Give one reason or argument that God doesnt exist
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 6:05 pm
Give one reason or argument that God doesnt exist
Post #1Try and give one reason philosophically or scientifically that God doesnt exist, but not one emotionally.
Post #121
Um, no it doesn't. *shrug* An unfounded assertion can be dismissed.olavisjo wrote:If God created the universe then that would be a fact. And at this moment it would appear that is indeed the fact of the matter.Artie wrote: Sorry but facts don't apply with creationism and can't be determined by creationism. "Faith is belief in inspiration, revelation, or authority. The word faith generally refers to a belief that is held with lack of, in spite of or against reason and evidence." Creationism is a tenet of a belief system held with "lack of, in spite of or against reason and evidence." Facts are determined using logic and reason and evidence not gods, inspiration, revelation or authority. http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/ ... ality.html
I call shenanigans. We know nothing of the kind--and are you talking about "machines" or "cells?"We know that chance can't create reproducing machines, we need intelligence to do that. This intelligence can be human, alien or divine; but intelligence is needed.Artie wrote: So if humans evolve and become intelligent enough to make self replicating car engines we also automatically become gods since only gods can make self replicating car engines?
Did your god personally assemble each different flagellum or did your god produce all the different dna codes that assemble each different flagellum or what exactly is it your god is supposed to have created?
And, nobody said anything about "chance." Where are you getting this? Natural selection is anything BUT "chance."
Post #122
Cells are small complex machines.Boots wrote: I call shenanigans. We know nothing of the kind--and are you talking about "machines" or "cells?"
Interesting, you have found a way to do natural selection without random mutations, you must be talking about intelligent design.Boots wrote: And, nobody said anything about "chance." Where are you getting this? Natural selection is anything BUT "chance."
"I believe in no religion. There is absolutely no proof for any of them, and from a philosophical standpoint Christianity is not even the best. All religions, that is, all mythologies to give them their proper name, are merely man’s own invention..."
C.S. Lewis
C.S. Lewis
- Filthy Tugboat
- Guru
- Posts: 1726
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:55 pm
- Location: Australia
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #123
To my knowledge, the above quoted assertion has no basis in reality. What leads you to the conclusion that it is "known" that reproducing machines cannot occur by means of chance? What leads you to the conclusion that intelligence is a necessary prerequisite for reproducing machine's to exist?olavisjo wrote:We know that chance can't create reproducing machines, we need intelligence to do that. This intelligence can be human, alien or divine; but intelligence is needed.Artie wrote: So if humans evolve and become intelligent enough to make self replicating car engines we also automatically become gods since only gods can make self replicating car engines?
Did your god personally assemble each different flagellum or did your god produce all the different dna codes that assemble each different flagellum or what exactly is it your god is supposed to have created?
Provide one example of reproducing machine's being "created" and then show that intelligence caused the creation of reproducing machines.
Religion feels to me a little like a Nigerian Prince scam. The "offer" is illegitimate, the "request" is unreasonable and the source is dubious, in fact, Nigeria doesn't even have a royal family.
- southern cross
- Banned
- Posts: 1059
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:14 am
Re: Give one reason or argument that God doesnt exist
Post #124Theists believe it does.austin12345 wrote: Try and give one reason philosophically or scientifically that God doesnt exist, but not one emotionally.
Post #125
To find, by chance, the DNA combinations required for the simplest reproducing machine would take far longer than the universe will exist.Filthy Tugboat wrote: What leads you to the conclusion that it is "known" that reproducing machines cannot occur by means of chance? What leads you to the conclusion that intelligence is a necessary prerequisite for reproducing machine's to exist?
A computer virus will reproduce itself, and they are caused by humans.Filthy Tugboat wrote: Provide one example of reproducing machine's being "created" and then show that intelligence caused the creation of reproducing machines.
"I believe in no religion. There is absolutely no proof for any of them, and from a philosophical standpoint Christianity is not even the best. All religions, that is, all mythologies to give them their proper name, are merely man’s own invention..."
C.S. Lewis
C.S. Lewis
- Filthy Tugboat
- Guru
- Posts: 1726
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:55 pm
- Location: Australia
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #126
So basically you're saying that because finding the answer to this question will be difficult or impossible, we will just assume that the answer is in the negative? And, I believe, you consider yourself to be an advocate of critical thinking?olavisjo wrote:To find, by chance, the DNA combinations required for the simplest reproducing machine would take far longer than the universe will exist.Filthy Tugboat wrote: What leads you to the conclusion that it is "known" that reproducing machines cannot occur by means of chance? What leads you to the conclusion that intelligence is a necessary prerequisite for reproducing machine's to exist?
Will you retract your claim as you have admitted that you are incapable of providing support for it?
A computer virus will reproduce itself, and they are caused by humans.[/quote]Filthy Tugboat wrote: Provide one example of reproducing machine's being "created" and then show that intelligence caused the creation of reproducing machines.
I think it is worthy of note that a computer virus is not a machine.
Religion feels to me a little like a Nigerian Prince scam. The "offer" is illegitimate, the "request" is unreasonable and the source is dubious, in fact, Nigeria doesn't even have a royal family.
- southern cross
- Banned
- Posts: 1059
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:14 am
Post #127
[Replying to post 125 by olavisjo]
Must have been one hell of a smart cookie to produce DNA from scratch, yeah?To find, by chance, the DNA combinations required for the simplest reproducing machine would take far longer than the universe will exist.
Post #128
[Replying to post 126 by Filthy Tugboat]
This topic is not about evolution so I will post my reply here...
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 891#548891
This topic is not about evolution so I will post my reply here...
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 891#548891
"I believe in no religion. There is absolutely no proof for any of them, and from a philosophical standpoint Christianity is not even the best. All religions, that is, all mythologies to give them their proper name, are merely man’s own invention..."
C.S. Lewis
C.S. Lewis
- southern cross
- Banned
- Posts: 1059
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:14 am
Post #129
but, but, but I was responding to your post.
southern cross wrote: [Replying to post 125 by olavisjo]Must have been one hell of a smart cookie to produce DNA from scratch, yeah?To find, by chance, the DNA combinations required for the simplest reproducing machine would take far longer than the universe will exist.
Post #130
Fortunately, there are other means of bacterial motility. Gliding is of particular interest here, as it is observed in multiple species and apparently uses several mechanisms.olavisjo wrote: The bacterial flagellum is one of those complex organs where the parts can't evolve gradually because they would not have any function until they are complete.
Biologists have discovered a type III secretory system that is made up of 1/4 the parts of the flagellum. They have argued that the flagellum has "co-opted" parts from the secretory system and used them in entirely novel ways.
One problem with this idea is that the need for mobility would have evolved long before the need for the secretory system so the secretory system would have evolved from the flagellum; not the other way around.
I wish I could provide a synopsis, but this will have to do: http://www.talkdesign.org/faqs/flagellum.html#fig5The other problem is that even if the flagellum had evolved from the secretory system it would need far too many intermediate steps to become a flagellum. And there is no evidence for even one of those steps.
I think a more interesting question is why, if one flagellar system is so complex as to require the intervention of a biological engineer, said engineer designed three of them and ensured they were highly conserved between domains?