Human sacrifice

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Zzyzx
Site Supporter
Posts: 25089
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
Location: Bible Belt USA
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 73 times

Human sacrifice

Post #1

Post by Zzyzx »

.
Christians often condemn human sacrifice and use it as justification for slaughtering competing religious groups and societies.

However, Christians glorify the sacrifice (called "martyrdom") of their namesake and other religious notables. Supposedly the "martyrdom" was often done willingly "to serve god."

How is that different from "pagan" sacrifices to their "gods?"
.
Non-Theist

ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence

User avatar
Divine Insight
Savant
Posts: 18070
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Here & Now
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Human sacrifice

Post #121

Post by Divine Insight »

HammerofGrace wrote: [Replying to post 113 by Divine Insight]

I don't have time to reply to your entire counterpoint but I see quickly one point that is just flat out wrong:
Look especially at verse 8.

He is telling his disciples to heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, and raise the dead.

So why aren't there entire accounts of these disciples going around performing the same kind of miracles as Jesus? Think

Christianity plays this down. They can't have all these disciples running around performing the very same kinds of miracles that Jesus performed.
From Acts of the Apostles, Chapter 3

(1)Now Peter and John went up together into the temple at the hour of prayer, being the ninth hour.
(2)And a certain man lame from his mother's womb was carried, whom they laid daily at the gate of the temple which is called Beautiful, to ask alms of them that entered into the temple;
(3)Who seeing Peter and John about to go into the temple asked an alms.
(4)And Peter, fastening his eyes upon him with John, said, Look on us.
(5)And he gave heed unto them, expecting to receive something of them.
(6)Then Peter said, Silver and gold have I none; but such as I have give I thee: In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth rise up and walk.
(7)And he took him by the right hand, and lifted him up: and immediately his feet and ankle bones received strength.


And so there are accounts of miracles performed by the disciples after Jesus' death so I'm unsure what it is that Christians are playing down?

In any event I have shown proof that what you said is a lie so by your previous logic that means that everything you say is a lie, am I correct?
That's not separate accounts. That's right in the same gospels written by the same authors.

If these disciples went off on their own after Jesus had died and continued to perform the same kinds of miracles that Jesus has performed then we should see totally separate and independent "Gospels" being written about the lives of these men and the miracles that they had performed totally independent of these story of Jesus. But no such independent stories exist.

So clearly it's the authors of these Gospel rumors where are lying.

Where has anyone else seen these things outside of these Gospel rumors? :-k

It's crystal clear that these biblical myths of Jesus are totally self-contained and if any attempt to substantiate them from outside of these myths if always futile.

These disciples clearly could not have been going around performing miracles like these Gospel rumors claim.

This is why it is "Played down". Sure there are a few mentions within the same myths that are written by the same authors but they are very few and unimpressive. But no one is willing to take this on for real because there are not independent reports of verifications of these things outside of these very myths.

You can't use a myth to support itself.
[center]Image
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]

HammerofGrace
Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:35 pm

Re: Human sacrifice

Post #122

Post by HammerofGrace »

[Replying to post 120 by Divine Insight]

You quoted the book of Matthew, I quoted a non-gospel book written by Luke. Yes, Luke wrote the Gospel of Luke and the Book of Acts but he didn't write Matthew's gospel. I think you may even agree with that statement.

If you are asking about historical evidence of these miracles (and there are many in the Book of Acts), what exactly would you like to see? There is almost no written history from that period and I assume you know that? You can believe or not believe that is your prerogative but to imply that because they can't be proven outside of biblical sources makes them fairy tales is incorrect. As you know Acts and Matthew were written by two separate authors at separate times and if this wasn't the Bible we were talking about it would be accepted as gospel. Pun intended.

User avatar
Divine Insight
Savant
Posts: 18070
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Here & Now
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Human sacrifice

Post #123

Post by Divine Insight »

HammerofGrace wrote: [Replying to post 120 by Divine Insight]

You quoted the book of Matthew, I quoted a non-gospel book written by Luke. Yes, Luke wrote the Gospel of Luke and the Book of Acts but he didn't write Matthew's gospel. I think you may even agree with that statement.

If you are asking about historical evidence of these miracles (and there are many in the Book of Acts), what exactly would you like to see? There is almost no written history from that period and I assume you know that? You can believe or not believe that is your prerogative but to imply that because they can't be proven outside of biblical sources makes them fairy tales is incorrect. As you know Acts and Matthew were written by two separate authors at separate times and if this wasn't the Bible we were talking about it would be accepted as gospel. Pun intended.
The entire New Testament was only written by a handful of people. Most of which clearly used and referred to the writings and rumors of the other authors.

