https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OmnipotenceOmnipotence is the quality of having unlimited power.
For debate:
Is the Christian God omnipotent?
What evidence/arguments supports or rejects omnipotence?
Moderator: Moderators
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OmnipotenceOmnipotence is the quality of having unlimited power.
Yes, it would be closer to the ultimate ruler, which is consistent with the agreed upon definition of omnipotence:Diagoras wrote: [Replying to post 36 by otseng]
Thanks for the suggestion. While the first one is reasonably broad, including the ability to create, they both seem to be leaning toward the control/authority aspect. Do you agree?
Therefore, omnipotence in this way of thinking is closer to the ultimate ruler. Do we then accept God as the ultimate authority?
That's not quite what the law of conservation of mass says.Willum wrote: Welp, in high school I learned that matter is neither created nor destroyed.
No creation, no creator required.
No need for omnipotence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_massThe law of conservation of mass or principle of mass conservation states that for any system closed to all transfers of matter and energy, the mass of the system must remain constant over time, as system's mass cannot change, so quantity can neither be added nor be removed.
Moderator CommentSallyF wrote:The Christian versions of God are not omnipotentotseng wrote:
For debate:
Is the Christian God omnipotent?
What evidence/arguments supports or rejects omnipotence?
Because none of the Christian versions of God is God with a capital G.
The claim that any of them is God with a capital G is false.
To even begin to claim omnipotence for a particular version of God, it would have to be demonstrated that that particular version of God existed and that it was indeed God.
To the best of my knowledge, NO version of God has ever ben shown to exist outside the imaginations of believers.
And if all versions of God only exist in human imaginations
No version of God can be omnipotent.
No matter HOW omnipotent is defined.
This is correct if we are simply asking whether the character that features in the Bible has been given omnipotence by his creators. He has. A similar question would be: "Is Macbeth truly wicked?" We read the play and decide.amortalman wrote:
The question is simple. The answer is a simple yes. The Christian God as described in the Christian Bible is omnipotent.
Evidence: The book that introduces and describes him says that he created the heavens and the earth and everything that exists including mankind. It would be hard to imagine anything more powerful than that.
Wouldn't we have to say:otseng wrote:
- no being could exceed the overall power of an omnipotent being
I'd agree with this. A creator has more authority/power/rule over the creation.amortalman wrote: Evidence: The book that introduces and describes him says that he created the heavens and the earth and everything that exists including mankind. It would be hard to imagine anything more powerful than that.
I'd agree with your modification of the definition.Tcg wrote:Wouldn't we have to say:otseng wrote:
- no being could exceed the overall power of an omnipotent being
- no being could exceed or equal the overall power of an omnipotent being
It would be impossible to have two or more equally powerful omnipotent beings. The equal power of the other beings would limit them all to something less than omnipotent.
Is the Christian God omnipotent?otseng wrote: There are various definitions for omnipotence, but we'll start with this one:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OmnipotenceOmnipotence is the quality of having unlimited power.
For debate:
Is the Christian God omnipotent?
What evidence/arguments supports or rejects omnipotence?