As someone who spent a lot of time on the evolution v creationism battles over the last 20 years, I've noticed that in the last 5 years or so the issue seems to have largely gone off the radar. In the message boards that are still around (both Christian and secular) it's barely debated, if at all. Websites specifically dedicated to countering creationist talking points such as talkorigins and pandasthumb have gone silent, seemingly because there just isn't much to talk about.
Surveys have shown that younger Americans accept the reality of evolution at pretty much the same rate as the rest of the developed world. Thanks to national focus on science education by organizations like the NCSE, evolution is more widely taught than ever, even in the deep south. The Discovery Institute (the main "intelligent design" organization) stopped advocating for ID creationism to be taught in schools years ago, and they closed their alleged "research arm" last year.
On the science front, creationism remains as it has for over a century....100% scientifically irrelevant.
So for all practical intents and purposes, this debate is over. There isn't any sort of public debate over teaching creationism, nor is there any real debate about whether evolution should be taught. For sure there's still work to do in some parts of the country (mostly the south and interior west) where even though evolution is officially required, teachers don't teach it either because it's "too controversial" or they don't believe it themselves, but big picture-wise, "evolution v creationism" is in about the same state as "spherical v flat earth"....nothing more than something a handful of people argue about on the internet, but outside of that has little to no significance. And even on that front it's kinda dead....most forums where it's openly debated have a very skewed ratio where there's like 10 "evolutionists" for every 1 creationist.
Glad to see it!
Evolution v Creationism: A Dead Issue
Moderator: Moderators
- Jose Fly
- Guru
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:30 pm
- Location: Out west somewhere
- Has thanked: 352 times
- Been thanked: 1054 times
Evolution v Creationism: A Dead Issue
Post #1Being apathetic is great....or not. I don't really care.
Re: Evolution v Creationism: A Dead Issue
Post #211I'm not responding, I don't even exist, this is all a hallucination yall's experiencing.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:13 pmIf nobody cares, how come you took the time and effort to respond?Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:06 pmNobody cares Joey, nobody cares, save your energy sonny.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:01 pmThat's how come lest I drawed it, I don't claim it was designed.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 6:34 pmCan you look at something and determine if it was designed or not? Nope.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 6:30 pm"We can tell how come it."
"How?"
"Well about that."
One's led to conclude the intelligent design propentist is missing em the one part of it.
I might not can define it.Can you even define intelligence? Nope.
But you can't approach it.
Bull butter.Do you know what a conversation is? Nope.
A conversation's where the pretty thing says we need to talk, but only she gets to do it.
Still ain't found ya no mirror, have ya?Can you disagree with someone without ridiculing what they say? Nope.
I ain't here to comfort your insulterous, inflammatory, put down style of debate.
I'm here to point out how you employ insults and slander when the -ahem- conversation don't go your way, but then you cry like a baby when you get you your fee fees hurt.
And how might we confirm you polled the entire planet of folks, and found not the first one of the many billions of em don't give em a dang?
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6047
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6892 times
- Been thanked: 3244 times
Re: Evolution v Creationism: A Dead Issue
Post #212Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 6:29 pm This just gets better and better. The evolution proponents haven't worked out how to definitively establish if something is designed or not and they also don't even know what intelligence is. It's called comedy gold for a reason.![]()

