A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

User avatar
AdHoc
Guru
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:39 am
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #291

Post by AdHoc »

Nickman wrote:
AdHoc wrote:
Nickman wrote:
pokeegeorge wrote: [Replying to post 246 by Nickman]

Nickman:
According to Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane, there was a plan.
“My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me. Yet not as I will, but as you will.� “My Father, if it is not possible for this cup to be taken away unless I drink it, may your will be done.� Look, the hour has come, and the Son of Man is delivered into the hands of sinners. 46 Rise! Let us go! Here comes my betrayer!�

Sounds like a planned death doesn't it?

You are missing the vital ingredient which directly points to your own false terp:


He was sweating drops like blood in agony here, Nickman.

Speaks of a poignant and almost intolerable anxiety, the same one a soldier faces when he has to go back for the wounded in a firefight...his inherent will to survive and feel no pain, and the almost sure pain coming if he tries to save his own.

Greater love hath no man, and this includes the glory in battle. You who SHOULD know a little about killing and battle and warfare SHOULD know this very basic thing...

...the glory of war in the spiritual realm is no less vital or intensely related to life and breath.
This just furthers my point. This was planned and Jesus knew he had to commit suicide, or at least allow others to kill him. That is still suicide.
Well if thats what we're calling suicide from now on, suicide is the most beautiful demonstration of love a person can offer. To lay one's life down for others, to be mercilessly tortured, spit upon and slowly killed... I'll never look at suicide the same way again.

I wouldn't do it, i'd be tempted to fall on my own sword or jump off a tower in Gethsemene.

I'd kill myself before I ever committed suicide.
Thats if you really think a human sacrifice can actually do anything for you. I don't see how this is beautiful? A god couldn't forgive people without blood sacrifice.
Well if you believe the bible then God is Holy and sin cannot exist in His presence. In other words if I was to stand in His presence without donning some serious PPE e.g. The blood of Jesus Christ it would be better for me to swim in a Fukushima heavy water hot tub.

So yes, God in His mercy can temporarily pass over sin but at some point it needs to be washed away and, if you believe the bible, only Jesus Christ could do it.

If it wasn't beautiful it wouldn't be a common psychological theme in human story telling. I could name you at least... 8 wait 9 stories off the top of my head.

DanieltheDragon
Savant
Posts: 6224
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
Location: Charlotte
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #292

Post by DanieltheDragon »

AdHoc wrote:
Nickman wrote:
AdHoc wrote:
Nickman wrote:
pokeegeorge wrote: [Replying to post 246 by Nickman]

Nickman:
According to Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane, there was a plan.
“My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me. Yet not as I will, but as you will.� “My Father, if it is not possible for this cup to be taken away unless I drink it, may your will be done.� Look, the hour has come, and the Son of Man is delivered into the hands of sinners. 46 Rise! Let us go! Here comes my betrayer!�

Sounds like a planned death doesn't it?

You are missing the vital ingredient which directly points to your own false terp:


He was sweating drops like blood in agony here, Nickman.

Speaks of a poignant and almost intolerable anxiety, the same one a soldier faces when he has to go back for the wounded in a firefight...his inherent will to survive and feel no pain, and the almost sure pain coming if he tries to save his own.

Greater love hath no man, and this includes the glory in battle. You who SHOULD know a little about killing and battle and warfare SHOULD know this very basic thing...

...the glory of war in the spiritual realm is no less vital or intensely related to life and breath.
This just furthers my point. This was planned and Jesus knew he had to commit suicide, or at least allow others to kill him. That is still suicide.
Well if thats what we're calling suicide from now on, suicide is the most beautiful demonstration of love a person can offer. To lay one's life down for others, to be mercilessly tortured, spit upon and slowly killed... I'll never look at suicide the same way again.

I wouldn't do it, i'd be tempted to fall on my own sword or jump off a tower in Gethsemene.

I'd kill myself before I ever committed suicide.
Thats if you really think a human sacrifice can actually do anything for you. I don't see how this is beautiful? A god couldn't forgive people without blood sacrifice.
Well if you believe the bible then God is Holy and sin cannot exist in His presence. In other words if I was to stand in His presence without donning some serious PPE e.g. The blood of Jesus Christ it would be better for me to swim in a Fukushima heavy water hot tub.

