Therefore, what consensus is there for any evidence for a soul(s)? As the existence of the soul is very central to any belief or religion.
(my first post

Moderator: Moderators
I asked him the same thing. Let me know if he ever answers you. Where is this physical person that "survives death"?JehovahsWitness wrote:Yes indeed he did. What he did NOT say is that humans survive beyond the grave, that was you, which is why I'm asking (you not Paul) to explain yourself.hoghead1 wrote: [Replying to post 226 by JehovahsWitness]
Biblically, you would have to ask Paul that. He said we will all be resurrected with a new, superdooper body.
If you believe the soul is entirely physical and that a soul is the whole person, and that the whole person survives death and continues living (as a soul/whole person) "beyond the grave" then how is this possible when the physical body ceases to exist as such with death? My issue is not with Paul's point of dying (and coming back to life later). My issue is with yours that one doesn't die at all but lives on "beyond the grave".
Right so, where is the soul (the whole physical person) that according to you "surivives" (lives on without being destroyed) beyond the grave? You were the one that mentioned "atoms" when I was asking about the soul, not me. I'm just trying to clear the fog of your belief that the soul is the whole physical person that at the same time survives beyond the grave which by definition is the end of the whole physical person.hoghead1 wrote: The "atoms" left in a corpse are not the same atoms that were there when that guy was alive.
No. The body can be killed by men. But the "soul," which is the whole person, cannot be killed off by man, because even if they kill the body, God remembers that person and everything about him/her and can bring them back to life. The men who kill the body don't have any control over the complete person and the life that person will gain back in the future.JLB32168 wrote:If one’s body can be lost while the soul is saved, which Christ said, then it would seem that the two can indeed be separated.onewithhim wrote: Nowhere does the Bible say that the soul exists eternally or separates from the body!
So the body can be killed, but the soul remains alive, but the soul isn’t immaterial?onewithhim wrote:The body can be killed by men. But the "soul," which is the whole person, cannot be killed off by man, because even if they kill the body, God remembers that person and everything about him/her and can bring them back to life.
Okay – so they burn the body and reduce it to ashes.onewithhim wrote:The men who kill the body don't have any control over the complete person and the life that person will gain back in the future.
No I did not imply that the soul remains alive if the body is killed. If the body is killed the soul is also dead, because the soul is the complete person. "Gehenna" is the word Jesus used to describe what God CAN do if He so chooses----obliterate a person PERMANENTLY. That is what "Gehenna" refers to---total annihilation. God is to be feared more than mere man because man can merely kill the body. God can DESTROY the person forever and never bring him back---that's what "Gehenna" means.JLB32168 wrote:So the body can be killed, but the soul remains alive, but the soul isn’t immaterial?onewithhim wrote:The body can be killed by men. But the "soul," which is the whole person, cannot be killed off by man, because even if they kill the body, God remembers that person and everything about him/her and can bring them back to life.
When someone kills the body, what happens to the soul – since it hasn’t been killed off? What does “killed off� mean as contrasted against a simple “killed?�
Okay – so they burn the body and reduce it to ashes.onewithhim wrote:The men who kill the body don't have any control over the complete person and the life that person will gain back in the future.
Where’s the soul – since it hasn’t been killed off?
You said earlier that you believe the soul to be the PERSON and that the person is wholly physical. Now if that person goes through "intermittent existence", are you saying they exists, then doesn't exist and then exists again? If so when they don't exist wouldn't you call that them being dead? If they cease to exist, how is that "living beyond the grave"?hoghead1 wrote: I think of the soul, as the body, as having an intermittent existence.
So I take it that when the soul is a "perishing" equates with the above period when it doesn't exist. Usually when a person ceases to exist we call that being dead. How can you be dead (not exist) and also be spoken of as living "beyond the grave".hoghead1 wrote:
So there is the soul at time one. Then a perishing ..
But these new bodies are not flesh.hoghead1 wrote: [Replying to post 239 by JLB32168]
Christ never preached anything like that. If, for example, you look at I Cor. 15, we live on in new bodies, not as something disembodied.