How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen❓

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
The Nice Centurion
Guru
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:47 pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 107 times

How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen❓

Post #1

Post by The Nice Centurion »

If a world religion claimed that 2000 years ago someone built a time machine, then people would fall over their own feet to constantly ask: "How excactly did this time machine work?"

But now we have in the bible a a main protagonist resurrect from being dead and no one, neither Christian nor Sceptic ever, bothers to ask:
"How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen?"

Marvel fans are known to intensively debate questions like:
"How exactly does Spidermans power of sticking to walls and ceilings work?"

But no one on earth gives a damn about how exactly worked "The Resurrection"!


My first question for debate: Why is that so❓


Now lets first see what "resurrection" is supposed to mean.

First: A resurrected being in the bible is not undead like Count Dracula as a Vampyre, who has no biological bodily functions anymore and is kept undead alive by magic alone.

A truly resurrected being is supposed to have regained live and full biological bodily functions out of the state of being truly dead.
And he is therefore not being kept alive by magic alone, though magic m i g h t have triggered his resurrection.

Everyone agrees that Jesus is supposed to have been "really dead" ! By current medical definition that does mean already brain dead.

This is the state anyone must reach to honestly resurrect.
For we have semi dead people waking up from clinical death all the time and no one is claiming miracle of resurrection for them.

But lets see what naturally happens after brain death:
"Decomposition (of the brain) often occurs within minutes after death, which is quicker than other body tissues, likely because the brain is about 80% water. Rotting starts in normal ambient temperature at about 3 days, and the brain is essentially vaporized within 5-10 years."

Said all that we can begin trying to find out how Jesus resurrection might have happened in detail.

Bible gives a hint by intensively implicating that Jesus resurrection was triggered by magic.

Bible explains that Jesus died sometime P.M. during first day, was dead the whole second day and resurrected on third day before daybreak.
(Lets say he was dead for somewhat 36 hours.)

Now, said all that; What is possible?

Magic, as the Great Joe Quesada stated when he destroyed the Spiderman comic series for the fans, must not be explained.

But what that magic did do can be researched.

Did magic stop Jesus brain and therefore his body too from decomposing, kept it in a somewhat timeless state and make him arise 36 hours later?

Did Jesus naturally decompose and magic made him re-decompose later to let him be able to better resurrect?

And then we have still the problem that Jesus died supposedly on the cross because fatal hurts and woundings to his body caused his heart to stop.

How therefore did his body compensate this fatal wounds, to still be able to resurrect?

I will stop here explaining, starting the debate with the second and main question:


How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen❓
“If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. But if you drown a man in a fish pond, he will never have to go hungry again🐟

"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon❗"

"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates❗"

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 12743
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 444 times
Been thanked: 468 times

Re: How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen❓

Post #101

Post by 1213 »

TRANSPONDER wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:52 am You posted everything but left out bits you didn't like.
What bit? I think there were all parts from the Gospels.
TRANSPONDER wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:52 amAnd you have done so here. You quoted from John 20. 1 Early on the first day of the week, while it was still dark, Mary Magdalene went to the tomb and saw that the stone had been removed from the entrance. 2 So she came running to Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one Jesus loved, and said, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we don’t know where they have put him!”

"We" don't know where they have put him. That says there were more than Mary Magdalene.
No, it tells only that there were more than one person who didn’t know.
TRANSPONDER wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:52 am Mary Magdalene must have seen the angel if it had been there and must have run into Jesus as per Matthew
Sorry, I don’t see any good reason to think so.
TRANSPONDER wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:52 am I'll just ask what argument you can make to show that the women split up and Mary Magadalene did not hear what the angel said, let alone run into Jesus…
Argument 1: That is what it looks like, when the Gospels are connected without contradictions. And if there is no good reason to connect them in a contradicting way, then I think the non-contradictory way is the best and most logical choice.
Argument 2: John tells Mary went to talk about the empty tomb to others. If she would have heard and seen the angel or Jesus before that, or that there would have been someone else with her going to tell the message, the story would be different.
My new book can be read freely from here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view

Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html

TRANSPONDER
Banned
Banned
Posts: 9237
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:05 am
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 3981 times

Re: How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen❓

Post #102

Post by TRANSPONDER »

1213 wrote: Sun Feb 11, 2024 4:48 am
TRANSPONDER wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:52 am You posted everything but left out bits you didn't like.
What bit? I think there were all parts from the Gospels.
TRANSPONDER wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:52 amAnd you have done so here. You quoted from John 20. 1 Early on the first day of the week, while it was still dark, Mary Magdalene went to the tomb and saw that the stone had been removed from the entrance. 2 So she came running to Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one Jesus loved, and said, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we don’t know where they have put him!”