Even if these stories were intelligent they wouldn't be convincing. The fact that they are also extremely ignorant and make God out to be a complete idiot is more than enough reason to dismiss them.

You ask me what I would like to see. Well the first thing I would like to see are intelligent stories about an intelligent God. The Bible fails miserably on that point alone. But then in addition to that requirement I would still like to see some sort of historical evidence beyond a handful of superstitious men who were clearly copying from each others works.

Do you realize that all of Christianity rests upon the superstitious rumors told by a mere handful of men?

Have you ever asked why an omnipotent God couldn't do better than that?

And then he's threatening to condemn you if you don't believe this utter stupidity?

As far as I'm concerned that gives away the scam right there. There's no God behind this religion.
[center]Image
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]

HammerofGrace
Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:35 pm

Re: Human sacrifice

Post #124

Post by HammerofGrace »

[Replying to post 122 by Divine Insight]
As far as I'm concerned that gives away the scam right there. There's no God behind this religion.
Please advise which religion(s) has a God behind it.

Thank you.

Zzyzx
Site Supporter
Posts: 25089
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
Location: Bible Belt USA
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 73 times

Re: Human sacrifice

Post #125

Post by Zzyzx »

.
HammerofGrace wrote: Please advise which religion(s) has a God behind it.
There is no assurance that ANY religion has a "god behind it" -- or worships a "god" that is anything more than the product of human imagination.

Those who propose / promote god-worship should be responsible for providing evidence that their favorite "god" is real.
.
Non-Theist

ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence

Zzyzx
Site Supporter
Posts: 25089
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
Location: Bible Belt USA
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 73 times

Re: Human sacrifice

Post #126

Post by Zzyzx »

.
HammerofGrace wrote: You quoted the book of Matthew, I quoted a non-gospel book written by Luke. Yes, Luke wrote the Gospel of Luke and the Book of Acts but he didn't write Matthew's gospel.
Who, exactly, was "Luke" – what, exactly, were his sources of information?

HammerofGrace wrote: If you are asking about historical evidence of these miracles (and there are many in the Book of Acts), what exactly would you like to see?
Let's start with anything more than tales that someone saw something they considered miraculous.
HammerofGrace wrote: There is almost no written history from that period and I assume you know that?
There are actually contemporary accounts from the era and Roman records – HOWEVER, none seem to mention dead bodies coming back to life and such things (on which Christianity is based).
HammerofGrace wrote: You can believe or not believe that is your prerogative but to imply that because they can't be proven outside of biblical sources makes them fairy tales is incorrect.
Agreed that bible tales have not been proven to be fairytales. Neither have tales about Little Red Riding Hood and Peter Pan been PROVED to be false. Shall we, therefore, accept tales of LRR and PP to be truthful and accurate?
.
Non-Theist

ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence

User avatar
Divine Insight
Savant
Posts: 18070
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Here & Now
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Human sacrifice

Post #127

Post by Divine Insight »

HammerofGrace wrote: [Replying to post 122 by Divine Insight]
As far as I'm concerned that gives away the scam right there. There's no God behind this religion.
Please advise which religion(s) has a God behind it.

Thank you.
Insofar as I'm aware none of them do.

However, there do at least exist some spiritual philosophies that are respectable and could potentially be describing a plausible God. Hebrew mythology is certainly not one of them.

And we must all confess, whether we like it or not, that the atheists could be right. ;)

To refuse to confess this can be nothing more than flat-out denial.
[center]Image
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10038
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1228 times
Been thanked: 1621 times

Re: Human sacrifice

Post #128

Post by Clownboat »

HammerofGrace wrote: [Replying to post 122 by Divine Insight]
As far as I'm concerned that gives away the scam right there. There's no God behind this religion.
Please advise which religion(s) has a God behind it.

Thank you.
I have never been shown a religion that has a god behind it as far as can be reasonably determined.
This reasonably determines for me that all religions are man made and have men behind them.

Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Human sacrifice

Post #129

Post by ttruscott »

Zzyzx wrote: .
1213 wrote: He who believes in him is not judged. He who doesn't believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the one and only Son of God. This is the judgment . . . .


In other words, all one must do to be "not judged" (evidently to achieve "salvation") is to believe in God / Jesus. Right?

It doesn't matter what a person DOES -- only what they believe. Right?

If they believe, ask forgiveness and repent (according to some Christians) that is all which is required to get a ticket to heaven in the proposed "afterlife." Right?


Right!!! Only, so obviously you miss the rational that makes this a perfect system...

You make "un-belief" as nothing, as 'what a meaningless concept to merit everlasting hell!' But because UNBELIEF was the CAUSE of all the other evil beliefs and addictions that have caused ALL the suffering here on earth and in heaven, it is the epitomé of all evil.

Peace, Ted
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

Post Reply