Heaven & the Resurrection

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 23456
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 930 times
Been thanked: 1349 times
Contact:

Heaven & the Resurrection

Post #1

Post by JehovahsWitness »

Many believe that the righteous men and women from bible times such as Abraham, died and went to heaven.

If that is the case for you, how do you reconcile this with the idea of a future resurrection on "the last day"? What do you think this refers to.
JOHN 11: 24
Martha answered, "I know he will rise again in the resurrection at the last day."
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 11114
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1581 times
Been thanked: 471 times

Post #81

Post by onewithhim »

Donray wrote: Everybody needs to be politically correct and stop using words anyone objects too even though it is a good words.

We must use weasel words to get around words that have an actual meaning.

For example some people object to brainwashing and therefore never be used could people supply a list words that mean the some thing but would be acceptable?
Why quibble over words like "brainwashing"? It is the sentiment behind words like that that is the problem. You say I am "brainwashed" into believing in God because of my upbringing. I don't think that is true. I was also taught about hell-fire all of my formative years, but I never accepted it. So....God I accepted, hell-fire I did not. How can you consider me "brainwashed"? Obviously I reasoned on the matter and came to my own conclusions. Using reason is not brainwashing.

Monta
Guru
Posts: 2029
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2015 6:29 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #82

Post by Monta »

[Replying to post 81 by onewithhim]

"...words like "brainwashing"? It is the sentiment behind words like that that is the problem. You say I am "brainwashed" into believing in God because of my upbringing. I don't think that is true. "

I agree with you but this is all they've got.
In my aupbringing I had no concept whatever of anything beyond things you can touch and see. I was in my 40s when i seriously started my search.

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 11114
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1581 times
Been thanked: 471 times

Post #83

Post by onewithhim »

Monta wrote: [Replying to post 81 by onewithhim]

"...words like "brainwashing"? It is the sentiment behind words like that that is the problem. You say I am "brainwashed" into believing in God because of my upbringing. I don't think that is true. "

I agree with you but this is all they've got.
In my aupbringing I had no concept whatever of anything beyond things you can touch and see. I was in my 40s when i seriously started my search.
But "brainwashing"???? I have just shown you that I could not have been "brainwashed" because I reasoned on things, and I did not accept some of the things that you say I was "brainwashed" with.


:-s

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #84

Post by marco »

onewithhim wrote:

I was also taught about hell-fire all of my formative years, but I never accepted it. So....God I accepted, hell-fire I did not. How can you consider me "brainwashed"? Obviously I reasoned on the matter and came to my own conclusions. Using reason is not brainwashing.
It is not "reason" to reject what you don't like. Reason does not support faith, for many use reason to reach a variety of interpretations and conclusions. The most important thing in a faith is to believe unconditionally and find through constant search words that support that personal view. Scripture is most accommodating here since we can claim intimate knowledge of Hebrew to argue grammatical points that seem to lead down the road to Jehovah. Or we can ignore one translation and accept another. What kind of God lives down a road lined with misplaced commas and nuances in meaning between spirit and soul?

O what a work of art is man!

Donray
Guru
Posts: 1195
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:25 pm
Location: CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #85

Post by Donray »

Since I am banned from using brainwashing to describe an idea of someone what other words can I use that have the same meeting.

So, does anyone have another word with the same meaning that I can use?

What a moderator? Do you have list of acceptable words?

User avatar
Talishi
Guru
Posts: 1156
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 11:31 pm
Location: Seattle
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Post #86

Post by Talishi »

Donray wrote: Since I am banned from using brainwashing to describe an idea of someone what other words can I use that have the same meeting. So, does anyone have another word with the same meaning that I can use?
Indoctrinating
Conditioning
Assimilating
Reeducating
Propagandizing
Inculcating
Thank you for playing Debating Christianity & Religion!

User avatar
gordsd
Apprentice
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 2:03 pm
Location: Nevada desert

Re: Heaven & the Resurrection

Post #87

Post by gordsd »

[Replying to post 1 by JehovahsWitness]

Why would it be important to believe rightly about a ressurection? Why would God care? If God is just, God would know that none of us has ever witnessed a resurrection, and God would not condemn a doubter for doubting something highly doubtful! The Bible is full of contradictions; this is just one more on top of the rest. So, how do I reconcile a contradiction? I just accept the fact that it is one and move on, and I simply ask myself, "What is the writer trying to say in this passage, and what is the writer trying to say in that passage?"

User avatar
Blastcat
Banned
Banned
Posts: 5948
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:18 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Heaven & the Resurrection

Post #88

Post by Blastcat »

[Replying to post 1 by JehovahsWitness]
JehovahsWitness wrote: Many believe that the righteous men and women from bible times such as Abraham, died and went to heaven.

If that is the case for you, how do you reconcile this with the idea of a future resurrection on "the last day"? What do you think this refers to.
JOHN 11: 24
Martha answered, "I know he will rise again in the resurrection at the last day."
Ok, first, a disclaimer:

I don't have an opinion about heaven or hell or who goes and who does not.

But as to your perplexing question:
You don't have to get to heaven if you're already there.


:)

Checkpoint
Prodigy
Posts: 4069
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:07 pm
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 64 times

Post #89

Post by Checkpoint »

marco wrote:
Checkpoint wrote:
Talishi wrote:
onewithhim wrote:

Nope.

All of them are still dead, or as scripture sometimes terms it, asleep.
Talishi provided you with an example to suggest that the dead Abraham and Moses don't sleep very well. Your response, nope, doesn't quite make it as an explanation. I have no problem with people thinking the dead are sleeping, but don't imagine that you draw this conclusion from Scripture. When we find a nope in Scripture we can always find a yes.
Many suggestions can be made from scripture, including the one made by Talishi.

I do draw my conclusion from scripture, that the dead are sleeping.

Not from a vision or a parable, but from the plain words of Jesus and of Paul.

User avatar
Blastcat
Banned
Banned
Posts: 5948
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:18 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #90

Post by Blastcat »

[Replying to post 89 by Checkpoint]
Checkpoint wrote:
Many suggestions can be made from scripture, including the one made by Talishi.

I do draw my conclusion from scripture, that the dead are sleeping.

Not from a vision or a parable, but from the plain words of Jesus and of Paul.
As you say, there are many suggestions that can be made from scripture.
Are you suggesting that your conclusion is the best?


:)

Post Reply