Which god is God?

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
SallyF
Guru
Posts: 1459
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:32 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Which god is God?

Post #1

Post by SallyF »

Many, many cultures have imagined God in many, many ways. Certain cultures declare everyone else's idea of God to be false.

How do we objectively determine whose version of God is NOT false?
"God" … just whatever humans imagine it to be.

"Scripture" … just whatever humans write it to be.

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 15251
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 975 times
Been thanked: 1801 times
Contact:

Post #31

Post by William »

[Replying to post 30 by Mithrae]

The illusion of winning is enough for some to give it a go.

;)

User avatar
SallyF
Guru
Posts: 1459
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:32 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #32

Post by SallyF »

SallyF wrote:
How do we objectively determine whose version of God is NOT false?

Once again it is evident that we don't.
Replies here - and everywhere else I've been - indicate that believers have nothing more than human writings and their personal beliefs to offer.

My subjective determination is that ALL versions of "God" are equally false.
"God" … just whatever humans imagine it to be.

"Scripture" … just whatever humans write it to be.

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 15251
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 975 times
Been thanked: 1801 times
Contact:

Post #33

Post by William »

[Replying to post 32 by SallyF]
My subjective determination is that ALL versions of "God" are equally false.
Thanks for letting us all know Sally.

What makes a 'version of GOD' you don't appear to have said.

Personally, my subjective understanding is that the Panentheist idea of GOD is the most likely. Could you explain to the reader why you think that version of GOD is false?

dio9
Under Probation
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2015 7:01 pm

Post #34

Post by dio9 »

FYI God is not a concept concept holders cannot begin to get it. Concepts only separate God is one. AS Buddhist's say ; if you meet Buddha on the road , kill him. , so goes it for concepts of God. Any God we can imagine is not God. God is greater than we are able to imagine. Can a fish imagine the greatness of the ocean? Allegorically We are swimming in God.I dare say all the various versions of God people have are probably false. But make no mistake God exists.

User avatar
Tcg
Savant
Posts: 8667
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
Location: Third Stone
Has thanked: 2257 times
Been thanked: 2369 times

Post #35

Post by Tcg »

dio9 wrote: FYI God is not a concept concept holders cannot begin to get it. Concepts only separate God is one. AS Buddhist's say ; if you meet Buddha on the road , kill him. , so goes it for concepts of God. Any God we can imagine is not God. God is greater than we are able to imagine. Can a fish imagine the greatness of the ocean? Allegorically We are swimming in God.I dare say all the various versions of God people have are probably false. But make no mistake God exists.

Your claim:
  • "God is greater than we are able to imagine."
Reveals that you too are a concept holder in spite of your protest against concept holders.


There is clear evidence that concepts of God exist. When it comes to God itself, all you can offer is an unsupported claim:
  • "But make no mistake God exists."
Your claim supports SallyF's conclusion that:
  • "Replies here - and everywhere else I've been - indicate that believers have nothing more than human writings and their personal beliefs to offer."


Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.

- American Atheists


Not believing isn't the same as believing not.

- wiploc


I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.

- Irvin D. Yalom

User avatar
SallyF
Guru
Posts: 1459
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:32 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #36

Post by SallyF »

[Replying to William]
Personally, my subjective understanding is that the Panentheist idea of GOD is the most likely. Could you explain to the reader why you think that version of GOD is false?

Because it has the identical absence of evidence to every other version of God.
"God" … just whatever humans imagine it to be.

"Scripture" … just whatever humans write it to be.

Zzyzx
Site Supporter
Posts: 25089
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
Location: Bible Belt USA
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 73 times

Post #37

Post by Zzyzx »

.
SallyF wrote: Replies here - and everywhere else I've been - indicate that believers have nothing more than human writings and their personal beliefs to offer.
Exactly -- religions are based on human tales purporting knowledge of supernatural entities and activities -- NOTHING MORE.

Religions, like any deeply held and reinforced beliefs, can produce psychological effects on those who 'drink the cool aid'.

Ancient (or modern) writings are OPINIONS of human writers -- stories they tell. Humans are quite capable of mistakes and deceptions -- creating mythology and legends.

No verification is offered to substantiate claims of knowledge about the proposed 'supernatural'. Saying 'everyone does it' or 'many believe' is NO indication of truth.
.
Non-Theist

ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 15251
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 975 times
Been thanked: 1801 times
Contact:

Post #38

Post by William »

[Replying to post 36 by SallyF]
My subjective determination is that ALL versions of "God" are equally false.
Thanks for letting us all know Sally.

What makes a 'version of GOD' you don't appear to have said.

Personally, my subjective understanding is that the Panentheist idea of GOD is the most likely. Could you explain to the reader why you think that version of GOD is false?
Because it has the identical absence of evidence to every other version of God.
Well that is your claim but I notice with claims like this, that no evidence to back the claim is ever offered.
Perhaps you will be the first to do so?

If you like, we can go head to head on this. At least 3 non-theists members so far have made similar claims about Panentheism but have not been willing to take their opinions into head 2 head with me. Perhaps you will be the first?

User avatar
SallyF
Guru
Posts: 1459
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:32 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #39

Post by SallyF »

William wrote: [Replying to post 36 by SallyF]
My subjective determination is that ALL versions of "God" are equally false.
Thanks for letting us all know Sally.

What makes a 'version of GOD' you don't appear to have said.

Personally, my subjective understanding is that the Panentheist idea of GOD is the most likely. Could you explain to the reader why you think that version of GOD is false?
Because it has the identical absence of evidence to every other version of God.
Well that is your claim but I notice with claims like this, that no evidence to back the claim is ever offered.
Perhaps you will be the first to do so?

If you like, we can go head to head on this. At least 3 non-theists members so far have made similar claims about Panentheism but have not been willing to take their opinions into head 2 head with me. Perhaps you will be the first?
Please examine my absence of evidence in the three lines below:

1)

2)

2)

There you have it.
"God" … just whatever humans imagine it to be.

"Scripture" … just whatever humans write it to be.

User avatar
SallyF
Guru
Posts: 1459
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:32 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #40

Post by SallyF »

How do we objectively determine whose version of God is NOT false?

Ain't nobody demonstrated how we do.


They ALL still look like human-imagined make-believe to this Atheist.
"God" … just whatever humans imagine it to be.

"Scripture" … just whatever humans write it to be.

Post Reply