedness is not just a religious thing, its a human thing.
If ever Christians needed some good breath, it is now.
Because we have to kiss this world with the truth of God.
The problem is, no matter how good your kiss, your breath can ruin the whole experience. And no matter how much truth we bring, if it does not drip with grace and humility, it always falls flat.
Im not asking Christians to stop telling the truth, Im asking them to brush their teeth.
What does that look like? The apostle Paul said to speak evil of no one, to avoid quarreling, to be gentle, and to show perfect courtesy towards all people. (Titus 3:2)
Can you imagine what would happen if an entire chunk of Christians decided to embrace the Titus 3:2 approach? Will people be staging protests and kiss-ins to protest Chick-fil-A? Maybe. But the way of Jesus is to speak evil of no one. Has Chick-fil-A been bullied? Yes. But the kingdom of Jesus response is to avoid quarreling. Is there more drama to come as our culture becomes increasingly polarized? Of course. But if God is our Father, then we have to start showing the family resemblance, being gentle and showing perfect courtesy. This should have an effect on the way we post our thoughts on Facebook. Or talk to angry people at work. Or wait in line at Chick-fil-A.
You see, we cant shrink back on truth-telling or we dishonor the very Gospel. But when we bring the truth of Jesus we have to do it in the Spirit of Jesus.
Or stop being surprised when our culture doesnt want a kiss.
Is homosexuality worse than heterosexual infidelity?
Moderator: Moderators
- Moses Yoder
- Guru
- Posts: 2462
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 2:46 pm
- Location: White Pigeon, Michigan
Is homosexuality worse than heterosexual infidelity?
Post #1I don't normally copy and paste an article but this is great stuff. At the end I have a question.
Matthew 16:26
New King James Version (NKJV)
26 For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul?
New King James Version (NKJV)
26 For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul?
-
Allahakbar
- Banned

- Posts: 499
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 10:47 am
Re: Is homosexuality worse than heterosexual infidelity?
Post #121[Replying to post 119 by noshameinChrist]
Just as you claim that Jesus spoke about homosexuality your interpretation of what paul wrote is only valid as a confirmation of what you have been taught to believe.
No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says: He is always convinced that it says what he means.
Just as you claim that Jesus spoke about homosexuality your interpretation of what paul wrote is only valid as a confirmation of what you have been taught to believe.
No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says: He is always convinced that it says what he means.
"Holy Scripture: A book sent down from heaven.... Holy Scriptures contain all that a Christian should know and believe, provided he adds to it a million or so commentaries.
[Voltaire]
No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says: He is always convinced that it says what he means.
George Bernard Shaw
[Voltaire]
No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says: He is always convinced that it says what he means.
George Bernard Shaw
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Is homosexuality worse than heterosexual infidelity?
Post #122noshameinChrist wrote:As I have said already, I believe Christ has spoken on the subject. This was done through at least of one of his apostles - Paul (Roman 1:27). In addition, when Christ spoke of the subject of sexual relationships it was always between a man and a woman (e.g. Matthew 5:31ff). You simply are wrong my friend.Allahakbar wrote:And if you wish to claim christianity and to follow the teachings of christ and christ makes absolutely no mention of homosexuality then you by rejecting homosexuality on the basis of christs teachings are committing HERESY.noshameinChrist wrote: [Replying to post 106 by KCKID]
Actually, your question is not frustrating at all (at least not for me - as a Christian). I do think however that it is steeped in absolute rejection of scripture. I think you know that scripture opposes homosexual relationships.
I think it is more courageous to simply say "I reject this" instead of bantering about with insincere questions about whether Jesus specifically and expressly condemns homosexual relationships.
Bottom line, it is your CHOICE whether or not to follow Christ. Nobody can take that right to choose away from you. I personally would encourage to follow Christ, but I realize I cannot make you do it.
