Where does your moral code come from?
The way I see it, either you don't know or you can't have one? And i don't see how such a thing could have evolved......
Anyhow, please tell me where, personally, your moral code comes from.
In the world of an Atheist who defines right and wrong?
Moderator: Moderators
Re: In the world of an Atheist who defines right and wrong?
Post #2My moral code appears to be subjective, not objective or universally true. That it is subjective does not stop me from having it.Jake_ wrote:Where does your moral code come from?
The way I see it, either you don't know or you can't have one? And i don't see how such a thing could have evolved......
Anyhow, please tell me where, personally, your moral code comes from.
My moral opinions come from the same place as everyone else's. I draw from my culture, what I was taught as a child, what I have accepted or rejected from others I have spoken with or whose works I've read. Most of it comes from the empathy that I've picked up either entirely from the teaching I've received or from something instinctual.
Many of my most cherished moral opinions are shared not only by other people, but are practiced by other primates and other types of animals, leading me to believe that evolution may have played an important role. I can think of what, to me, are good reasons why animals such as people who share my moral code have a survival advantage. But, at the same time, I can think of reasons why some moral values contrary to my own might also give a survival advantage. That would explain how both my moral views and the moral views of those I disagree with have both survived and how we can find analogous behavior in other animals.
Where, if I may ask in turn, does your God get his moral values from?
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: In the world of an Atheist who defines right and wrong?
Post #3Then you need to do a bit of reading. There are more than a few researchers investigating this very phenomenon. Your own personal incredibility on this matter does not mean that moral codes have not evolved.Jake_ wrote: And i don't see how such a thing [a moral code ] could have evolved......
My own perception of morality comes from the same place that my own perception of grammar or logic comes from: the society that I live and have lived in.Jake_ wrote: Anyhow, please tell me where, personally, your moral code comes from.
However, I believe that there are objective moral truths, just as there are objective mathematical and scientific truths.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: In the world of an Atheist who defines right and wrong?
Post #4My morality is a socially conditioned response, which in turn is based on empathy and reciprocal altruismJake_ wrote:Where does your moral code come from?
The way I see it, either you don't know or you can't have one? And i don't see how such a thing could have evolved......
Anyhow, please tell me where, personally, your moral code comes from.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
-
- Savant
- Posts: 9874
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
- Location: Planet Earth
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Re: In the world of an Atheist who defines right and wrong?
Post #5My moral code comes from me, via a combination of instincts and upbringing. In other words I define right and wrong.Jake_ wrote:Where does your moral code come from?
Do you need to be able to explain why you like the taste of something before you can say something is tasty?The way I see it, either you don't know or you can't have one?
It evolved the same way other traits evolved. Successful variation that's made it past the selection process.And i don't see how such a thing could have evolved......
You do see how a team working together might be more successful than individuals working seperately, right?
- ttruscott
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 11064
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
- Location: West Coast of Canada
- Been thanked: 3 times
Post #6
Ahhh, the great existential dilemma - I am my own god and I know that I am not godly....
the Christian God is assumed by them to be the source of all goodness.
The existential response:
I find goodness coming from myself.
I am therefore god (or as good as) and choosing for the whole world.
Why did satan fall again?
Peace, Ted
the Christian God is assumed by them to be the source of all goodness.
The existential response:
I find goodness coming from myself.
I am therefore god (or as good as) and choosing for the whole world.
Why did satan fall again?
Peace, Ted
PCE Theology as I see it...
We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.
This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.
We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.
This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Post #7
The road to hell is paved with Good intentions.ttruscott wrote:Ahhh, the great existential dilemma - I am my own god and I know that I am not godly....
the Christian God is assumed by them to be the source of all goodness.
The existential response:
I find goodness coming from myself.
I am therefore god (or as good as) and choosing for the whole world.
Why did satan fall again?
Peace, Ted
Why should I accept your choosing for me? I find my own goodness for me better than your claims for goodness for me.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
-
- Savant
- Posts: 9874
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
- Location: Planet Earth
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Post #8
Well if you define god merely as an arbitrator of goodness then the existential response would be: I am my own god and I know that I am godly.ttruscott wrote:Ahhh, the great existential dilemma - I am my own god and I know that I am not godly....
the Christian God is assumed by them to be the source of all goodness.
He crossed the wrong guy?Why did satan fall again?
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 8:44 am
- Location: Canada
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
objective moral truths
Post #9McCulloch wrote:
What are they? Where did they come from? Who established them? How were they arrived at?
"However, I believe that there are objective moral truths, just as there are objective mathematical and scientific truths."
What are they? Where did they come from? Who established them? How were they arrived at?
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 8:44 am
- Location: Canada
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Post #10
Thatguy wrote:
When you encounter other people with a different moral code, how do you determine which one is better? Or are they all equal? Who decides?My moral code appears to be subjective, not objective or universally true. That it is subjective does not stop me from having it.