They decide which texts are literal and which are allegory. They decide what a word really means.
I find it a bit depressing. I could even cope with it if they came to a consensus. I'm thinking of Paul's use of the Hebrew Scriptures. He simply had no respect for context or even the correct rendering?
Apologists will claim he had the authority under Holy Spirit to do so. Are believers claiming the same authority when they bend the texts to fit their beliefs?
Is that what is meant by Spiritual discernment?
I find it particularly disturbing when I'm accused of eisegesis when assuming the literal interpretation of a text. I'm required to defend the plain reading and accused of attempting to force the text into a preconceived interpretation simultaneously?
What's the point of debating with Christians?
Moderator: Moderators
- otseng
- Savant
- Posts: 20838
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Has thanked: 214 times
- Been thanked: 363 times
- Contact:
Post #81
Moderator Intervention
Please cease the tit-for-tats.
Also, most of the discussion seems to have no relevance to the OP.
______________
Moderator interventions do not count as a strike against any posters. They are given at the discretion of a moderator when he or she feels that some sort of intervention is required.
Please cease the tit-for-tats.
Also, most of the discussion seems to have no relevance to the OP.
______________
Moderator interventions do not count as a strike against any posters. They are given at the discretion of a moderator when he or she feels that some sort of intervention is required.
-
- Savant
- Posts: 9874
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
- Location: Planet Earth
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Post #82
You seems to be just explain how other Christians are wrong about personal choice, that doesn't stop whether personal choice plays a part in salvation from being a salvific issue.PinSeeker wrote: No, personal choice is a result of the inward act of salvation -- the inevitable result, but still absolutely necessary -- by God, via His Spirit.
- "So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy." (Romans 9:16)
- PinSeeker
- Banned
- Posts: 2920
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 1:07 pm
- Has thanked: 53 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Post #84
Salvation is of the Lord (Psalm 37:39, Ezekiel 36 and 37, Romans 8:28-29). But that doesn't negate the responsibility of man to choose and respond; rather, God's call necessitates man's choice and response. But God's inward call also guarantees man's free-will, positive choice because of his God-given freedom from bondage to sin and death, and his free-will, positive response inevitably follows. God's purposes cannot be thwarted (Job 42:2). In this way, man's choice is a part of God's great salvation.Bust Nak wrote:You seems to be just explain how other Christians are wrong about personal choice, that doesn't stop whether personal choice plays a part in salvation from being a salvific issue.PinSeeker wrote: No, personal choice is a result of the inward act of salvation -- the inevitable result, but still absolutely necessary -- by God, via His Spirit.
- "So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy." (Romans 9:16)
Peace, Bust Nak.
-
- Savant
- Posts: 9874
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
- Location: Planet Earth
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Post #85
You are still explaining how personal choice do play a part in salvation, that does not address my point: there are Christians who believe personal choice do not play a part in salvation. That is a disagreement over a salvific issue.PinSeeker wrote: Salvation is of the Lord (Psalm 37:39, Ezekiel 36 and 37, Romans 8:28-29). But that doesn't negate the responsibility of man to choose and respond; rather, God's call necessitates man's choice and response. But God's inward call also guarantees man's free-will, positive choice because of his God-given freedom from bondage to sin and death, and his free-will, positive response inevitably follows. God's purposes cannot be thwarted (Job 42:2). In this way, man's choice is a part of God's great salvation.
- PinSeeker
- Banned
- Posts: 2920
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 1:07 pm
- Has thanked: 53 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Post #86
Well, on a human level, maybe. But like I said, salvation is of God and is a work of the Spirit, made possible by the atonement for sin by Christ. And there is no disagreement on that among Christians, which is what I have always said. And that's all that really matters.Bust Nak wrote:You are still explaining how personal choice do play a part in salvation, that does not address my point: there are Christians who believe personal choice do not play a part in salvation. That is a disagreement over a salvific issue.
-
- Savant
- Posts: 9874
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
- Location: Planet Earth
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Post #87
The problem is you said a lot more than that. You also claimed that there were no disagreement over salvific matters, it's clear now that what you really meant was there is no disagreement over this one specific salvific issue.PinSeeker wrote: Well, on a human level, maybe. But like I said, salvation is of God and is a work of the Spirit, made possible by the atonement for sin by Christ. And there is no disagreement on that among Christians, which is what I have always said. And that's all that really matters.
- PinSeeker
- Banned
- Posts: 2920
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 1:07 pm
- Has thanked: 53 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Post #88
No, the problem is you think I said a lot more than that. But we don't have to debate that.Bust Nak wrote:The problem is you said a lot more than that.
There's not. As I said, salvation is of the Lord. There is no disagreement on that. God saves. By the work of His Spirit. Because of the work of atonement on the cross by Jesus. There is no disagreement on that.Bust Nak wrote:You also claimed that there were no disagreement over salvific matters...
No, there's just disagreement over what "salvation is of the Lord" really means -- how far that really reaches. And the reason for that is, some can't get past themselves, which smacks of pride. Which is understandable, because we all battle pride and the many different manifestations of that sin.Bust Nak wrote:it's clear now that what you really meant was there is no disagreement over this one specific salvific issue.
-
- Savant
- Posts: 9874
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
- Location: Planet Earth
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Post #90
But there are a lot more salvific issues other than this one specific issue.PinSeeker wrote: There's not. As I said, salvation is of the Lord. There is no disagreement on that. God saves. By the work of His Spirit. Because of the work of atonement on the cross by Jesus. There is no disagreement on that.
That that right there, is a disagreement over salvific issue. What "salvation is of the Lord" means is a salvific issue.No, there's just disagreement over what "salvation is of the Lord" really means...