"We" don't know where they have put him. That says there were more than Mary Magdalene.
No, it tells only that there were more than one person who didn’t know.
TRANSPONDER wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:52 am Mary Magdalene must have seen the angel if it had been there and must have run into Jesus as per Matthew
Sorry, I don’t see any good reason to think so.
TRANSPONDER wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:52 am I'll just ask what argument you can make to show that the women split up and Mary Magadalene did not hear what the angel said, let alone run into Jesus…
Argument 1: That is what it looks like, when the Gospels are connected without contradictions. And if there is no good reason to connect them in a contradicting way, then I think the non-contradictory way is the best and most logical choice.
Argument 2: John tells Mary went to talk about the empty tomb to others. If she would have heard and seen the angel or Jesus before that, or that there would have been someone else with her going to tell the message, the story would be different.
What bits did you leave out? I recall that I already told you. Look: You posted

7 And going quickly say to His disciples that He was raised from the dead. And behold! He goes before you into Galilee. You will see Him there. Behold! I told you.
Mark. 16:7 But go, say to the disciples and to Peter, He goes before you into Galilee. You will see Him there, even as He told you.
Matt.28:8 And going away from the tomb quickly, with fear and great joy, they ran to report to His disciples.
Mark. 16:8 And going out quickly, they fled from the tomb. And trembling and ecstasy took hold of them. And they told no one, not a thing, for they were afraid.
Note!, some think that this means they never told about the matter to anyone ever. If that would be the case, we would not have this story. That is why it is reasonable to think they only didn’t tell on their way about it.
John:20:3 Then Peter and the other disciple went out and came to the tomb.
John:20:4 And the two ran together, and the other disciple ran in front more quickly than Peter and came first to the tomb.
John:20:5 And stooping down, he saw the linens lying; however, he did not go in.
John:20:6 Then Simon Peter came following him, and went into the tomb and saw the linens lying.


You leave out Matthew saying that Mary and the others ran into Jesus. You leave out Luke mention that it was Mary Magdalene and the others that related all these things, and you leave out John having Mary tell the disciples that Jesus is gone and she doesn't know where.

I hardly need point out to readers that you are leaving out the bits you don't like, because they are serious contradictions. You have just cherry picked the bits that work well enough together. I will refrain from pointing the finger but you argue that 'We' (in John) says there was more than one woman, Mary Magdalene and the other (presumably Jesus' mother) and according to Luke, there were others. That makes no difference to the point that Luke has Mary Magdalene hearing the angel's explanation that Jesus had risen and Matthew even having the women running into Jesus, but (apart from Luke pretty much denying that bit in what Cleophas says on the road to Emmaus) it totally is contradicted by John who has Mary Magdalene revealing that they (the women) do not know what has happened to Jesus.

Aside from all the less than credible or creditable apologetics you did above, I agree (indeed I recall I made the point myself that the women were all there and had not split up) that 'We' means at least one other woman was with Mary Magdalene. I know that you are flailing and wriggling to escape this evidential net, but nit picks like that make your case (the women split up) worse, not better.

Hang On I'll have to submit so i can see what is new points O:)
Last edited by TRANSPONDER on Sun Feb 11, 2024 8:24 am, edited 3 times in total.

TRANSPONDER
Banned
Banned
Posts: 9237
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:05 am
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 3981 times

Re: How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen❓

Post #103

Post by TRANSPONDER »

TRANSPONDER wrote: Sun Feb 11, 2024 8:07 am
1213 wrote: Sun Feb 11, 2024 4:48 am
TRANSPONDER wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:52 am You posted everything but left out bits you didn't like.
What bit? I think there were all parts from the Gospels.
TRANSPONDER wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:52 amAnd you have done so here. You quoted from John 20. 1 Early on the first day of the week, while it was still dark, Mary Magdalene went to the tomb and saw that the stone had been removed from the entrance. 2 So she came running to Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one Jesus loved, and said, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we don’t know where they have put him!”

