Hi,
Does true randomness actually exist? Or does it only seem like this since we're not aware of all the variables/elements involved?
Let's take roulette. It may seem random where the ball ends up but in the end it's all a matter of physics. So in this case 'randomness' is rather unpredictability (due to our limited knowledge).
Could you give an example of something that is truly random, meaning something which is not the necessary or logical consequence of a previous event?
Thanks.
Does true randomness actually exist?
Moderator: Moderators
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Post #2
As far as we know, the only truly random events are those at a quantum scale.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
Post #3
Which raises two further questions:McCulloch wrote:As far as we know, the only truly random events are those at a quantum scale.
1. Doesn't this make the non-quantum world determined then?
2. So these events at the quantum scale don't happen for a prior reason? They just ... happen?
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Post #4
1. If there is no 'hidden variables', then it would be probablistic not deterministic.Celsus wrote:Which raises two further questions:McCulloch wrote:As far as we know, the only truly random events are those at a quantum scale.
1. Doesn't this make the non-quantum world determined then?
2. So these events at the quantum scale don't happen for a prior reason? They just ... happen?
2. There are some events that some interpretations of the data that would be true.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
- youranilldonkey
- Student
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 1:32 am
Post #5
Quantum physics can be completely random, there is a chance that your electrons are "intertwined" with electrons on the other side of the universe and there is the probability that you will teleport there by sun rinse.Celsus wrote:Which raises two further questions:McCulloch wrote:As far as we know, the only truly random events are those at a quantum scale.
1. Doesn't this make the non-quantum world determined then?
2. So these events at the quantum scale don't happen for a prior reason? They just ... happen?
most physicists agree that these random uncertainties balance each other out in our macro-world. notably saying "you would have to wait many lifetimes of the universe for such an improbable effect to happen"
Although randomness can be seen with the naked eye, when scientists drop materials down to a thousandth of a degree of absolute zero. macro objects can begin to exhibit quantum physics due to every atom being at the same "frequency"
Science is split on the randomness and complexity of the human brain, some say that the human brain can be recreated into a computer with chips representing each neuron, others say quantum physics plays a part in our consciousness.
I doubt I answered much of anything, (it is 330 am) but I hope I intrigued you enough to check it out a little more.
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Post #6
McCulloch wrote:As far as we know, the only truly random events are those at a quantum scale.
Yes, except as far as it is affected by the quantum scale.Celsus wrote:Which raises two further questions:
1. Doesn't this make the non-quantum world determined then?
Yes, that is the meaning of random.Celsus wrote:2. So these events at the quantum scale don't happen for a prior reason? They just ... happen?
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
- brandon_norgaard
- Student
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:49 pm
- Location: Folsom, CA
- Contact:
Post #7
I believe this is the "Bohm Interpretation" of quantum physics. David Bohm theorized that quantum events are deterministic but appear to be random because they are caused to happen as they do by other quantum events that may be far, far away. I don't believe that this is the simplest explanation for the apparently random quantum events. I have concluded that the very laws of physics were put in place by a higher power. This is an entirely different concept, but bare with me. This higher power allows the laws of nature to control the workings of the universe most of the time at the macro level, but at the subatomic level, this higher power that may be called God is selecting the outcome.youranilldonkey wrote: Quantum physics can be completely random, there is a chance that your electrons are "intertwined" with electrons on the other side of the universe and there is the probability that you will teleport there by sun rinse.
I have heard some scientists who say that it is likely that quantum events have macro effects as a regular part of life. Certainly, the world is mostly deterministic, but if one looks closely at the details, then it is less deterministic. It is likely that sometimes, occasionally, there are noticeable events that occur whose origin is at least partially the result of a "random" quantum event that I have concluded are literally acts of God.youranilldonkey wrote: most physicists agree that these random uncertainties balance each other out in our macro-world. notably saying "you would have to wait many lifetimes of the universe for such an improbable effect to happen"
I believe quantum physics does play a part in our consciousness. I have concluded from experience that I have libertarian free will. Well, most of the time my actions are determined by the naturalistic workings of my body, but I do experience the intent to act on my own will. I have concluded that this is my soul making a decision how to act and this decision ends up determining the result of quantum events in my brain. This results in me carrying out the chosen action.youranilldonkey wrote: Science is split on the randomness and complexity of the human brain, some say that the human brain can be recreated into a computer with chips representing each neuron, others say quantum physics plays a part in our consciousness.
A little whimsical and eccentric, I will admit. I have come to these conclusion after much thought and discourse with others. I have a website that explains my ideas, and through which people can discuss this and other issues. Check it out EnlightenedWorldview.com[/url]