The Bible teach that at one time period God overlooked ignorance, but now he commands all men to repent (Acts 17:30). Whether or not you understand or believe this will not make it any less true.
Do you follow christ's teaching?
Funny how Paul never actually met the earthly Jesus, but knew SO much about what he wanted.
I rather suspect that most people who claim to be Christian follow Paul more than Jesus.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
-
Allahakbar
- Banned

- Posts: 499
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 10:47 am
Re: Is homosexuality worse than heterosexual infidelity?
Post #123Is it just me or does anyone else find it unbelievable that Jesus who taught to love everyone would then go ahead and say this?
btw nsic it was you who quoted M 5:31 as Jesus do support a claim of yours regarding Jesus discussing sexual relations.
5:31 Speaks specifically about "anyone" divorcing "his wife" and giving her a certificate. Not a single word about sexual relations.
Just like he never said a word about homosexual relations.
Especially when he protected the adulteress in another episode?Matthew 5:31 It has been said, Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.[f] 32 But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, makes her the victim of adultery, and anyone who marries a divorced woman commits adultery.
btw nsic it was you who quoted M 5:31 as Jesus do support a claim of yours regarding Jesus discussing sexual relations.
5:31 Speaks specifically about "anyone" divorcing "his wife" and giving her a certificate. Not a single word about sexual relations.
Just like he never said a word about homosexual relations.
"Holy Scripture: A book sent down from heaven.... Holy Scriptures contain all that a Christian should know and believe, provided he adds to it a million or so commentaries.
[Voltaire]
No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says: He is always convinced that it says what he means.
George Bernard Shaw
[Voltaire]
No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says: He is always convinced that it says what he means.
George Bernard Shaw
-
noshameinChrist
- Apprentice
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 9:50 am
- Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Re: Is homosexuality worse than heterosexual infidelity?
Post #124If I might ask, which of the NT books would you say a Christian should follow if they wished to follow Jesus?Goat wrote:noshameinChrist wrote:As I have said already, I believe Christ has spoken on the subject. This was done through at least of one of his apostles - Paul (Roman 1:27). In addition, when Christ spoke of the subject of sexual relationships it was always between a man and a woman (e.g. Matthew 5:31ff). You simply are wrong my friend.Allahakbar wrote:And if you wish to claim christianity and to follow the teachings of christ and christ makes absolutely no mention of homosexuality then you by rejecting homosexuality on the basis of christs teachings are committing HERESY.noshameinChrist wrote: [Replying to post 106 by KCKID]
Actually, your question is not frustrating at all (at least not for me - as a Christian). I do think however that it is steeped in absolute rejection of scripture. I think you know that scripture opposes homosexual relationships.
I think it is more courageous to simply say "I reject this" instead of bantering about with insincere questions about whether Jesus specifically and expressly condemns homosexual relationships.
Bottom line, it is your CHOICE whether or not to follow Christ. Nobody can take that right to choose away from you. I personally would encourage to follow Christ, but I realize I cannot make you do it.
The Bible teach that at one time period God overlooked ignorance, but now he commands all men to repent (Acts 17:30). Whether or not you understand or believe this will not make it any less true.
Do you follow christ's teaching?
Funny how Paul never actually met the earthly Jesus, but knew SO much about what he wanted.
I rather suspect that most people who claim to be Christian follow Paul more than Jesus.
-
Allahakbar
- Banned

- Posts: 499
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 10:47 am
Re: Is homosexuality worse than heterosexual infidelity?
Post #125Perhaps what Jesus is alleged to have said, seems better than what paul and john wrote.noshameinChrist wrote:If I might ask, which of the NT books would you say a Christian should follow if they wished to follow Jesus?Goat wrote:noshameinChrist wrote:As I have said already, I believe Christ has spoken on the subject. This was done through at least of one of his apostles - Paul (Roman 1:27). In addition, when Christ spoke of the subject of sexual relationships it was always between a man and a woman (e.g. Matthew 5:31ff). You simply are wrong my friend.Allahakbar wrote:And if you wish to claim christianity and to follow the teachings of christ and christ makes absolutely no mention of homosexuality then you by rejecting homosexuality on the basis of christs teachings are committing HERESY.noshameinChrist wrote: [Replying to post 106 by KCKID]
Actually, your question is not frustrating at all (at least not for me - as a Christian). I do think however that it is steeped in absolute rejection of scripture. I think you know that scripture opposes homosexual relationships.
