A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

DanieltheDragon
Savant
Posts: 6224
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
Location: Charlotte
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #421

Post by DanieltheDragon »

fatherlearningtolove wrote: [Replying to post 416 by DanieltheDragon]

But I HAVE to believe it's true - I HAVE to live as if it were. It's the only way to ensure moral integrity.

do you have to though?

If love didn't conquer all how does that effect you?

where is the need for a conquering love coming from?

Is there a personal trauma propelling this desire?

the belief that love conquers all really has nothing to do with moral integrity. We are entities that judge whether you like it or not. for example I judge grapefruit to have a better flavor than granny smith apples. We shouldn't fear judging it is part and parcel to our experience. The trick is limiting harm in other words expressing a judgment can cause harm and therefore should remain left unsaid.

love will never conquer the heart of a sociopath. they will 100% of the time behave in their best interest the part of the brain that is associated with concepts of empathy are greatly diminished.

Sometimes it's nature and no amount of nurture can change this.

I agree though
there are reasons they are that way. They weren't born in a vacuum - they were influenced by their upbringing.
holds true in a lot of cases perhaps the majority even.

my morality is based on maximizing good to those around me and minimizing harm. love can be part of it but it isn't the whole thing.

I think we all struggle with hard questions like that. As a religious person you have to deal with having a non-intervening god, as an atheist you have to deal with the potential for evil that exists within our own minds as a species. these are not simple questions.

fatherlearningtolove
Apprentice
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:33 pm
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Contact:

Post #422

Post by fatherlearningtolove »

DanieltheDragon wrote:
fatherlearningtolove wrote: [Replying to post 416 by DanieltheDragon]

But I HAVE to believe it's true - I HAVE to live as if it were. It's the only way to ensure moral integrity.

do you have to though?
Here, let me demonstrate why:
DanieltheDragon wrote: love will never conquer the heart of a sociopath. they will 100% of the time behave in their best interest the part of the brain that is associated with concepts of empathy are greatly diminished.
So who gets to decide who qualifies as beyond hope? Who gets to decide that sweet Jenny's son Robby is a sociopath and thus beyond hope? Who's going to tell her to give up on her son?

Everyone has someone that cares about them. Even Hitler had someone who cared about him. And I bet, if I were able to go back in time and meet everyone he knew, someone in that circle of people who cared about him was actually a decent person. So who gets to tell the people who love the sociopaths that their beloved sociopaths are beyond hope?
"The tree is known by its fruits. If you want to understand the social and political history of modern man, study hell."
- Thomas Merton, "New Seeds of Contemplation"

My blog

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #423

Post by JohnA »

fatherlearningtolove wrote:
JohnA wrote: Your dogma has just been shown wrong by yourself, yet you hammer on it.

Even your NT is full of contradictions, even your Jesus was a fraud.

Want to take me on and discuss that, show you how ALL of it is myth?
You have much anger. I am sorry you have been hurt so much.

You ever seen a trial? You know what happens when you have a bunch of eyewitnesses? Their stories do not match. There are contradictions and differences. If there weren't, you know what they call that? Corroboration. And it's the best tip off that a set-up is going on. When the stories match perfectly, they know the witnesses all talked to each other and made sure they all had their stories straight.

Yeah, there are contradictions in the New Testament. That strengthens the case that there actually was a figure named Jesus who lived during that time period. Many, many histories, Christian and non-Christian, believe that there was such a character. They don't all agree on what exactly he did or said or who exactly he was. But they are all convinced that he lived and had an effect on history.
You have not answered any of my questions.

It is always quite amusing that people claim to believe that they know my beliefs.
You have already shown your dogma contradictory. To continue with this dogma is self-refuting; how would any reader believe this rubbish after you confirmed it as such?

Biblical scholars are not agreement on the historicity of this Jesus guy. There is zero evidence for the divinity of the Jesus figure. To say there is, is actually just another fallacious dogma claim, born is hypocrisy. The lack of the burden of proof is shining though. Without the evidence for the divinity claim this divine historical Jesus is a myth, showing that the bible historicity claim is in the same category; myth.

This circular drivel of your dogma is inherently flawed, arguing both sides of the coin is laughable. To argue that contradictions is somewhat confirmation of the claimed truth is a statement of ignorance born in delusion and fideism.

Am convinced you can do better.
Last edited by JohnA on Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #424

Post by JohnA »

fatherlearningtolove wrote: [Replying to post 404 by Choir Loft]

Dude. You're not helping. You really think that insisting to someone who has been hurt by the church that they REPENT!!!! SINNER!!!! You really think that's going to have a positive effect? This is the reason why the church is dying. This is the reason for the "rise of the nones". You're not helping.

