TrueReligion wrote:
No, I'am sorry, book of revelation is already described as fake, and not acknowledged by christians, and Ive shown it already,
But beside that, you have;nt showed any proof to authenticate the book of revelation.
تنزيل الكتب لا ريب �يه من رب العلمين
Tanzeelu alkitabi la rayba feehi min rabbi alAAalameena
32.2 The Book of Revelation, no doubt in it, from the Lord of the jinn and of mankind.
If it was certified by the authors of your book of faith, then you have no justification to reject it.
Further you never answered and justify your claim that muslims are illeterate, and that when was the arabic translation of bible done.
Observe these interesting comments by Lane…
Every language without a written literature tends to decay more than to development by reason of foreign influences; and the history of the Arabic exhibits an instance of decay remarkably rapid, and extraordinary in degree. An immediate consequence of the foreign conquests achieved by the Arabs under Mohammad’s first four successors was an extensive corruption of their language; for the nations that they subdued were naturally obliged to adopt in a great measure the speech of the conquerors, a speech which few persons have ever acquired in such a degree as to be secure from the commission of frequent errors in grammar without learning it from infancy….
Such being the case, it became a matter of the highest importance to the Arabs to preserve the knowledge of that speech which had thus become obsolescent, and to draw a distinct line between the classical and the post-classical languages. For the former language was that of the Kur-an and of the Traditions of Mohammad, the sources of their religious, moral, civil, criminal, and political code’ and they possessed, in that language, preserved by oral tradition, - for the art of writing, in Arabia, had been almost exclusively confined to Christians and Jews….
The classical language they called, by reason of its incomparable excellence, “el-loghah,� or “the language:� and the line between this and the post-classical was easily drawn, on account of the almost sudden commencement, and rapid progress, of the corruption.
….I often have found in my knowledge of modern Arabic a solution of a difficulty; but without great caution, such knowledge would frequently have misled me, in consequence of the changes which have taken place in the applications of many words since the classical age.
References:
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume one, pp. vii – viii; xxii - xxiii
It is quite inescapable that Islam’s “prophet�….which is not even mentioned in the Koran… did
NOT write the Koran…
Moreover…the authors, who did finally put pen to paper, and translated the Hebrew and Greek into Arabic, were more than likely Christians.
Lastly, the translation you showed , is totaly out of subject of Quran, check any translation of any language of world, you will find same translation as its posted. But your translation, is without any authentication, and therefore is not valid at all.
What Arabic words are bothering you...?