I think it is more courageous to simply say "I reject this" instead of bantering about with insincere questions about whether Jesus specifically and expressly condemns homosexual relationships.
Bottom line, it is your CHOICE whether or not to follow Christ. Nobody can take that right to choose away from you. I personally would encourage to follow Christ, but I realize I cannot make you do it.
The Bible teach that at one time period God overlooked ignorance, but now he commands all men to repent (Acts 17:30). Whether or not you understand or believe this will not make it any less true.
Do you follow christ's teaching?
Funny how Paul never actually met the earthly Jesus, but knew SO much about what he wanted.
I rather suspect that most people who claim to be Christian follow Paul more than Jesus.
"Holy Scripture: A book sent down from heaven.... Holy Scriptures contain all that a Christian should know and believe, provided he adds to it a million or so commentaries.
[Voltaire]
No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says: He is always convinced that it says what he means.
George Bernard Shaw
[Voltaire]
No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says: He is always convinced that it says what he means.
George Bernard Shaw
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Is homosexuality worse than heterosexual infidelity?
Post #126noshameinChrist wrote:If I might ask, which of the NT books would you say a Christian should follow if they wished to follow Jesus?Goat wrote:noshameinChrist wrote:As I have said already, I believe Christ has spoken on the subject. This was done through at least of one of his apostles - Paul (Roman 1:27). In addition, when Christ spoke of the subject of sexual relationships it was always between a man and a woman (e.g. Matthew 5:31ff). You simply are wrong my friend.Allahakbar wrote:And if you wish to claim christianity and to follow the teachings of christ and christ makes absolutely no mention of homosexuality then you by rejecting homosexuality on the basis of christs teachings are committing HERESY.noshameinChrist wrote: [Replying to post 106 by KCKID]
Actually, your question is not frustrating at all (at least not for me - as a Christian). I do think however that it is steeped in absolute rejection of scripture. I think you know that scripture opposes homosexual relationships.
I think it is more courageous to simply say "I reject this" instead of bantering about with insincere questions about whether Jesus specifically and expressly condemns homosexual relationships.
Bottom line, it is your CHOICE whether or not to follow Christ. Nobody can take that right to choose away from you. I personally would encourage to follow Christ, but I realize I cannot make you do it.
The Bible teach that at one time period God overlooked ignorance, but now he commands all men to repent (Acts 17:30). Whether or not you understand or believe this will not make it any less true.
Do you follow christ's teaching?
Funny how Paul never actually met the earthly Jesus, but knew SO much about what he wanted.
I rather suspect that most people who claim to be Christian follow Paul more than Jesus.
It is not a matter of the book, but sifting through the books to seperate what Jesus said verses what is said about Jesus. Some, like the revelation of John, and the GOJ seem so bizarre that it's hard to take them seriously.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
-
noshameinChrist
- Apprentice
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 9:50 am
- Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Re: Is homosexuality worse than heterosexual infidelity?
Post #127Can you give me an example of what Jesus said, and an example of what is said about Jesus in the NT?Goat wrote:noshameinChrist wrote:If I might ask, which of the NT books would you say a Christian should follow if they wished to follow Jesus?Goat wrote:noshameinChrist wrote:As I have said already, I believe Christ has spoken on the subject. This was done through at least of one of his apostles - Paul (Roman 1:27). In addition, when Christ spoke of the subject of sexual relationships it was always between a man and a woman (e.g. Matthew 5:31ff). You simply are wrong my friend.Allahakbar wrote:And if you wish to claim christianity and to follow the teachings of christ and christ makes absolutely no mention of homosexuality then you by rejecting homosexuality on the basis of christs teachings are committing HERESY.noshameinChrist wrote: [Replying to post 106 by KCKID]
Actually, your question is not frustrating at all (at least not for me - as a Christian). I do think however that it is steeped in absolute rejection of scripture. I think you know that scripture opposes homosexual relationships.