"We" don't know where they have put him. That says there were more than Mary Magdalene.
No, it tells only that there were more than one person who didn’t know.
TRANSPONDER wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:52 am Mary Magdalene must have seen the angel if it had been there and must have run into Jesus as per Matthew
Sorry, I don’t see any good reason to think so.
TRANSPONDER wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:52 am I'll just ask what argument you can make to show that the women split up and Mary Magadalene did not hear what the angel said, let alone run into Jesus…
Argument 1: That is what it looks like, when the Gospels are connected without contradictions. And if there is no good reason to connect them in a contradicting way, then I think the non-contradictory way is the best and most logical choice.
Argument 2: John tells Mary went to talk about the empty tomb to others. If she would have heard and seen the angel or Jesus before that, or that there would have been someone else with her going to tell the message, the story would be different.
What bits did you leave out? I rwecal that I already told you. Look: You posted

7 And going quickly say to His disciples that He was raised from the dead. And behold! He goes before you into Galilee. You will see Him there. Behold! I told you.
Mark. 16:7 But go, say to the disciples and to Peter, He goes before you into Galilee. You will see Him there, even as He told you.
Matt.28:8 And going away from the tomb quickly, with fear and great joy, they ran to report to His disciples.
Mark. 16:8 And going out quickly, they fled from the tomb. And trembling and ecstasy took hold of them. And they told no one, not a thing, for they were afraid.
Note!, some think that this means they never told about the matter to anyone ever. If that would be the case, we would not have this story. That is why it is reasonable to think they only didn’t tell on their way about it.
John:20:3 Then Peter and the other disciple went out and came to the tomb.
John:20:4 And the two ran together, and the other disciple ran in front more quickly than Peter and came first to the tomb.
John:20:5 And stooping down, he saw the linens lying; however, he did not go in.
John:20:6 Then Simon Peter came following him, and went into the tomb and saw the linens lying.


You leave out Matthew saying that Mary and the others ran into Jesus. You leave out Luke mention that it was Mary Magdalene and the others that related all these things, and you leave out John having Mary tell the disciples that Jesus is gone and she doesn't know where.

I hardly need point out to readers that you are leaving out the bits you don'tlike, because they are serious contradictions. You have just cherry picked the bits that work well enough together. I will refrain from pointing the finger but you argue that 'We' (in John) says there was more than one woman, Mary Magdalene and the other (presumably Jesus' mother) and according to Luke, there were others. That makes no difference to the point that Luke has Mary Magdalene hearing the angel's explanation that Jesus had risen and Matthew even having the women running into Jesus, but (apart from Luke pretty much denying that bit in what Cleophas says on the road to Emmaus) it totally is contradicted by John who has Mary Magdalene revealing that they (the women) do not know what has happened to Jesus.

Aside from all the less than credible or creditable apologetics you did above, I agree (indeed I recall I made the point myself that the women were all there and had not split up) that 'We means at least one other woman was with Mary Magdalene. I know that you are flailing and wriggling to escape this net, but nit picks like that make your case (the women split up) worse, not better.

Hang On I'll have to submit so i can see what is new points O:)
You don't see any reason to think so? Oh yes you do. We can see it because you left these points out. Why would you do that if you weren't trying to conceal that they contradict your excuses? It is good old denial even of definite proof
I might be forgiven for feeling aggrieved that not only do you pull such bad apologetics, but appear to think that you can fool me, but in fact I should thank you for being such a good Bad Example of how Bible aplogists fiddle and conceal in order to fool people into thinking that Bible is credible.

Dude, :D you give yourself away here

Argument 1: That is what it looks like, when the Gospels are connected without contradictions. And if there is no good reason to connect them in a contradicting way, then I think the non-contradictory way is the best and most logical choice.
Argument 2: John tells Mary went to talk about the empty tomb to others. If she would have heard and seen the angel or Jesus before that, or that there would have been someone else with her going to tell the message, the story would be different.


Yes, that is what it looks like when you leave the bits out that contradict - yes, then you can make a more or less credible narrative. But you can only do this by fiddling and cherry picking the evidence.
Argument 2 merely seems to accept that if she had heard and seen the angel m (as the synoptics say) her story would be different - she'd be telling there was an angel who said that Jesus had risen, quite apart from she (and the other or others) had actually run into Jesus, as Matthew relates. Don't you see that you are actually agreeing with me but saying it as though you refute me.

My good dude... I don't know what to say about a mindset so mixed up by faithbased denial even of what the Bible sets out that you can't think straight. I will only say to the Bible apologists posting and looking in, "Shouldn't you - wall be wondering: 'Is that what I sound like?"