George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Re: Evolution v Creationism: A Dead Issue
Post #213"I'm not responding." He responded.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:15 pmI'm not responding, I don't even exist, this is all a hallucination yall's experiencing.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:13 pmIf nobody cares, how come you took the time and effort to respond?Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:06 pmNobody cares Joey, nobody cares, save your energy sonny.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:01 pmThat's how come lest I drawed it, I don't claim it was designed.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 6:34 pmCan you look at something and determine if it was designed or not? Nope.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 6:30 pm"We can tell how come it."
"How?"
"Well about that."
One's led to conclude the intelligent design propentist is missing em the one part of it.
I might not can define it.Can you even define intelligence? Nope.
But you can't approach it.
Bull butter.Do you know what a conversation is? Nope.
A conversation's where the pretty thing says we need to talk, but only she gets to do it.
Still ain't found ya no mirror, have ya?Can you disagree with someone without ridiculing what they say? Nope.
I ain't here to comfort your insulterous, inflammatory, put down style of debate.
I'm here to point out how you employ insults and slander when the -ahem- conversation don't go your way, but then you cry like a baby when you get you your fee fees hurt.
And how might we confirm you polled the entire planet of folks, and found not the first one of the many billions of em don't give em a dang?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Re: Evolution v Creationism: A Dead Issue
Post #214He replied, while declaring I'd hafta indicate me some intelligence for him to do it.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:14 pmReally? evolution is a theory invented by human minds.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:10 pmEvolution proponents don't claim design has anything to do with it.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 6:29 pm
This just gets better and better. The evolution proponents haven't worked out how to definitively establish if something is designed or not
and they also don't even know what intelligence is.
Evolution proponents don't claim an intelligent agent's involved in it.
Or what? you'll stamp your feet?JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:10 pm It might be best to just stick to them claims it is you're proud about, and quit trying to stuff em into the mouths of others.
Later dude, as soon as you say something that I can regard as a sign of intelligence I'll reply.
Again with the insults.
If I said you was smart as a clod, would ya take that for praise, or shame?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
Re: Evolution v Creationism: A Dead Issue
Post #215I'd not care, go ahead and call me whatever you like, let her rip!JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:34 pmHe replied, while declaring I'd hafta indicate me some intelligence for him to do it.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:14 pmReally? evolution is a theory invented by human minds.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:10 pmEvolution proponents don't claim design has anything to do with it.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 6:29 pm
This just gets better and better. The evolution proponents haven't worked out how to definitively establish if something is designed or not
and they also don't even know what intelligence is.
Evolution proponents don't claim an intelligent agent's involved in it.
Or what? you'll stamp your feet?JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:10 pm It might be best to just stick to them claims it is you're proud about, and quit trying to stuff em into the mouths of others.
Later dude, as soon as you say something that I can regard as a sign of intelligence I'll reply.
Again with the insults.
If I said you was smart as a clod, would ya take that for praise, or shame?
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Re: Evolution v Creationism: A Dead Issue
Post #216I prefer to call you one who can debate without having to resort to insults.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 11:40 amI'd not care, go ahead and call me whatever you like, let her rip!JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:34 pmHe replied, while declaring I'd hafta indicate me some intelligence for him to do it.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:14 pmReally? evolution is a theory invented by human minds.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:10 pmEvolution proponents don't claim design has anything to do with it.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 6:29 pm
This just gets better and better. The evolution proponents haven't worked out how to definitively establish if something is designed or not
and they also don't even know what intelligence is.
Evolution proponents don't claim an intelligent agent's involved in it.
Or what? you'll stamp your feet?JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:10 pm It might be best to just stick to them claims it is you're proud about, and quit trying to stuff em into the mouths of others.
Later dude, as soon as you say something that I can regard as a sign of intelligence I'll reply.
Again with the insults.
If I said you was smart as a clod, would ya take that for praise, or shame?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
- Jose Fly
- Guru
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:30 pm
- Location: Out west somewhere
- Has thanked: 352 times
- Been thanked: 1054 times
Re: Evolution v Creationism: A Dead Issue
Post #217Creationist: I believe in intelligent design.
What do you mean by "intelligence"?
Creationist: Don't know.
What do you mean by "design"?
Creationist: Don't know.
Um....good talkin' with ya?

Being apathetic is great....or not. I don't really care.
Re: Evolution v Creationism: A Dead Issue
Post #218Evolutionist: I don't believe in intelligent design.
What do you mean by "intelligence"?
Evolutionist: Don't know.
What do you mean by "design"?
Evolutionist: Don't know.
Um....good talkin' with ya?

- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Re: Evolution v Creationism: A Dead Issue
Post #219There ya go... Try to make out like folks're making claims they ain't.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 3:12 pmEvolutionist: I don't believe in intelligent design.
What do you mean by "intelligence"?
Evolutionist: Don't know.
What do you mean by "design"?
Evolutionist: Don't know.
Um....good talkin' with ya?![]()
If you had you an nth of integrity you'd just tell what ya had to tell.
Instead, we get your dooficity.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
Re: Evolution v Creationism: A Dead Issue
Post #220Are you complaining about my analogy or Jose's?JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 3:49 pmThere ya go... Try to make out like folks're making claims they ain't.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 3:12 pmEvolutionist: I don't believe in intelligent design.
What do you mean by "intelligence"?
Evolutionist: Don't know.
What do you mean by "design"?
Evolutionist: Don't know.
Um....good talkin' with ya?![]()
If you had you an nth of integrity you'd just tell what ya had to tell.
Instead, we get your dooficity.