I think it is more courageous to simply say "I reject this" instead of bantering about with insincere questions about whether Jesus specifically and expressly condemns homosexual relationships.
Bottom line, it is your CHOICE whether or not to follow Christ. Nobody can take that right to choose away from you. I personally would encourage to follow Christ, but I realize I cannot make you do it.
The Bible teach that at one time period God overlooked ignorance, but now he commands all men to repent (Acts 17:30). Whether or not you understand or believe this will not make it any less true.
Do you follow christ's teaching?
Funny how Paul never actually met the earthly Jesus, but knew SO much about what he wanted.
I rather suspect that most people who claim to be Christian follow Paul more than Jesus.
It is not a matter of the book, but sifting through the books to seperate what Jesus said verses what is said about Jesus. Some, like the revelation of John, and the GOJ seem so bizarre that it's hard to take them seriously.
-
Allahakbar
- Banned

- Posts: 499
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 10:47 am
Re: Is homosexuality worse than heterosexual infidelity?
Post #128IMHO that is simply disingenuous. I mean come on.noshameinChrist wrote:Can you give me an example of what Jesus said, and an example of what is said about Jesus in the NT?Goat wrote:noshameinChrist wrote:If I might ask, which of the NT books would you say a Christian should follow if they wished to follow Jesus?Goat wrote:noshameinChrist wrote:As I have said already, I believe Christ has spoken on the subject. This was done through at least of one of his apostles - Paul (Roman 1:27). In addition, when Christ spoke of the subject of sexual relationships it was always between a man and a woman (e.g. Matthew 5:31ff). You simply are wrong my friend.Allahakbar wrote:And if you wish to claim christianity and to follow the teachings of christ and christ makes absolutely no mention of homosexuality then you by rejecting homosexuality on the basis of christs teachings are committing HERESY.noshameinChrist wrote: [Replying to post 106 by KCKID]
Actually, your question is not frustrating at all (at least not for me - as a Christian). I do think however that it is steeped in absolute rejection of scripture. I think you know that scripture opposes homosexual relationships.
I think it is more courageous to simply say "I reject this" instead of bantering about with insincere questions about whether Jesus specifically and expressly condemns homosexual relationships.
Bottom line, it is your CHOICE whether or not to follow Christ. Nobody can take that right to choose away from you. I personally would encourage to follow Christ, but I realize I cannot make you do it.
The Bible teach that at one time period God overlooked ignorance, but now he commands all men to repent (Acts 17:30). Whether or not you understand or believe this will not make it any less true.
Do you follow christ's teaching?
Funny how Paul never actually met the earthly Jesus, but knew SO much about what he wanted.
I rather suspect that most people who claim to be Christian follow Paul more than Jesus.
It is not a matter of the book, but sifting through the books to seperate what Jesus said verses what is said about Jesus. Some, like the revelation of John, and the GOJ seem so bizarre that it's hard to take them seriously.
"Holy Scripture: A book sent down from heaven.... Holy Scriptures contain all that a Christian should know and believe, provided he adds to it a million or so commentaries.
[Voltaire]
No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says: He is always convinced that it says what he means.
George Bernard Shaw
[Voltaire]
No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says: He is always convinced that it says what he means.
George Bernard Shaw
-
noshameinChrist
- Apprentice
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 9:50 am
- Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Re: Is homosexuality worse than heterosexual infidelity?