How do you KNOW that I have been hurt by the church? Pretending to KNOW my beliefs? Seems like your dogma teaches to confuse wishful thinking with knowledge claims. How is that not repulsive?

Are you some Jesus, able to read minds, able to KNOW my historical experiences?

Please back up your claims, or retract them. It is your choice, not mine.

User avatar
Stan
Scholar
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: Calgary

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #425

Post by Stan »

marketandchurch wrote: This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

How exactly do you purport to understand or judge God if you don't know Him or have a relationship with His Son? Goodness is NOT the issue with Eternal Punishment. The bottom line is we are accept Jesus as our savior and go from there. It's like a membership in ANY club. You fulfill the requirements and you can join. If you don't you can't.
Not accepting God's plan with your own limited concept of morality really means nothing. God is absolute as are His decrees and commands. You may have the freedom to disagree but with that freedom comes culpability. I am free to speed down a road, but if I get caught, I pay the price. Nobody inherits Eternal Life because they are good enough. They inherit Eternal Life because they believe and obey what God says. Faith is engine of a Christians belief, NOT goodness.
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
2 Tim 2:15
8-)

User avatar
Danmark
Site Supporter
Posts: 12697
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
Location: Seattle
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #426

Post by Danmark »

Stan wrote: How exactly do you purport to understand or judge God if you don't know Him or have a relationship with His Son? Goodness is NOT the issue with Eternal Punishment. The bottom line is we are accept Jesus as our savior and go from there. It's like a membership in ANY club. You fulfill the requirements and you can join. If you don't you can't.
Not accepting God's plan with your own limited concept of morality really means nothing. God is absolute as are His decrees and commands. You may have the freedom to disagree but with that freedom comes culpability. I am free to speed down a road, but if I get caught, I pay the price. Nobody inherits Eternal Life because they are good enough. They inherit Eternal Life because they believe and obey what God says. Faith is engine of a Christians belief, NOT goodness.
This makes almost as much sense as a story line from Superman Comics. IF we accept the premise that Superman is affected differently by variously colored chunks of Kryptonite, then the story line makes sense if it is well written and follows the premise.

The problem is that the existence of Superman who came to Earth as Jor-El's son Kal-El from the planet Krypton is exactly as valid as the premise there is a god and he had a son who he sent to Earth.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #427

Post by JohnA »

Stan wrote:
marketandchurch wrote: This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

How exactly do you purport to understand or judge God if you don't know Him or have a relationship with His Son? Goodness is NOT the issue with Eternal Punishment. The bottom line is we are accept Jesus as our savior and go from there. It's like a membership in ANY club. You fulfill the requirements and you can join. If you don't you can't.
Not accepting God's plan with your own limited concept of morality really means nothing. God is absolute as are His decrees and commands. You may have the freedom to disagree but with that freedom comes culpability. I am free to speed down a road, but if I get caught, I pay the price. Nobody inherits Eternal Life because they are good enough. They inherit Eternal Life because they believe and obey what God says. Faith is engine of a Christians belief, NOT goodness.

Two questions:
1) How do I get saved?
2) From what do I need to get saved from?

User avatar
Stan
Scholar
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: Calgary

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #428

Post by Stan »

[Replying to post 424 by JohnA]

1) Rom 10:9-10
If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,� and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved.

2) Rom 6:23
The wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Simple, and straight forward.
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
2 Tim 2:15
8-)

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #429

Post by JohnA »

Stan wrote: [Replying to post 424 by JohnA]

1) Rom 10:9-10
If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,� and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved.

2) Rom 6:23
The wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Simple, and straight forward.
1) So I need to give up part of my critical faculties to believe a myth for which there is only evidence that it is a myth?

2) So, I need to get saved from "sin" that your god knowingly created?

You are saying I need to be saved from your god by giving up something?

That does not sound right to me. How is that coherent?

User avatar
Stan
Scholar
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: Calgary

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #430

Post by Stan »

[Replying to post 426 by JohnA]

1) Yes and He's NOT a myth. Why ask if all you want to do is argue your mindset?

2) God didn't create sin, man did when he/she decided to DISOBEY His command.

No that is NOT what I said...please try not to prevaricate.

Are you the author of right and wrong? It is as coherent as you want it to be.
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
2 Tim 2:15
8-)

Post Reply