What does Intelligent Design prove?
I must have asked that question a thousand times in various forms and comment sections and not one single person has ever said, It proves there is a god.
Why is that?
What does Intelligent Design prove?
Moderator: Moderators
Post #124
[Replying to post 122 by JoeyKnothead]
While I am not sure that theStudent will return to this topic, except in secret, what I post here would not be incorrectly considered to be bait. I have engaged theStudent in another of his topics he created this week and I continue to pursue these issues with him.
While I am not sure that theStudent will return to this topic, except in secret, what I post here would not be incorrectly considered to be bait. I have engaged theStudent in another of his topics he created this week and I continue to pursue these issues with him.
*"On the other hand, we have people who are believers who are so completely sold on the literal interpretation of the first book of the Bible that they are rejecting very compelling scientific data about the age of the earth and the relatedness of living beings." Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
*The Atheist has the comfort of no fears for an afterlife and lacks any compulsion to blow himself up.
* Science flies to you the moon.... religion flies you into buildings.
* Faith isn’t a virtue; it is the glorification of voluntary ignorance.
*The Atheist has the comfort of no fears for an afterlife and lacks any compulsion to blow himself up.
* Science flies to you the moon.... religion flies you into buildings.
* Faith isn’t a virtue; it is the glorification of voluntary ignorance.
-
Zzyzx
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 25140
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
- Location: Bible Belt USA
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
Post #125
.
[Replying to post 123 by man]
Moderator Warning
Your post violates at least three Forum Rules -- and contributes nothing to debate.
Please review our Rules.
______________
Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
[Replying to post 123 by man]
Moderator WarningYour post violates at least three Forum Rules -- and contributes nothing to debate.
Please review our Rules.
______________
Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
.
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
-
JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2576 times
-
JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2576 times
Post #127
From Post 124:
But yeah, I've only ever seen 'intelligent design' promoted by the unintelligent (read "ignorant" as a clincal definition).
How might one debate the undebatable?RonE wrote: While I am not sure that theStudent will return to this topic, except in secret, what I post here would not be incorrectly considered to be bait. I have engaged theStudent in another of his topics he created this week and I continue to pursue these issues with him.
But yeah, I've only ever seen 'intelligent design' promoted by the unintelligent (read "ignorant" as a clincal definition).
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
Post #128
It's pretty tough to win a debate with someone who has magical powers on their side.JoeyKnothead wrote: From Post 124:
How might one debate the undebatable?RonE wrote: While I am not sure that theStudent will return to this topic, except in secret, what I post here would not be incorrectly considered to be bait. I have engaged theStudent in another of his topics he created this week and I continue to pursue these issues with him.
But yeah, I've only ever seen 'intelligent design' promoted by the unintelligent (read "ignorant" as a clincal definition).
Post #129
[Replying to post 127 by JoeyKnothead]
Shhh! I said I would show him how to frame his answer into an acceptable scientific format. I've no expectation that the actual evidence he'd present could prove the claims he is making. JBU, my thought is to see if he can accidentally learn something about scientific methods, long odds on him accepting my help.JoeyKnothead wrote: From Post 124:
How might one debate the undebatable?RonE wrote: While I am not sure that theStudent will return to this topic, except in secret, what I post here would not be incorrectly considered to be bait. I have engaged theStudent in another of his topics he created this week and I continue to pursue these issues with him.
But yeah, I've only ever seen 'intelligent design' promoted by the unintelligent (read "ignorant" as a clincal definition).
*"On the other hand, we have people who are believers who are so completely sold on the literal interpretation of the first book of the Bible that they are rejecting very compelling scientific data about the age of the earth and the relatedness of living beings." Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
*The Atheist has the comfort of no fears for an afterlife and lacks any compulsion to blow himself up.
* Science flies to you the moon.... religion flies you into buildings.
* Faith isn’t a virtue; it is the glorification of voluntary ignorance.
*The Atheist has the comfort of no fears for an afterlife and lacks any compulsion to blow himself up.
* Science flies to you the moon.... religion flies you into buildings.
* Faith isn’t a virtue; it is the glorification of voluntary ignorance.
-
JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2576 times
Post #130
Read Zzyzx. He's got supernatural, non-magical powers of intelligence.man wrote:It's pretty tough to win a debate with someone who has magical powers on their side.JoeyKnothead wrote: From Post 124:
How might one debate the undebatable?RonE wrote: While I am not sure that theStudent will return to this topic, except in secret, what I post here would not be incorrectly considered to be bait. I have engaged theStudent in another of his topics he created this week and I continue to pursue these issues with him.
But yeah, I've only ever seen 'intelligent design' promoted by the unintelligent (read "ignorant" as a clincal definition).
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
Post #131
Can you explain what you mean?JoeyKnothead wrote:Read Zzyzx. He's got supernatural, non-magical powers of intelligence.man wrote:It's pretty tough to win a debate with someone who has magical powers on their side.JoeyKnothead wrote: From Post 124:
How might one debate the undebatable?RonE wrote: While I am not sure that theStudent will return to this topic, except in secret, what I post here would not be incorrectly considered to be bait. I have engaged theStudent in another of his topics he created this week and I continue to pursue these issues with him.
But yeah, I've only ever seen 'intelligent design' promoted by the unintelligent (read "ignorant" as a clincal definition).
-
Kenisaw
- Guru
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 2:41 pm
- Location: St Louis, MO, USA
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 61 times
Post #132
Student may have just forgotten about this topic too. I know I get into so many threads sometimes that I forget some of them. Either way, the conversation continues elsewhere at this site. It always does...
