onewithhim wrote:
Your objections are implausible. The same could be said of the hangman....like a stone-thrower who isn't interested in making death painless, the hangman might just carelessly knot the noose to ensure a slower death.
Then have the law specify the procedure.
onewithhim wrote:There could be sadists in every execution scenario, I would venture to say.
In order to make a hanging painful, you would need to go out of your way to do so. This is not true for stoning. Chances are, if you stone someone to death, it
will be excruciating. So what makes more sense? To employ an execution method that
might be painful if something goes horribly wrong? Or to employ a method that will most certainly be painful unless the guy is extremely lucky and loses consciousness after the first hit? Statistically speaking, which method would most likely be painless?
onewithhim wrote:Be that as it may, we put a certain amount of trust in the hangman
Yes as he is a professional tasked at performing specified procedure. Biblical law, on the other hand, just has random civilians stone people to death in the streets. Take a guess at which execution will go off more smoothly, cleanly and painlessly?
onewithhim wrote:as we do the person who pulls the switch on the electric chair, so why not give the stone-thrower the benefit of the doubt?
1. There were no appointed stone-throwers.
Deuteronomy 21:21
Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones.
2. Executioners follow precise methods to assure a quick and painless death. There are no such stipulation of clean killing methods in the Bible. Exodus goes in
excruciating detail on how to perform a sacrifice. But when it comes to taking a life? "Oh just throw them with stoned until they're dead". There is
no mention of "please aim for the head".
No mention of "try to make it quick".
You simply cannot compare stoning someone to the electric chair. You cannot compare trained executioners to random Israeli civilians