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 12743
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 444 times
Been thanked: 468 times

Re: How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen❓

Post #104

Post by 1213 »

TRANSPONDER wrote: Sun Feb 11, 2024 8:07 am ...You leave out Matthew saying that Mary and the others ran into Jesus. You leave out Luke mention that it was Mary Magdalene and the others that related all these things, and you leave out John having Mary tell the disciples that Jesus is gone and she doesn't know where.....
I had the whole Matthew in my post, as anyone can read, so it is extremely ridiculous to claim otherwise.
My new book can be read freely from here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view

Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html

TRANSPONDER
Banned
Banned
Posts: 9237
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:05 am
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 3981 times

Re: How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen❓

Post #105

Post by TRANSPONDER »

1213 wrote: Mon Feb 12, 2024 2:15 pm
TRANSPONDER wrote: Sun Feb 11, 2024 8:07 am ...You leave out Matthew saying that Mary and the others ran into Jesus. You leave out Luke mention that it was Mary Magdalene and the others that related all these things, and you leave out John having Mary tell the disciples that Jesus is gone and she doesn't know where.....
I had the whole Matthew in my post, as anyone can read, so it is extremely ridiculous to claim otherwise.

You left out the bit about the Marys running into Jesus .As anyone can read. You also left out Mary saying that they did not know what had happened to Jesus.You left out any contradictions.


Matthew 28. 8 So the women hurried away from the tomb, afraid yet filled with joy, and ran to tell his disciples. 9 Suddenly Jesus met them. “Greetings,” he said. They came to him, clasped his feet and worshiped him. 10 Then Jesus said to them, “Do not be afraid. Go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.”

Is that in what you posted? I can't find it.

User avatar
The Nice Centurion
Guru
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:47 pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 107 times

Re: How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen❓

Post #106

Post by The Nice Centurion »

TRANSPONDER wrote: Mon Feb 12, 2024 10:07 pm
1213 wrote: Mon Feb 12, 2024 2:15 pm
TRANSPONDER wrote: Sun Feb 11, 2024 8:07 am ...You leave out Matthew saying that Mary and the others ran into Jesus. You leave out Luke mention that it was Mary Magdalene and the others that related all these things, and you leave out John having Mary tell the disciples that Jesus is gone and she doesn't know where.....
I had the whole Matthew in my post, as anyone can read, so it is extremely ridiculous to claim otherwise.

You left out the bit about the Marys running into Jesus .As anyone can read. You also left out Mary saying that they did not know what had happened to Jesus.You left out any contradictions.


Matthew 28. 8 So the women hurried away from the tomb, afraid yet filled with joy, and ran to tell his disciples. 9 Suddenly Jesus met them. “Greetings,” he said. They came to him, clasped his feet and worshiped him. 10 Then Jesus said to them, “Do not be afraid. Go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.”

Is that in what you posted? I can't find it.
See my resurrected thread about Simon Greenleaf;
viewtopic.php?t=7730

There his work about the truth of the gospels gets critiqued, because him ignoring the fact of them being strongly adulterated/redacted from the start (especially gospel of John) so that we have a hard time speculating what the first scribe might have written.
Main reason for doing that to scripture was of course always to make it fit the most opportune theological view.

Scripture as we know it today is heavily adulterated.
In that Mohammed and Joseph Smith were right.


And here in this thread above we look at a most modern example of tampering with scriptural text to make it fit ones theology. Well done.
“If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. But if you drown a man in a fish pond, he will never have to go hungry again🐟

"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon❗"

"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates❗"

TRANSPONDER
Banned
Banned
Posts: 9237
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:05 am
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 3981 times

Re: How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen❓

Post #107

Post by TRANSPONDER »

The Nice Centurion wrote: Mon Feb 12, 2024 10:56 pm
TRANSPONDER wrote: Mon Feb 12, 2024 10:07 pm
1213 wrote: Mon Feb 12, 2024 2:15 pm
TRANSPONDER wrote: Sun Feb 11, 2024 8:07 am ...You leave out Matthew saying that Mary and the others ran into Jesus. You leave out Luke mention that it was Mary Magdalene and the others that related all these things, and you leave out John having Mary tell the disciples that Jesus is gone and she doesn't know where.....
I had the whole Matthew in my post, as anyone can read, so it is extremely ridiculous to claim otherwise.

You left out the bit about the Marys running into Jesus .As anyone can read. You also left out Mary saying that they did not know what had happened to Jesus.You left out any contradictions.


