Or is it contrary to it?
A number of questions may be asked and answered on a thread like this.
For example:
What is the principle of atonement?
What part does atonement play in scripture, and in the old and new covenants?
How can we know what does and does not reflect the character [and ways] of God?
The principle of atonement
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 4069
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:07 pm
- Has thanked: 105 times
- Been thanked: 64 times
Re: The principle of atonement
Post #91Well he handed it all to Adam. Why not hand it all to us as well?BusB wrote: IMHO, It seems you believe it should all be handed us the easy way like God is just some rich man that ought to spoil his children so that they never learn anything.
Ignorant of what?BusB wrote: If God did it all for us we would remain ignorant.
Adam was born with a "silver spoon". Isn't it reasonable to expect God to treat all his children fairly and equally?BusB wrote: The silver spoon mentality has been well proven to be the way of fools.
Re: The principle of atonement
Post #92You have your own way of seeing things.Justin108 wrote:Well he handed it all to Adam. Why not hand it all to us as well?BusB wrote: IMHO, It seems you believe it should all be handed us the easy way like God is just some rich man that ought to spoil his children so that they never learn anything.
Ignorant of what?BusB wrote: If God did it all for us we would remain ignorant.
Adam was born with a "silver spoon". Isn't it reasonable to expect God to treat all his children fairly and equally?BusB wrote: The silver spoon mentality has been well proven to be the way of fools.
Give me one good reason why I should seek to change your mind?
Re: The principle of atonement
Post #93Because... this is a debate site? If you didn't want to change my mind, why bother responding to me at all?BusB wrote:You have your own way of seeing things.Justin108 wrote:Well he handed it all to Adam. Why not hand it all to us as well?BusB wrote: IMHO, It seems you believe it should all be handed us the easy way like God is just some rich man that ought to spoil his children so that they never learn anything.
Ignorant of what?BusB wrote: If God did it all for us we would remain ignorant.
Adam was born with a "silver spoon". Isn't it reasonable to expect God to treat all his children fairly and equally?BusB wrote: The silver spoon mentality has been well proven to be the way of fools.
Give me one good reason why I should seek to change your mind?
Re: The principle of atonement
Post #94"Debate" is viewed one way by some people and another way by other people.Justin108 wrote:Because... this is a debate site? If you didn't want to change my mind, why bother responding to me at all?BusB wrote:You have your own way of seeing things.Justin108 wrote:Well he handed it all to Adam. Why not hand it all to us as well?BusB wrote: IMHO, It seems you believe it should all be handed us the easy way like God is just some rich man that ought to spoil his children so that they never learn anything.
Ignorant of what?BusB wrote: If God did it all for us we would remain ignorant.
Adam was born with a "silver spoon". Isn't it reasonable to expect God to treat all his children fairly and equally?BusB wrote: The silver spoon mentality has been well proven to be the way of fools.
Give me one good reason why I should seek to change your mind?
There is "contentious debate" and then there can also be "meaningful debate. "
What determines the difference? Whether or not the person is debating genuinely to find answers or they are debating just for the thrill of outdoing someone else.
If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking. But if they are not really interested in truth and debating only to show their superior intellect, then there will be little or no effort by them to see any points made by others. The later situation is but futile contending.
Re: The principle of atonement
Post #95Only if the points made by the opposition is good enough to change my thinking. You haven't made a single point good enough to do that. Now instead of questioning my intentions, can you address my arguments? If not, then stop replying to my posts.BusB wrote: If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking.
Re: The principle of atonement
Post #96Nor am I trying to.Justin108 wrote:Only if the points made by the opposition is good enough to change my thinking. You haven't made a single point good enough to do that. Now instead of questioning my intentions, can you address my arguments? If not, then stop replying to my posts.BusB wrote: If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking.

I also have to accept things like that I am not strong enough to pick up a truck. So why would I try to pick up a truck?

Re: The principle of atonement
Post #97So you admit you're unable to form rebuttals to my points?BusB wrote:Nor am I trying to.Justin108 wrote:Only if the points made by the opposition is good enough to change my thinking. You haven't made a single point good enough to do that. Now instead of questioning my intentions, can you address my arguments? If not, then stop replying to my posts.BusB wrote: If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking.![]()
I also have to accept things like that I am not strong enough to pick up a truck. So why would I try to pick up a truck?
Re: The principle of atonement
Post #98I know that I am relatively inferior to many if not most people.Justin108 wrote:So you admit you're unable to form rebuttals to my points?BusB wrote:Nor am I trying to.Justin108 wrote:Only if the points made by the opposition is good enough to change my thinking. You haven't made a single point good enough to do that. Now instead of questioning my intentions, can you address my arguments? If not, then stop replying to my posts.BusB wrote: If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking.![]()
I also have to accept things like that I am not strong enough to pick up a truck. So why would I try to pick up a truck?

Are you familiar with the analogy of mankind as one body?
Re: The principle of atonement
Post #99No but I'm not particularly interested either. If you do not intend to debate the points I raise, please refrain from responding to me. Thank youBusB wrote:I know that I am relatively inferior to many if not most people.Justin108 wrote:So you admit you're unable to form rebuttals to my points?BusB wrote:Nor am I trying to.Justin108 wrote:Only if the points made by the opposition is good enough to change my thinking. You haven't made a single point good enough to do that. Now instead of questioning my intentions, can you address my arguments? If not, then stop replying to my posts.BusB wrote: If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking.![]()
I also have to accept things like that I am not strong enough to pick up a truck. So why would I try to pick up a truck?![]()
Are you familiar with why the analogy of mankind as one body?
Re: The principle of atonement
Post #100You demand a quick answer but you wouldn't understand the quick answer it because you refuse to let anyone to first prepare you so that you can understand,Justin108 wrote:No but I'm not particularly interested either. If you do not intend to debate the points I raise, please refrain from responding to me. Thank youBusB wrote:I know that I am relatively inferior to many if not most people.Justin108 wrote:So you admit you're unable to form rebuttals to my points?BusB wrote:Nor am I trying to.Justin108 wrote:Only if the points made by the opposition is good enough to change my thinking. You haven't made a single point good enough to do that. Now instead of questioning my intentions, can you address my arguments? If not, then stop replying to my posts.BusB wrote: If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking.![]()
I also have to accept things like that I am not strong enough to pick up a truck. So why would I try to pick up a truck?![]()
Are you familiar with why the analogy of mankind as one body?
When quick answers are given, you just attack them as being wrong and still refuse to let anyone help you become equipped to see why what you think is wrong is not what you think.
That is an unfortunate situation and I feel for you because I know you can't see that you do that.
IMHO, all you are actually allowing me to tell you is that you need to think more about what honestly inspecting the answers of others requires.
I used to be just like that and so I recognize it. I, too, learn the hard way.