So yes, God in His mercy can temporarily pass over sin but at some point it needs to be washed away and, if you believe the bible, only Jesus Christ could do it.

If it wasn't beautiful it wouldn't be a common psychological theme in human story telling. I could name you at least... 8 wait 9 stories off the top of my head.
Again not to belabor the point can god not wipe away sins without blood sacrifice?

heck if he can't be around sin why create it in the first place?

User avatar
Nickman
Site Supporter
Posts: 5443
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Idaho
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #293

Post by Nickman »

AdHoc wrote:
Well if you believe the bible then God is Holy and sin cannot exist in His presence. In other words if I was to stand in His presence without donning some serious PPE e.g. The blood of Jesus Christ it would be better for me to swim in a Fukushima heavy water hot tub.
The Bible may say that this God is Holy, but his own actions say otherwise. This God is guilty of more sin than anyone. Guess who killed more people in the Bible? Satan or God? If you guessed God then you get the grand prize of reality.
So yes, God in His mercy can temporarily pass over sin but at some point it needs to be washed away and, if you believe the bible, only Jesus Christ could do it.
Washed with blood? If you saw people performing human and animal sacrifice would you think that this is a good way to wash people's sins? This is just an idea conjured by ancient primitive people. Most cultures had their own form of sacrifice. Most cultures, as well as Judaism, used this idea to make themselves pure in the face of their God. Most cultures, even Judaism, believed that their society would be better off if they purged themselves of what they thought was "sin." Their land would prosper, they wouldn't have drought, pestilence would be abated, their crops would harvest on time. These we see in the Bible just like most cultures from that time.

If it wasn't beautiful it wouldn't be a common psychological theme in human story telling. I could name you at least... 8 wait 9 stories off the top of my head.
The idea of a person saving other people is beautiful. The idea of a person being crucified so that you can be saved from your creator is ridiculous. You don't see the ridiculousness of this?

User avatar
AdHoc
Guru
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:39 am
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #294

Post by AdHoc »

Nickman wrote:
AdHoc wrote:
Well if you believe the bible then God is Holy and sin cannot exist in His presence. In other words if I was to stand in His presence without donning some serious PPE e.g. The blood of Jesus Christ it would be better for me to swim in a Fukushima heavy water hot tub.
The Bible may say that this God is Holy, but his own actions say otherwise. This God is guilty of more sin than anyone. Guess who killed more people in the Bible? Satan or God? If you guessed God then you get the grand prize of reality.
You think killing people is a sin? You're profile says you're military??? Are you in the Salvation Army or something?
Nickman wrote:
So yes, God in His mercy can temporarily pass over sin but at some point it needs to be washed away and, if you believe the bible, only Jesus Christ could do it.
Washed with blood? If you saw people performing human and animal sacrifice would you think that this is a good way to wash people's sins? This is just an idea conjured by ancient primitive people. Most cultures had their own form of sacrifice. Most cultures, as well as Judaism, used this idea to make themselves pure in the face of their God. Most cultures, even Judaism, believed that their society would be better off if they purged themselves of what they thought was "sin." Their land would prosper, they wouldn't have drought, pestilence would be abated, their crops would harvest on time. These we see in the Bible just like most cultures from that time.

If it wasn't beautiful it wouldn't be a common psychological theme in human story telling. I could name you at least... 8 wait 9 stories off the top of my head.
The idea of a person saving other people is beautiful. The idea of a person being crucified so that you can be saved from your creator is ridiculous. You don't see the ridiculousness of this?
You're profile also says you're a former christian, if thats true, at one time you knew who God was actually saving us from.

User avatar
Nickman
Site Supporter
Posts: 5443
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Idaho
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #295

Post by Nickman »

AdHoc wrote: You think killing people is a sin? You're profile says you're military??? Are you in the Salvation Army or something?
Well I don't believe in sin per se but I am using the Biblical explanation. I am in the military, yes, but we don't kill unless it is absolutely necessary. Even then we don't act as if it was a noble thing. Killing is never "good." The biblical God, however; was quick to kill (or order it) for even the most minute issues, i.e Uzzah, unamed man picking up sticks on Sabbath, and innocent children.

You're profile also says you're a former christian, if thats true, at one time you knew who God was actually saving us from.
Who an imaginary invisible satan? Ourselves? We don't send ourselves to hell, btw.

