Therefore, what consensus is there for any evidence for a soul(s)? As the existence of the soul is very central to any belief or religion.
(my first post
Moderator: Moderators
Count me in.Talishi wrote:What I mean is a chat situation, where everyone is posting live. I remember the dynamic of having "enemies" on Usenet (similar to this forum format) chatting live, and you feel like you have to deal with them in a much different way, with much more respect.hoghead1 wrote: [Replying to post 267 by Talishi]Interesting. But what exactly do you mean by real time? Face to face? Part of the problem in these discussion groups is that everyone is largely anonymous, all net nyms, etc.
Sadly, she is a poster who doesn't wish to even tolerate what I say in my posts and put me on "ignore" before I ever did that to anybody. I asked her valid questions and then asked why she didn't answer them. Then she snapped, "I click a certain button and solve both our problems."Checkpoint wrote:I thought she made an interesting observation, and just wanted to acknowledge that with my playful word.hoghead1 wrote: [Replying to post 260 by Checkpoint]
Making rude remarks such as "Haha" don't belong in a serious theological discussion. You should be more respectful. She does in fact have a perfectly valid case based on Matthew 27: 50 on. If you 9iwsh to provide some alternative, you are free to do so, which you have yet to do.
How easily one can be misunderstod when not face to face.
I intended no disrespect or rudeness, I think Talishi is a thinker who has written very good posts.
Therefore I have deleted that remark.
But obviously you don't believe that your baby that is now a young man actually died and is not living (surviving) beyond the grave. So how does this "constant state of death and rebirth" differ from the event that would necessitate that one begins to "live beyond the grave" to do? (biblically the event you claim continues with one "living beyone the grave" is called "death")hoghead1 wrote: I thought I already explained about our existence being intermittent, in another post. Just in case I didn't, yes, you could say that we are in a constant state of death and rebirth.
It might make sense to you but I am failing to see the relevance to the question of what happens to a person when they are DEAD.hoghead1 wrote: [Replying to post 276 by JehovahsWitness]
I am simply saying that we naturally go through a death and rebirth moment to moment. It would be arbitrary to stop this at the grave. So the biblical claim for life in the hereafter makes great sense to me.
Yeah, it's really too bad when people come to debate, and then ignore the people who desire to debate. I wonder what it is about what I write that is so intolerable to those who have ignored me?onewithhim wrote:
Sadly, she is a poster who doesn't wish to even tolerate what I say in my posts and put me on "ignore" before I ever did that to anybody.