Matthew 28. 8 So the women hurried away from the tomb, afraid yet filled with joy, and ran to tell his disciples. 9 Suddenly Jesus met them. “Greetings,” he said. They came to him, clasped his feet and worshiped him. 10 Then Jesus said to them, “Do not be afraid. Go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.”

Is that in what you posted? I can't find it.
See my resurrected thread about Simon Greenleaf;
viewtopic.php?t=7730

There his work about the truth of the gospels gets critiqued, because him ignoring the fact of them being strongly adulterated/redacted from the start (especially gospel of John) so that we have a hard time speculating what the first scribe might have written.
Main reason for doing that to scripture was of course always to make it fit the most opportune theological view.

Scripture as we know it today is heavily adulterated.
In that Mohammed and Joseph Smith were right.


And here in this thread above we look at a most modern example of tampering with scriptural text to make it fit ones theology. Well done.
That's a valid point. We see blatant fiddling and rewrites of the Bible we can look at as though the 'Ghost Bible' in the head (saying what they want, not what it says) can be put down on paper and they wonder why there are contradictions.

If I am right (and I don't see how I'm not - and several passages have been left out) then our pal 1213 has not only just ignored anything that doesn't fit but he has had to pick and choose the text and knowlngly omit anything that contradicts.

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 12743
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 444 times
Been thanked: 468 times

Re: How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen❓

Post #108

Post by 1213 »

TRANSPONDER wrote: Mon Feb 12, 2024 10:07 pm You left out the bit about the Marys running into Jesus ...
Matthew 28. 8 So the women hurried away from the tomb, afraid yet filled with joy, and ran to tell his disciples. 9 Suddenly Jesus met them. “Greetings,” he said. They came to him, clasped his feet and worshiped him. 10 Then Jesus said to them, “Do not be afraid. Go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.”
...
I had also Matt 28:8. And it is interesting why do you claim Marys run into Jesus, when it says "the women hurried away". It is possible that the other Marry went different path, as John suggests.
My new book can be read freely from here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view

Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html

TRANSPONDER
Banned
Banned
Posts: 9237
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:05 am
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 3981 times

Re: How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen❓

Post #109

Post by TRANSPONDER »

1213 wrote: Tue Feb 13, 2024 2:16 pm
TRANSPONDER wrote: Mon Feb 12, 2024 10:07 pm You left out the bit about the Marys running into Jesus ...
Matthew 28. 8 So the women hurried away from the tomb, afraid yet filled with joy, and ran to tell his disciples. 9 Suddenly Jesus met them. “Greetings,” he said. They came to him, clasped his feet and worshiped him. 10 Then Jesus said to them, “Do not be afraid. Go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.”
...
I had also Matt 28:8. And it is interesting why do you claim Marys run into Jesus, when it says "the women hurried away". It is possible that the other Marry went different path, as John suggests.
You did not have it, but let's say it was there. It contradicts John who says that Mary (and the one with her) "We" do not know where they have laid him. You know this, clearly as you try to explain this with the women splitting up. This is 'making stuff up' as the Bible says no such thing, and Luke (24.10) who heard the angelic explanation and she and the others explained all this to the apostles - it says, which you also left out.

You may go round in denialist (and self contradictory) circles as much as you like, the more you evade and deny, the worse your case looks and the more I invite other Bible apologists to wonder "Is that what I sound like?"


