I don't know if this topic is much debated but I found an interesting video of something I had never seen before.
I personally think suicide, under its extreme circumstances, is not reprehensible, because the right to live entails the right to die. Euthanasia is illegal in many places and I always thought about it as something private and hidden, but I've recently discovered that in Switzerland there's a legal organization called Dignitas (dignity) who practices assisted suicide on patients who request it. Here's the last part of a 5-part documentary (for those interested it begins here):
[youtube][/youtube]
Question for debate:
1. Do you find what Dignitas does right or wrong? Why (not)?
2. Is what the patient, Craig Ewert, did reprehensible from your point of view? Why (not)?
Right to die
Moderator: Moderators
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Post #31
Please prove this statement. Show that life violates entropy.AquinasD wrote:And this at most shows that life is not entropic. It works against entropy.jamesmorlock wrote:Life can only be temporary, since most things - as per thermodynamics - tend towards disorganization unless it's energy is increased or is being perpetuated by something.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Post #33
I think you are not using entropy in the same manner that scientists would use it. Entropy has nothing to do with order/disorder.. it has to do with the amount of usable energy.
Which is more ordered? Steam or ice? Which has more energy?? Steam or ice?
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
Post #34
I'm not the one who used entropy as meaning "systems tend towards disorder." That was James. I only responded in kind.Goat wrote:I think you are not using entropy in the same manner that scientists would use it. Entropy has nothing to do with order/disorder.. it has to do with the amount of usable energy.
Which is more ordered? Steam or ice? Which has more energy?? Steam or ice?