User avatar
AdHoc
Guru
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:39 am
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #296

Post by AdHoc »

Nickman wrote:
AdHoc wrote: You think killing people is a sin? You're profile says you're military??? Are you in the Salvation Army or something?
Well I don't believe in sin per se but I am using the Biblical explanation. I am in the military, yes, but we don't kill unless it is absolutely necessary. Even then we don't act as if it was a noble thing. Killing is never "good." The biblical God, however; was quick to kill (or order it) for even the most minute issues, i.e Uzzah, unamed man picking up sticks on Sabbath, and innocent children.
Ok so the military you belong to has never killed innocent men, women and children? Even hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children?

And what biblical definition of sin says it is a sin for a police officer to kill, a soldier to kill, a judge or a king or for that matter God to kill? Who gets to decide when its ok for your unit to kill?

Do they ever get it wrong?
Nickman wrote:
You're profile also says you're a former christian, if thats true, at one time you knew who God was actually saving us from.
Who an imaginary invisible satan? Ourselves? We don't send ourselves to hell, btw.
We don't?

I have been led to believe that we have a choice. First of all it has not been established that hell even exists but lets imagine it does for a moment... Don't I have a choice to go there if I want? Are you telling me I cannot?

User avatar
Nickman
Site Supporter
Posts: 5443
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Idaho
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #297

Post by Nickman »

AdHoc wrote: Ok so the military you belong to has never killed innocent men, women and children? Even hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children?

And what biblical definition of sin says it is a sin for a police officer to kill, a soldier to kill, a judge or a king or for that matter God to kill? Who gets to decide when its ok for your unit to kill?

Do they ever get it wrong?
They get it wrong all the time. Doesn't make it right. The military is not comparable to your God. The military is not even the subject here. The military doesn't claim to be benevolent, all knowing, all powerful, and the like. If we can hold our military accou ntable, how much more should we hold your "benevolent God" accountable?

"Be therefore perfect as your father in heaven is perfect." Does this mean displaying rage, wrath, anger, jealousy, spontaneous aggressive behavior, commanding genocide, infanticide?
We don't?

I have been led to believe that we have a choice. First of all it has not been established that hell even exists but lets imagine it does for a moment... Don't I have a choice to go there if I want? Are you telling me I cannot?
Your god is supposed to be the judge of who goes and who doesn't. We cannot choose to go. He sends us. And this decision is not based on what type of person you are, but whether or not you believe that a man was raised from the dead 2000 years ago.

olavisjo
Site Supporter
Posts: 2749
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:20 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #298

Post by olavisjo »

.
Nickman wrote:
AdHoc wrote: Absolutely but we'll have to wait until the next life before I can actually show you
Good ole catch 22.
No, this is not a catch 22.

Look it up.
"I believe in no religion. There is absolutely no proof for any of them, and from a philosophical standpoint Christianity is not even the best. All religions, that is, all mythologies to give them their proper name, are merely man’s own invention..."

C.S. Lewis

DanieltheDragon
Savant
Posts: 6224
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
Location: Charlotte
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #299

Post by DanieltheDragon »

[Replying to post 296 by olavisjo]

not in the literal sense of the term.


the catch here is

a god only knowable through death exists you can only go to heaven if you believe in said god while your alive.

a rational person only believes in a god that is knowable while he/she is alive

the only way a rational person can believe god is by dying.

all rational people go to hell.

in other words

Hence, pilots who request a mental fitness evaluation are sane, and therefore must fly in combat. At the same time, if an evaluation is not requested by the pilot, he will never receive one and thus can never be found insane, meaning he must also fly in combat.


Hence, people who require a evidence for god are rational, and therefore must go to hell. At the same time, if one doesn't look for evidence , he will never receive evidence and thus will have no reason to believe , meaning all rational people must go to hell

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10034
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1223 times
Been thanked: 1621 times

Post #300

Post by Clownboat »

pokeegeorge wrote: [Replying to post 273 by Clownboat]


Ted Haggard was a hypocrite. Paul Silas is my hero.

You walk where angels fear to tread. With aplomb and debonair.

NOTHING indicates to me homosexual activity regarding Paul. But I think I may be honing in on your own divergent path of life. Denial, first of principle then of God.

Typical.

I can only assume you have confirmation bias going on. I base this off of your statement:
" Paul Silas is my hero."
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

Post Reply