What is evolution and how do we know it's right?

Creationism, Evolution, and other science issues

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Autodidact
Prodigy
Posts: 3014
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:18 pm

What is evolution and how do we know it's right?

Post #1

Post by Autodidact »

This thread was started in response to HaLi, to talk about what the Theory of Evolution (ToE) is and how science knows that it is correct.

Neandertal Ned
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:42 pm

Post #1221

Post by Neandertal Ned »

Brian Of Nazareth wrote:
Neandertal Ned wrote: True. Same goes for Darwinism and any claim of humans being apes.

Why do you think you're an ape? Did someone tell you that or did you just read it in a book?
When it comes to books, I have read more than one.
The more books you read about your being an ape the more likely you are to think you are!

User avatar
Brian Of Nazareth
Student
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 4:23 pm

Post #1222

Post by Brian Of Nazareth »

Neandertal Ned wrote:
Brian Of Nazareth wrote:
Neandertal Ned wrote: True. Same goes for Darwinism and any claim of humans being apes.

Why do you think you're an ape? Did someone tell you that or did you just read it in a book?
When it comes to books, I have read more than one.
The more books you read about your being an ape the more likely you are to think you are!
Yet it only takes one book to be a believer! Doesn't your assertion make you the more credulous?

Neandertal Ned
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:42 pm

Post #1223

Post by Neandertal Ned »

Brian Of Nazareth wrote:
Neandertal Ned wrote:
Brian Of Nazareth wrote:
Neandertal Ned wrote: True. Same goes for Darwinism and any claim of humans being apes.

Why do you think you're an ape? Did someone tell you that or did you just read it in a book?
When it comes to books, I have read more than one.
The more books you read about your being an ape the more likely you are to think you are!
Yet it only takes one book to be a believer! Doesn't your assertion make you the more credulous?
Depends which book you are talking about. You are not making that clear.

I was indoctrinated into believing in Darwinism by reading books myself. It took more than one book to emancipate me from the dogmatic doctrines of Darwinism.

User avatar
Brian Of Nazareth
Student
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 4:23 pm

Post #1224

Post by Brian Of Nazareth »

I was making a facetious jibe about the bible, as apparently it is inerrant.

What made you decide that the overwhelming majority of consensus science was less likely to be accurate than a selectively edited and dubiously translated heresy of judaism and plagarised oral tradition?

Neandertal Ned
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:42 pm

Post #1225

Post by Neandertal Ned »

Brian Of Nazareth wrote: I was making a facetious jibe about the bible, as apparently it is inerrant.

What made you decide that the overwhelming majority of consensus science was less likely to be accurate than a selectively edited and dubiously translated heresy of judaism and plagarised oral tradition?
I read up on creation science and Christian Reconstruction and decided to throw in my lot with men of God rather than apemen. Been reading books for over 50 years now and you have to make up your mind sometime.

User avatar
Brian Of Nazareth
Student
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 4:23 pm

Post #1226

Post by Brian Of Nazareth »

Neandertal Ned wrote:
Brian Of Nazareth wrote: I was making a facetious jibe about the bible, as apparently it is inerrant.

What made you decide that the overwhelming majority of consensus science was less likely to be accurate than a selectively edited and dubiously translated heresy of judaism and plagarised oral tradition?
I read up on creation science and Christian Reconstruction and decided to throw in my lot with men of God rather than apemen. Been reading books for over 50 years now and you have to make up your mind sometime.
I appreciate your honesty. I've only been reading books for 30 odd years and reached a different conclusion but life would be so dull if we all thought the same.

Neandertal Ned
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:42 pm

Post #1227

Post by Neandertal Ned »

Brian Of Nazareth wrote:
Neandertal Ned wrote:
Brian Of Nazareth wrote: I was making a facetious jibe about the bible, as apparently it is inerrant.

What made you decide that the overwhelming majority of consensus science was less likely to be accurate than a selectively edited and dubiously translated heresy of judaism and plagarised oral tradition?
I read up on creation science and Christian Reconstruction and decided to throw in my lot with men of God rather than apemen. Been reading books for over 50 years now and you have to make up your mind sometime.
I appreciate your honesty. I've only been reading books for 30 odd years and reached a different conclusion but life would be so dull if we all thought the same.
My thinking started to change as I turned 50 after a series of devasting setbacks in my personal life. I had previously thought that changing my thinking to thinking like a Christian would be as natural as thinking like a Darwinist or Marxist but finally had to admit that it was the supernatural work of the Holy Spirit after reading up on Christian doctrine and Christian psychology. I think the human mind, being the seat of consciousness, is supernatural itself since the concept of a self-conscious, self-effacing and moralizing brain seems ridiculous to me.

Bust Nak
Savant
Posts: 9874
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
Location: Planet Earth
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 267 times

Post #1228

Post by Bust Nak »

Neandertal Ned wrote: Let me check it out with Reverend Sharpton and Reverend Jackson, and I'll get back to you.
Ok.
I am more impressed by the rise of Islamic Creationsim throughout the Islamic world than the opions of a part-time imam in Britain.
None the less, are you willing to accept that some Muslims acceps evolution and have no problem with referring to themselves as apes, nor find it offensive when others refer to them as apes?

Neandertal Ned
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:42 pm

Post #1229

Post by Neandertal Ned »

Bust Nak wrote:
Neandertal Ned wrote:
I am more impressed by the rise of Islamic Creationsim throughout the Islamic world than the opions of a part-time imam in Britain.
None the less, are you willing to accept that some Muslims acceps evolution and have no problem with referring to themselves as apes, nor find it offensive when others refer to them as apes?
There is no doubt about the fact that some Muslims go along with evolutionary ideology and psychology up to a certain point but I am am not certain that they have thought through the implications of such atheistic beliefs or that they do not have a problem with referring to themselves as apes or finding it offensive when others refer to them, Prophet Muhammed and other Muslims as apes. Does your part-time British Imam have no problem believing in an atheistic belief system or with referring to himself and Prophet Muhammed as apes or finding it offensive when others refer to him, other Muslims and Prophet Muhammed as apes? You can quote him at length if you like.

User avatar
ThatGirlAgain
Prodigy
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:09 pm
Location: New York City
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #1230

Post by ThatGirlAgain »

Ozgirl wrote: You are all pretenders. Why don't you refute me?

The answer is because you cant.

All you can do from here on in is chase your tail.

...

You keep at Ned like as if you have something intelligent to say.
Moderator Comment

Your phrasing is less than civil. Please debate the issues only and not make comments about other debaters.

Please review the Rules.


______________

Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster.

Post Reply