Romans 3:23
For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Luke 1:5-6
5 In the time of Herod king of Judea there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah; his wife Elizabeth was also a descendant of Aaron. 6 Both of them were righteous in the sight of God, observing all the Lord’s commands and decrees blamelessly
Mark 2:17
When Jesus heard it, He said to them, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.”
Everyone isn't a sinner
There are those who are capable of obeying God, that's what scripture says.
So why did Jesus have to die?
(I'm not interested in you posting someone's opinion from a commentary somewhere)
Inerrant......or is it?
Moderator: Moderators
- theophile
- Guru
- Posts: 1664
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 7:09 pm
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 135 times
Re: Inerrant......or is it?
Post #2For starters, I don’t think sin is the same as disobedience to the law. If God wanted perfect obedience to rules or decrees then God should have made us robots, right?
More importantly, I don’t think being righteous in God’s eyes is enough. The book of Job is instructive on this, since in the prologue we see that Job was righteous in God’s eyes but the satan still doubted his motives, i.e., that it was because of what was in it for him. This doubt, I would argue, was because of the general sinfulness of humankind (note on this point where the satan comes from, i.e., from walking all over the earth, where as we know from Genesis 1 humankind rules).
Hence God sanctions Job’s trial, to use Job as a redeeming example for the rest of us. First by taking away all of Job’s family and possessions. Second by taking away his health while explicitly sparing his life. All to show that Job isn’t righteous because of what’s in it for him.
So we could imagine something similar going on here, right? Except now things have gotten even worse on earth under our rule and an even greater trial is called for to redeem us. One that no longer stops short of death.
More importantly, I don’t think being righteous in God’s eyes is enough. The book of Job is instructive on this, since in the prologue we see that Job was righteous in God’s eyes but the satan still doubted his motives, i.e., that it was because of what was in it for him. This doubt, I would argue, was because of the general sinfulness of humankind (note on this point where the satan comes from, i.e., from walking all over the earth, where as we know from Genesis 1 humankind rules).
Hence God sanctions Job’s trial, to use Job as a redeeming example for the rest of us. First by taking away all of Job’s family and possessions. Second by taking away his health while explicitly sparing his life. All to show that Job isn’t righteous because of what’s in it for him.
So we could imagine something similar going on here, right? Except now things have gotten even worse on earth under our rule and an even greater trial is called for to redeem us. One that no longer stops short of death.
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Re: Inerrant......or is it?
Post #3Some stories need the protagonist to suffer them a whole big bunch, to build em up in the eyes of the audience.Ozzy_O wrote: ↑Tue Dec 20, 2022 6:32 am Romans 3:23
For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Luke 1:5-6
5 In the time of Herod king of Judea there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah; his wife Elizabeth was also a descendant of Aaron. 6 Both of them were righteous in the sight of God, observing all the Lord’s commands and decrees blamelessly
Mark 2:17
When Jesus heard it, He said to them, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.”
Everyone isn't a sinner
There are those who are capable of obeying God, that's what scripture says.
So why did Jesus have to die?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2020 12:18 pm
- Has thanked: 48 times
- Been thanked: 251 times
Re: Inerrant......or is it?
Post #4I think that most people are capable of understanding hyperbole and symbolic language. Zechariah and Elizabeth were not literally perfect; they were good people by human standards. The “righteous” whom Jesus did not call were not sinless; they were people who believed themselves good enough that they did not need to repent or who thought they could achieve that level of goodness on their own.Ozzy_O wrote: ↑Tue Dec 20, 2022 6:32 am Romans 3:23
For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Luke 1:5-6
5 In the time of Herod king of Judea there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah; his wife Elizabeth was also a descendant of Aaron. 6 Both of them were righteous in the sight of God, observing all the Lord’s commands and decrees blamelessly
Mark 2:17
When Jesus heard it, He said to them, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.”
Everyone isn't a sinner
There are those who are capable of obeying God, that's what scripture says.
So why did Jesus have to die?
(I'm not interested in you posting someone's opinion from a commentary somewhere)
As people we don’t communicate in absolutely literal terms. We don’t read other documents that way. We don’t speak or write that way ourselves. That’s just not how human communication works.
If our goal is anything more than finding problems in the Bible that justify our pre-existing beliefs, we will have to read the Bible in a more natural way with a reasonable acceptance of symbolic language.
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.
-Charles Darwin
-Charles Darwin
- Miles
- Savant
- Posts: 5179
- Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 4:19 pm
- Has thanked: 434 times
- Been thanked: 1614 times
- Purple Knight
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3935
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 6:00 pm
- Has thanked: 1250 times
- Been thanked: 802 times
Re: Inerrant......or is it?
Post #6He didn't.Ozzy_O wrote: ↑Tue Dec 20, 2022 6:32 am Romans 3:23
For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Luke 1:5-6
5 In the time of Herod king of Judea there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah; his wife Elizabeth was also a descendant of Aaron. 6 Both of them were righteous in the sight of God, observing all the Lord’s commands and decrees blamelessly
Mark 2:17
When Jesus heard it, He said to them, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.”
Everyone isn't a sinner
There are those who are capable of obeying God, that's what scripture says.
So why did Jesus have to die?
Presumably even if 100% of the people aren't sinners, there's still value in saving the 99% who are.
Take it with a grain of salt because I'm an atheist (though one willing to fully engage with the lore for the purposes of the question), but to me it reads like he never had to. He wanted to. Or at least, he chose to. I think that's what the whole trials in the desert thing was about. He always could have chosen not to do this.
And now I'm going to get extracanonical and theoretical.
What if "dying for your sins" wasn't exactly the issue here? What if the issue was, we as humans have these bodies that want to sin so badly that 99% of us are sinners, and so God was looking to find out what he would do in our place. So he duplicates his personality but not his memories and sticks it in a human body. This is basically a what-if, as in, what if free will actually means God doesn't know at least one factor in this equation?
So in comes Jesus, the incarnation, with these expectations on him of something really horrid to do, that he is expected to do, which is die for everyone else when they are worse sinners. This is what we as humans are expected to do if someone wants to strike us: Let them strike us again. So Jesus has to endure this himself, perhaps the most extreme version possible which is let humans kill him. If he chose not to maybe God would have had to rework the universe and make the bar lower.
- 1213
- Savant
- Posts: 12737
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 443 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: Inerrant......or is it?
Post #7Apparently because people are evil blood thirsty murderers who want everyone good to die.
The reason why it was allowed to happen is according to the Bible this:
For to this end Christ died, rose, and lived again, that he might be Lord of both the dead and the living.
Romans 14:9
Also this can be seen as one reason why it was allowed to happen:
Most assuredly I tell you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains by itself alone. But if it dies, it bears much fruit.
Joh. 12:24
By dying Jesus could be raised from death and by doing so he gave the courage for his disciples to continue fearlesly.
My new book can be read freely from here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view
Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view
Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6047
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6892 times
- Been thanked: 3244 times
Re: Inerrant......or is it?
Post #8This is patently ridiculous to me. Please show that you speak the truth.
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 9237
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:05 am
- Has thanked: 1080 times
- Been thanked: 3981 times
Re: Inerrant......or is it?
Post #9But Jesus was Son of God; they weren't. He was going to be raised because he was God (unless you don't believe that,of course). Because Jesus was raised is no guarantee they would be.1213 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 21, 2022 5:35 amApparently because people are evil blood thirsty murderers who want everyone good to die.
The reason why it was allowed to happen is according to the Bible this:
For to this end Christ died, rose, and lived again, that he might be Lord of both the dead and the living.
Romans 14:9
Also this can be seen as one reason why it was allowed to happen:
Most assuredly I tell you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains by itself alone. But if it dies, it bears much fruit.
Joh. 12:24
By dying Jesus could be raised from death and by doing so he gave the courage for his disciples to continue fearlesly.
Gandalf: "End? No, the journey doesn't end here. Death is just another path. One that we all must take. The grey rain-curtain of this world rolls back, and all turns to silver glass... then you see it!"
Pippin:." What? Gandalf? Sees what? "
Gandalf: "White shores... and beyond. A far green country, under a swift sunrise."
Pippin: "Well, that disnae sound so bad."
Gandalf. "No. No, it isn't."
The bit they left out
"Now, off you go and fight to the last man and the last bullet."
Faramir: "I notice that you didn't tell him that the afterlife is just for Elves and Wizards; not me, Dwarves or Halflings."
Gandalf :"He will fight better if he believes it is."
Faramir: "Comfortable lies, Gandalf?"
Gandalf: "Comfortable lies, Faramir."
- 1213
- Savant
- Posts: 12737
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 443 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: Inerrant......or is it?
Post #10Bible doesn't say he Jesus was raised because he was God. According to the Bible, there is only one true God. And it was God who raised Jesus from death (Heb. 13:20). But, I agree with that it is not a guarantee that everyone else is raised. However, it is the reason why disciples of Jesus became fearless.TRANSPONDER wrote: ↑Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:10 am But Jesus was Son of God; they weren't. He was going to be raised because he was God (unless you don't believe that,of course). Because Jesus was raised is no guarantee they would be.
My new book can be read freely from here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view
Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view
Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html