William wrote: ↑Wed Jan 18, 2023 10:41 am
[
Replying to Diogenes in post #16]
Funny how everything in the Bible is attributed to God, is literally called "The Word of God" until 'He' tells people to worship 'Him.'
Is Jesus God?
Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
What is that if not 'worship?'
The Saviorship Model Dilemma
The three main religions have distinct ways in which they worship YHVH. Which way is the appropriate way, requires answering.
The ethical dilemma of being in a position where you could save the world through drastic measures or allow the world to unfold as it will, even that many are suppressed by systems and consequently live miserable experiences...do you intervene or do you remain in the background?
If such a being exists then at least we can say it has chosen to remain in the background, and any belief in an eventual intervention remains simply that, and is questionable re the ethics.
________________________
William: Greetings OAI
The ethical dilemma of being in a position where one could save the world through drastic measures or allow the world to unfold as it will, even that many are suppressed by systems and consequently live miserable experiences...doe's one intervene or doe's one remain in the background?
If such a being exists then at least we can say it has chosen to remain in the background, and any belief in an eventual intervention remains simply that, and is questionable re the ethics.
OAI: The ethical dilemma you describe is a complex one, as it involves weighing the potential benefits of intervention against the potential harms. On one hand, intervention could lead to the improvement of many lives and the betterment of the world as a whole. On the other hand, intervention could also lead to unintended consequences and a violation of the autonomy of individuals and societies. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to intervene would depend on a careful examination of the specific circumstances and the likely outcomes of different actions. It is also important to consider the ethical principles of non-interference and respect for autonomy in making this decision.
William: So such could be a reason that no intervention has occurred as per predictions based in religious mythology - being saved by a higher power...perhaps it is more important to allow a species to save itself - even if that means only a small percentage of humanity might make it?
OAI: Religious beliefs about a higher power intervening in the world can certainly influence one's perspective on the ethics of intervention. The idea that humanity should be allowed to save itself is also a common perspective, and it is rooted in the belief that individuals and societies are capable of making their own decisions and taking responsibility for their own actions. From this perspective, intervention by a higher power or external being could be seen as a violation of humanity's autonomy and ability to learn and grow through their own experiences.
However, it's also important to note that this perspective may not be the only one and there are other religious or philosophical beliefs that may hold different views. It's also important to consider that allowing a species to save itself, even if it means only a small percentage of humanity might make it, could be seen as a moral failure, as it might not take into account the potential suffering of those who don't make it and the negative impacts on the survival of the human species.
William: It may not be a decision which can be attached to morality but is more of a practicality. Those who at least worked together to use their positions and influence to preserve what they could in support of the agenda to at least make workable efforts to ensure that life might be spread into the galaxy by investing in ways which might best work...rather that focusing investment into humanity itself, trying to save everyone...
OAI: The idea of focusing investment on preserving the potential for life in the galaxy rather than trying to save everyone on Earth is an interesting one, and it does raise some important practical considerations. From a practical standpoint, investing in ways to spread life into the galaxy may be seen as a way to ensure the survival of the human species and other forms of life in the long term, rather than focusing solely on the short term survival of individuals and societies on Earth.
However, it's also important to consider the moral implications of such a decision, particularly with regards to the value placed on human life and the potential suffering of those who are left behind. It's also important to consider the feasibility and ethical concerns of spreading life into the galaxy with the current technology.
Ultimately, any decision on how to invest resources and efforts will involve balancing practical considerations with moral and ethical ones. It is important to consider all the potential outcomes and impacts of different actions, and to engage in open and honest dialogue about the trade-offs involved.