Post #129huh?Allahakbar wrote:IMHO that is simply disingenuous. I mean come on.noshameinChrist wrote:Can you give me an example of what Jesus said, and an example of what is said about Jesus in the NT?Goat wrote:noshameinChrist wrote:If I might ask, which of the NT books would you say a Christian should follow if they wished to follow Jesus?Goat wrote:noshameinChrist wrote:As I have said already, I believe Christ has spoken on the subject. This was done through at least of one of his apostles - Paul (Roman 1:27). In addition, when Christ spoke of the subject of sexual relationships it was always between a man and a woman (e.g. Matthew 5:31ff). You simply are wrong my friend.Allahakbar wrote:And if you wish to claim christianity and to follow the teachings of christ and christ makes absolutely no mention of homosexuality then you by rejecting homosexuality on the basis of christs teachings are committing HERESY.noshameinChrist wrote: [Replying to post 106 by KCKID]
Actually, your question is not frustrating at all (at least not for me - as a Christian). I do think however that it is steeped in absolute rejection of scripture. I think you know that scripture opposes homosexual relationships.
I think it is more courageous to simply say "I reject this" instead of bantering about with insincere questions about whether Jesus specifically and expressly condemns homosexual relationships.
Bottom line, it is your CHOICE whether or not to follow Christ. Nobody can take that right to choose away from you. I personally would encourage to follow Christ, but I realize I cannot make you do it.
The Bible teach that at one time period God overlooked ignorance, but now he commands all men to repent (Acts 17:30). Whether or not you understand or believe this will not make it any less true.
Do you follow christ's teaching?
Funny how Paul never actually met the earthly Jesus, but knew SO much about what he wanted.
I rather suspect that most people who claim to be Christian follow Paul more than Jesus.
It is not a matter of the book, but sifting through the books to seperate what Jesus said verses what is said about Jesus. Some, like the revelation of John, and the GOJ seem so bizarre that it's hard to take them seriously.
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Is homosexuality worse than heterosexual infidelity?
Post #130noshameinChrist wrote:Can you give me an example of what Jesus said, and an example of what is said about Jesus in the NT?Goat wrote:noshameinChrist wrote:If I might ask, which of the NT books would you say a Christian should follow if they wished to follow Jesus?Goat wrote:noshameinChrist wrote:As I have said already, I believe Christ has spoken on the subject. This was done through at least of one of his apostles - Paul (Roman 1:27). In addition, when Christ spoke of the subject of sexual relationships it was always between a man and a woman (e.g. Matthew 5:31ff). You simply are wrong my friend.Allahakbar wrote:And if you wish to claim christianity and to follow the teachings of christ and christ makes absolutely no mention of homosexuality then you by rejecting homosexuality on the basis of christs teachings are committing HERESY.noshameinChrist wrote: [Replying to post 106 by KCKID]
Actually, your question is not frustrating at all (at least not for me - as a Christian). I do think however that it is steeped in absolute rejection of scripture. I think you know that scripture opposes homosexual relationships.
I think it is more courageous to simply say "I reject this" instead of bantering about with insincere questions about whether Jesus specifically and expressly condemns homosexual relationships.
Bottom line, it is your CHOICE whether or not to follow Christ. Nobody can take that right to choose away from you. I personally would encourage to follow Christ, but I realize I cannot make you do it.
The Bible teach that at one time period God overlooked ignorance, but now he commands all men to repent (Acts 17:30). Whether or not you understand or believe this will not make it any less true.
Do you follow christ's teaching?
Funny how Paul never actually met the earthly Jesus, but knew SO much about what he wanted.
I rather suspect that most people who claim to be Christian follow Paul more than Jesus.
It is not a matter of the book, but sifting through the books to seperate what Jesus said verses what is said about Jesus. Some, like the revelation of John, and the GOJ seem so bizarre that it's hard to take them seriously.
You mean, the difference betweeen Matthew 25, and 1st john 1:27?
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella

