I remember a TV preacher once asking his broadcast audience, "If you were Satan....." I don't remember the rest of the question, but I seem to remember that he was talking about prophecy and arguing that Satan was up to some diabolical mischief ("If you were Satan, isn't that what you would do?").
A lot of detail in Christian scripture about what is to happen before Jesus returns is tied to the activity of "Satan". The appearance of the "antichrist", in particular, is supposed to be part of Satan's last gambit before he goes down to utter defeat.
Since it was asked of me how I would react if I were Satan, I think it's fair for me to answer. I know that "Satan" is supposed to be a being of superhuman intelligence, but I can't help thinking that if such a being actually existed and if I were that being, I could do a lot better.
If I were "Satan", I would scrap the antichrist plan. If it's all laid out in the Bible, then everyone knows what to expect and you've lost the element of surprise. With that one simple deviation from the prophetic scenario, the whole thing would be gummed up. No antichrist, no mark of the beast, no abomination of desolation, no anything I was supposed to do as Satan to set the stage for the return of Jesus. And without those prophetic components in place, Jesus couldn't return to fulfill prophecy. And how could anyone stop me? I wouldn't be taking some action which could be prevented; I would be defeating prophecy by not taking action.
So let me pass the preacher's question on to you. If you were "Satan", what would you do----or not do----to thwart prophecy?
If you were Satan....
Moderator: Moderators
-
Athetotheist
- Prodigy
- Posts: 4026
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 724 times
- The Nice Centurion
- Guru
- Posts: 1011
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:47 pm
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 107 times
Re: If you were Satan....
Post #191Fair enough, but that goes for you too!Athetotheist wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 2:47 pm [Replying to The Nice Centurion in post #148Their best isn't enough.LDS do their best this days to get accepted into mainstream christianity.
Fair enough, but stating an opinion doesn't justify it.I didnt say mainstream christianity is always right, but said that in some certain question mainstream christianity and I tend to have the same opinion.
And it is not yours.
Your making a question for debate, than only allowing answers that serve your own opinion is senseless.
And when it comes to theorys about unproven beings behaviour, diverging opinios and theorys are natural!
Yes, or No?
As above; Everyone is allowed to have his opinion.Athetotheist wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 3:05 pmAnd I'm accused of not arguing rationally.The Nice Centurion wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 4:10 amThe Greatest Trick Satan Ever Pulled Was Convincing the World it were not flat !!!
You are not obliged to share it, pal.
(Still your OP is in a context that declares Satan true, which would declare christian mythology true, which in turn would declare bible true, which logically following would declare biblical facts true and that would declare biblical fact of flat earth true. Therefore we should speculate how the disaster of flat earh denying came to be. Satan is a common and welcome suspect!)
I understand that this is your opinion, but dont you think that you could explain how your revolutionary conclusion masters above obstacles?Athetotheist wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 2:53 pmI wasn't asking about "Satan" thwarting prophecy "in context with mainstream Christianity"; if "Satan" were to thwart Christian prophecy, that would invalidate it.The Nice Centurion wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 2:48 am [Replying to JehovahsWitness in post #163]
Yeah, heres a main obstacle that the OP chooses to ignore. Mainstream christianity will never give that prophecy can be thwarted. Yet the OP wants an explanation of how Satan THWARTS PROPHECY IN CONTEXT WITH MAINSTREAM CHRISTIANITY.
This is far from rational. OP accepts only an impossible to give answer. But didnt write so in the OP.
Or else believers would be right to just negate your theory as impossible. Unbelievers would see too the problems your unsustained opinion states.
Extraordinary claims need extraordinary substitution.
That goes not only for Jesus resurrection, but also for our friend Satan hypothetically thwarting prophecy.
If I had the opinion that the earth is a cube and were saying; "Now the fact that I say earth is a cube disproves that the earth is flat!" I could get laughed at as long as didnt even try to get ride of cube earth denying counter arguments.
“If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. But if you drown a man in a fish pond, he will never have to go hungry again
”
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon
"
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates
"
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates
-
Athetotheist
- Prodigy
- Posts: 4026
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 724 times
Re: If you were Satan....
Post #192[Replying to The Nice Centurion in post #191
Instead of constantly trying to one-up me, how about just answering the initial question?
My initial question was what you would do to thwart Christian prophecy if you were "Satan". In all the meandering through the Left Behind series, comic book characters, Nephites etc., have you even tried to answer it?Your making a question for debate, than only allowing answers that serve your own opinion is senseless.
I was assuming that "Satan" existed for the sake of argument.As above; Everyone is allowed to have his opinion.
You are not obliged to share it, pal.
(Still your OP is in a context that declares Satan true, which would declare christian mythology true, which in turn would declare bible true, which logically following would declare biblical facts true and that would declare biblical fact of flat earth true. Therefore we should speculate how the disaster of flat earh denying came to be. Satan is a common and welcome suspect!)
That seems to be what you're trying to do. You've had "Satan" wanting a comic-book supervillain showdown, inviting his own demise to fool those who think he might not, fooling BoM Nephites in order to fool present-day LDS----you've had him doing just about everything except.....nothing. And you present all of these as "problems", as if any of them would be a more likely course for a dedicated rebel than the course I suggested. And how would believers "negate" my theory as impossible? By simply denying its theoretical possibility? How would that make it theoretically impossible?Or else believers would be right to just negate your theory as impossible.
Instead of constantly trying to one-up me, how about just answering the initial question?
- William
- Savant
- Posts: 16490
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
- Location: Te Waipounamu
- Has thanked: 1037 times
- Been thanked: 1950 times
- Contact:
Re: If you were Satan....
Post #193Of course.Athetotheist wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 1:07 am [Replying to William in post #141Then Jesus not having returned would suggest that the components aren't in place, wouldn't it?Well...since you stated "And without those prophetic components in place, Jesus couldn't return to fulfill prophecy." so if Jesus did return, the components must have been in place whether they were understood or not.
But that wouldn't necessarily mean that prophecy has therefore been thwarted, right?
- The Nice Centurion
- Guru
- Posts: 1011
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:47 pm
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 107 times
Re: If you were Satan....
Post #194Yes, my above answer was essentially: "If I were Satan and would want to thwart christian prophecy, I would try to do things exactly reverse to christian prophecy!".Athetotheist wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:27 am [Replying to The Nice Centurion in post #191My initial question was what you would do to thwart Christian prophecy if you were "Satan". In all the meandering through the Left Behind series, comic book characters, Nephites etc., have you even tried to answer it?Your making a question for debate, than only allowing answers that serve your own opinion is senseless.
In your OP you give reason to suspect that it might be so for you. Sure.Athetotheist wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:27 amI was assuming that "Satan" existed for the sake of argument.As above; Everyone is allowed to have his opinion.
You are not obliged to share it, pal.
(Still your OP is in a context that declares Satan true, which would declare christian mythology true, which in turn would declare bible true, which logically following would declare biblical facts true and that would declare biblical fact of flat earth true. Therefore we should speculate how the disaster of flat earh denying came to be. Satan is a common and welcome suspect!)
But in either case Satan would come not without his mythological environment.
If you assume Snow White is real for the sake of argument, everybody would see that it logically follows for your sake of argument to also include the 7 Dwarfs, the wood, the Witch . . .
Jehovahs Witness already did in this very thread.Athetotheist wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:27 amThat seems to be what you're trying to do. You've had "Satan" wanting a comic-book supervillain showdown, inviting his own demise to fool those who think he might not, fooling BoM Nephites in order to fool present-day LDS----you've had him doing just about everything except.....nothing. And you present all of these as "problems", as if any of them would be a more likely course for a dedicated rebel than the course I suggested. And how would believers "negate" my theory as impossible? By simply denying its theoretical possibility? How would that make it theoretically impossible?Or else believers would be right to just negate your theory as impossible.
For believers their mythology automatically includes the theoretical impossibility of prophecys.
THATS WHAT MAKES THEM PROPHECYS.
When confronting believers it would be better for your success to first argue/give reasons for the theoretical possibility before asking about the thereafter.
I have and you did not like my answer, for reasons unknown to me either, or cause you allow only an answer where Satan stays inactive - Your Opinion.Athetotheist wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:27 am Instead of constantly trying to one-up me, how about just answering the initial question?
“If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. But if you drown a man in a fish pond, he will never have to go hungry again
”
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon
"
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates
"
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates
- The Nice Centurion
- Guru
- Posts: 1011
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:47 pm
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 107 times
Re: If you were Satan....
Post #195Right! But the OP wouldnt want to hear any of this.William wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 2:27 amOf course.Athetotheist wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 1:07 am [Replying to William in post #141Then Jesus not having returned would suggest that the components aren't in place, wouldn't it?Well...since you stated "And without those prophetic components in place, Jesus couldn't return to fulfill prophecy." so if Jesus did return, the components must have been in place whether they were understood or not.
But that wouldn't necessarily mean that prophecy has therefore been thwarted, right?
“If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. But if you drown a man in a fish pond, he will never have to go hungry again
”
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon
"
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates
"
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates
- 1213
- Savant
- Posts: 13597
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 519 times
- Been thanked: 518 times
Re: If you were Satan....
Post #196Why do you think so?The Nice Centurion wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 4:10 amThe Greatest Trick Satan Ever Pulled Was Convincing the World it were not flat !!!
My new book can be read freely from here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view
Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view
Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html
- The Nice Centurion
- Guru
- Posts: 1011
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:47 pm
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 107 times
Re: If you were Satan....
Post #197But we have no evidence if prophecy is ever real.Tcg wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 2:23 amWhat you may or may not believe is irrelevant in a sub-forum dedicated to debate. Evidence is what is needed here. Your claim of what you believe is evidence only that you claim to believe something. It isn't evidence that your belief is valid. In fact, it is perfectly useless here.
Tcg
So its impossible to prove if or not prophecy can be thwarted.
One can theorize, hypothetice, tell his opinion, tell his belief, tell what mainstream belief says about it . . .
But thats about all.
“If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. But if you drown a man in a fish pond, he will never have to go hungry again
”
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon
"
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates
"
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates
-
Athetotheist
- Prodigy
- Posts: 4026
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 724 times
Re: If you were Satan....
Post #198If "Satan" refused to carry out his role in prophecy, it would be thwarted whether believers were willing to accept that or not. That seems to be what you don't want to hear.The Nice Centurion wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 2:45 amRight! But the OP wouldnt want to hear any of this.William wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 2:27 amOf course.Athetotheist wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 1:07 am [Replying to William in post #141Then Jesus not having returned would suggest that the components aren't in place, wouldn't it?Well...since you stated "And without those prophetic components in place, Jesus couldn't return to fulfill prophecy." so if Jesus did return, the components must have been in place whether they were understood or not.
But that wouldn't necessarily mean that prophecy has therefore been thwarted, right?
You yourself have acknowleged that Jesus is technically late in returning, so if----as Christian prophecy says----his return is supposed to follow the appearance of the antichrist, a refusal by "Satan" to send an antichrist would be a logical conclusion as to the cause of Jesus being late in returning.
- The Nice Centurion
- Guru
- Posts: 1011
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:47 pm
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 107 times
Re: If you were Satan....
Post #199So do you therefore logically conclude that in this way Satan has already thwarted Christs Second Coming prophecy?Athetotheist wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 8:42 amIf "Satan" refused to carry out his role in prophecy, it would be thwarted whether believers were willing to accept that or not. That seems to be what you don't want to hear.The Nice Centurion wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 2:45 amRight! But the OP wouldnt want to hear any of this.William wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 2:27 amOf course.Athetotheist wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 1:07 am [Replying to William in post #141Then Jesus not having returned would suggest that the components aren't in place, wouldn't it?Well...since you stated "And without those prophetic components in place, Jesus couldn't return to fulfill prophecy." so if Jesus did return, the components must have been in place whether they were understood or not.
But that wouldn't necessarily mean that prophecy has therefore been thwarted, right?
You yourself have acknowleged that Jesus is technically late in returning, so if----as Christian prophecy says----his return is supposed to follow the appearance of the antichrist, a refusal by "Satan" to send an antichrist would be a logical conclusion as to the cause of Jesus being late in returning.
If not; How much time more must pass until he has?
And why do you not comment on my answer to your OP question?
“If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. But if you drown a man in a fish pond, he will never have to go hungry again
”
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon
"
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates
"
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates
- The Nice Centurion
- Guru
- Posts: 1011
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:47 pm
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 107 times
Re: If you were Satan....
Post #200Here come some threads we will need to study while futher debating here;
viewtopic.php?t=34918
viewtopic.php?t=39248
viewtopic.php?t=39445
viewtopic.php?t=34551
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=35542
viewtopic.php?p=917135#p917135
viewtopic.php?p=383702#p383702
viewtopic.php?p=352728#p352728
viewtopic.php?p=283777&hilit=Armageddon#p283777
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=9224
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=6427
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=33396
viewtopic.php?t=1386
viewtopic.php?t=1158
viewtopic.php?t=34918
viewtopic.php?t=39248
viewtopic.php?t=39445
viewtopic.php?t=34551
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=35542
viewtopic.php?p=917135#p917135
viewtopic.php?p=383702#p383702
viewtopic.php?p=352728#p352728
viewtopic.php?p=283777&hilit=Armageddon#p283777
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=9224
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=6427
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=33396
viewtopic.php?t=1386
viewtopic.php?t=1158
“If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. But if you drown a man in a fish pond, he will never have to go hungry again
”
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon
"
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates
"
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates

