arian wrote:
Blastcat wrote:
No, I didn't throw you in with the creationists. If you talk LIKE a creationist.. sorry... It's only reasonable to call you one. Because if your beliefs match THEIR beliefs.. then you are a match....
Hay thanks Blastcat for that long response, I will try to sum it up ok?
Googled it:
Like evolution, creationism can have more than one meaning. At its most basic, creationism is the belief that the universe was created by a deity of some sort - but after that, there is quite a lot of variety among creationists as to just what they believe and why. People may lump all creationists together in one group, but it is important to understand where they differ and why. Not every critique of creationism and creationist ideology will apply equally well to all creationists.
here are the 6 basic ones:
1. Scientific Creationism
2. Flat earth Creationism
3. Young Earth Creationism
4. Old Earth Creationism
5. Theistic Evolution & Evolutionary Creationism
6. Intelligent Design Creationism
- At its most basic, creationism is the belief that the universe was created by a deity of some sort
Well no, you see not even at its most basic definition of creationism does my understanding of creationism being defined here, since man can only understand God through some religious doctrine. My God, the God of the Bible, the One who Created everything and that's why He is called the 'Creator' is Not, .. I repeat
is not a deity.. I explain, but how could you understand when you tag me with definitions that were created by thousands of years of heavy religious indoctrinations.
Again, look at your next answer:
Blastcat wrote:arian wrote:I have explained that my understanding of God is based on scientific observation rather than 'religion', remember? Religion requires that you believe in their interpretation of God on faith alone, they even admit that their god/gods are not comparable/comparable to any 'scientific explanation', nor could their god/gods be explained through science.
Science doesn't go around proving god, so I have no idea what kind of science you would HAVE that proves a god. Creationists believe in a creator god and DENY evolution, just the way you do. You do the same as creationists
you see the bolded part? I rest my case. Maybe in 20, or 30 years from now as more scientific study goes into defining the mind/consciousness, someone will come across my debates and say: "Oh my God, this guy had it all right 30 years ago, but no one could understand him!?"
Blastcat wrote:And they also claim to use science.. that's the same as you.
(I thought you just said:
"Science doesn't go around proving god, so I have no idea what kind of science you would HAVE that proves a god?") but never mind, ..
I claim to know and explain God, the same God and Creator as in the Bible through science.
Georges Lemaitre explained a 'creator' through science, and he believed in God, the same God in the Bible, or so he claimed.
My God is as I did my best in defining Him more accurately, is
the Infinite, Eternal Creative Mind/Spirit "I Am Who I Am", .. while
Lemaitre understood god as
a deity, or the result of some multi-god-plural-deities ideology like the one mentioned in the Bible, "Legion". But oh well, it's all the same to you, right?
So, arian says God, Lemaitre says God, .. so god, god, god, .. it's all the same, right?
arian reads the Bible, Lemaitre reads the Bible, which makes them religious, .. unless you play tennis every day before work for exactly one hour religiously, then you are also religious, only not that kind of religious, you know, the god-type! .. who cares about the details, as long as you leave God out of it.
arian claims to be Christian, .. Lemaitre claims to be Christian, only because Lemaitre leaves God out of his Big-bang evolution scientific observation, he is a real scientist, .. but arian doesn't leave God or the Bible out of his observation, nor does he have a degree in science, so he has no right to claim his observation as scientific. Besides, what does arian's mind separate from the brain has to do anything with science or the existence of the universe? Especially the definition of the word 'infinity'? What does infinite have anything to do with God, the mind, or the universe?
arian claims he understands how the universe appeared through scientific observation, .. Lemaitre claims and explains how he believes the universe appeared through science (he doesn't claim by 'scientific observation', only by science) but hey science is science, who cares about the minute details like observed science or billion year old stories claimed as science, right? Because:
Mentioning the word 'God' is automatically religion, because the only way you can talk about God, or Creator, or Creation is from religion, and that's that. Now arian, if you wish to leave out any reference to the Bible, or God, or Creator, or even the word 'creation', then we will consider your scientific study, you know, like Lemaitre did.
"So arian, .. can you define a god for us through science that has nothing to do with 'creation', or 'God', .. well er, .. you know, that God, or the Bible, or Christianity, or Jesus, unless you mean that other Jesus, you know, the son of the morning Lucifer one that the Jesuit priests are waiting and watching for to come out of the sun with their LUCIFER telescope lens!?"
Blastcat wrote:You and they use the same arguments.. the same failed logic.
Yes, I agree to the failed logic, the same-o religious thinking.
This really is futile since it seems that no one is able to go beyond religious thinking. Everything has to be within religious context or it doesn't seem to make sense??
Blastcat wrote:Scientific observation proves your god exists? .. HOW? YOU NEED TO TELL US HOW?.. if you have no HOW.. then you have not made a CASE AT ALL..
You SAID that you observe the universe and that makes it CLEAR TO YOU that a creator exists.. no explanation.. just an assertion..
Oh Lordie! ..How, Really? How many times do I explain it?
I read someone say:
"Look, things are being pulled to the ground, I seen this apple fall out of the tree and an idea came to me, I call it gravity!"
"Assertion after assertion Newton, show us this, .. this what do you call it, aahh .. gravity? LOL! Hey guys, Newton seen gravity pull an apple to the ground, but we asked him to show us, but all he ever does is make wild assertions! He, he, he."