Here is the relevant bit of what you posted:
Matt.28:1 But after the sabbaths, at the dawning of the first of the sabbaths, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to see the grave.
(Mark. 16:3 And they said to themselves, Who will roll away the stone from the door of the tomb for us?)
(Luke 24:1 But on the first of the sabbaths, while still very early, they came on the tomb, carrying spices which they prepared; and some were with them.)
Matt.28:2 And, behold! A great earthquake occurred! For descending from Heaven and coming near, an angel of the Lord rolled away the stone from the door and was sitting on it.
Matt.28:3 And his face was as lightning and his clothing white as snow.
Matt.28:4 And those keeping guard were shaken from the fear of him, and they became as dead.
Note! Apparently, the earthquake and rolling of the stone was seen only by the guards, not the women that vent to the tomb.
Mark. 16:4 And looking up, they saw that the stone had been rolled back; for it was very large.
Luke 24:2 And they found the stone having been rolled away from the tomb.
John:20:1 But on the first of the week, Mary Magdalene came early to the tomb, darkness yet being on it . And she saw the stone had been removed from the tomb.
John:20:2 Then she ran and came to Simon Peter, and to the other disciple whom Jesus loved, and said to them, They took away the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not know where they laid Him.
Note! Apparently, Mary left the tomb, while other women stayed at the tomb.
Luke 24:3 And going in, they did not find the body of the Lord Jesus.
Mark. 16:5 And entering into the tomb, they saw a young man sitting on the right, having been clothed in a white robe. And they were much amazed.
Luke 24:4 And it happened, as they were perplexed about this, even behold, two men in shining clothing stood by them.
Luke 24:5 And they becoming terrified, and bowing their faces to the earth, they said to them, Why do you seek the living with the dead?
Matt.28:5 But answering, the angel said to the women, You must not fear, for I know that you seek Jesus who has been crucified.
Matt.28:6 He is not here, for He was raised, as He said. Come, see the place where the Lord was lying.
(Mark. 16:6 But He said to them, Do not be amazed. You seek Jesus the Nazarene who has been crucified. He was raised. He is not here. See the place where they put Him?)
(Luke 24:6 He is not here, but was raised. Remember how He spoke to you, yet being in Galilee,)
Luke 24:7 saying, The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and to be crucified, and the third day to rise again.
Luke 24:8 And they remembered His words.
7 And going quickly say to His disciples that He was raised from the dead. And behold! He goes before you into Galilee. You will see Him there. Behold! I told you.
Mark. 16:7 But go, say to the disciples and to Peter, He goes before you into Galilee. You will see Him there, even as He told you.
Matt.28:8 And going away from the tomb quickly, with fear and great joy, they ran to report to His disciples.
Mark. 16:8 And going out quickly, they fled from the tomb. And trembling and ecstasy took hold of them. And they told no one, not a thing, for they were afraid.
Note!, some think that this means they never told about the matter to anyone ever. If that would be the case, we would not have this story. That is why it is reasonable to think they only didn’t tell on their way about it.
John:20:3 Then Peter and the other disciple went out and came to the tomb.
John:20:4 And the two ran together, and the other disciple ran in front more quickly than Peter and came first to the tomb.
John:20:5 And stooping down, he saw the linens lying; however, he did not go in.
John:20:6 Then Simon Peter came following him, and went into the tomb and saw the linens lying.
John:20:7 And the grave cloth which was on His head was not lying with the linens, but was wrapped up in one place by itself.
John:20:8 Therefore, then the other disciple also entered, he having come first to the tomb, even he saw and believed.
John:20:9 For they did not yet know the Scripture, that it was necessary for Him to rise from the dead.
John:20:10 Then the disciples went away again to themselves.

Sure you have Mary supposedly running away on her own (John) but where is there running into Jesus on th way to the disciples? Where is Luke saying Mary Magdalene and the others telling all these things? Where is Mary saying 'We' do not know where they have laid him? You have left out the contradictions and claimed later you had them all in.

There are terms we aren't supposed to use here, but it should be clear what you are doing to maintain your denialist case that there are no contradictions or they can be explained. The fact that you leave them out shows they are contradictions, and terminal ones, too, and that you say they were in there where you obviously make an effort to leave them out is the epitome of denial and making the Bible say what you want, not what it actually says.

You are by no means the only one doing this. On my Other board a poster pasted all of the text about doubting Thomas, and said (with no explanation or case) "There is no contradiction". Faithbased denial of everything and inventing stuff to get over problems is par for the course, but I have rately seen a more egregious example than you editing the Bible to suit yourself and then denying you'd done that.

You are doing a grand job for the atheist case.

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 12743
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 444 times
Been thanked: 468 times

Re: How exactly did Jesus resurrection happen❓

Post #110

Post by 1213 »

TRANSPONDER wrote: Wed Feb 14, 2024 2:24 am You did not have it,
You think people can't read my posts? :D
TRANSPONDER wrote: Wed Feb 14, 2024 2:24 ambut let's say it was there.
1213 wrote: Thu Feb 08, 2024 4:15 am Matt.28:8 And going away from the tomb quickly, with fear and great joy, they ran to report to His disciples.
TRANSPONDER wrote: Wed Feb 14, 2024 2:24 amIt contradicts John who says that Mary (and the one with her) "We" do not know where they have laid him.
A person can say "we", even if all of them are not around.
My new book can be read freely from here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view

Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html

Post Reply