Is Jesus mediator only for the “anointed class” of JW’s?

[MissKate13]

If true, then WHO mediates for the rest of the Jehovah’s Witnesses?

[tam]

Peace to you,

[Replying to tam in post #96]

If you don't like the fact there will be Christian going to heaven to be rulers over other Christians

It has nothing to do with 'like' or 'dislike'; it has to do with the fact that your claim is untrue. You have provided no scripture stating that Christians will reign over other Christians. There is no such teaching in what is written. Christ did not teach it. The apostles did not teach it. Paul did not teach it.


Peace again to you.

[tam]

Peace to you,

[Replying to tam in post #96]

If one isn't a Christian that is going to be a King and priest then what are they?

A non-Christian.

Possibly a disciple not (yet) anointed with holy spirit.

But all Christians are the Bride, the Church, the Body of Christ. There was no such teaching from Christ or the apostles or Paul as a Christian who was not part of the Body of Christ, who was not the Church, the Bride. ALL Christians were the Bride, the Church, the Body of Christ.



Peace again to you.

Wait, now you think that the rulers in Heaven will not be Christians? What?! Just when I think I've heard it all.

Of course not. Perhaps your question was less than clear?


If one is not a Christian reigning in the Kingdom, then one is a non-Christian (not reigning in the Kingdom).



Peace again to you.

[2timothy316]

Peace to you,

[Replying to tam in post #96]

If you don't like the fact there will be Christian going to heaven to be rulers over other Christians

It has nothing to do with 'like' or 'dislike'; it has to do with the fact that your claim is untrue.

I hate to burst your bubble.

Isaiah 32:1, 2 is clearly part of a Messianic prophecy and describes the benefits rendered by such “princes” under the Kingdom rule. Compare Heb 2:5, 8, "For it is not to angels that he has subjected the inhabited earth to come, about which we are speaking." BTW Paul wrote that.

[2timothy316]

Peace to you,

[Replying to tam in post #96]

If one isn't a Christian that is going to be a King and priest then what are they?

A non-Christian.

Possibly a disciple not (yet) anointed with holy spirit.

But all Christians are the Bride, the Church, the Body of Christ. There was no such teaching from Christ or the apostles or Paul as a Christian who was not part of the Body of Christ, who was not the Church, the Bride. ALL Christians were the Bride, the Church, the Body of Christ.



Peace again to you.

Wait, now you think that the rulers in Heaven will not be Christians? What?! Just when I think I've heard it all.

Of course not. Perhaps your question was less than clear?


If one is not a Christian reigning in the Kingdom, then one is a non-Christian (not reigning in the Kingdom).

Are intentionally trying to be confusing? I guess I have to be SUPER simple in my questions.

Will there be Christians who will live forever on the Earth? Yes or no.

[tam]

Peace to you,

Peace to you,

[Replying to tam in post #96]

If you don't like the fact there will be Christian going to heaven to be rulers over other Christians

It has nothing to do with 'like' or 'dislike'; it has to do with the fact that your claim is untrue.

I hate to burst your bubble.

I don't think my bubble is the one to be burst here...

Isaiah 32:1, 2 is clearly part of a Messianic prophecy and describes the benefits rendered by such “princes” under the Kingdom rule.

See, a king will reign in righteousness
and rulers will rule with justice.


Isaiah speaks of there being a king and rulers. Something I have certainly never argued against.

What the verse does not say is that Christians will reign over other Christians.

Compare Heb 2:5, 8, "For it is not to angels that he has subjected the inhabited earth to come, about which we are speaking." BTW Paul wrote that.

Regardless of who wrote Hebrews (not Paul, but it doesn't matter), Hebrews says nothing about Christians reigning over other Christians.


Peace again to you.

[2timothy316]

Peace to you,

Peace to you,

[Replying to tam in post #96]

If you don't like the fact there will be Christian going to heaven to be rulers over other Christians

It has nothing to do with 'like' or 'dislike'; it has to do with the fact that your claim is untrue.

I hate to burst your bubble.

I don't think my bubble is the one to be burst here...

Isaiah 32:1, 2 is clearly part of a Messianic prophecy and describes the benefits rendered by such “princes” under the Kingdom rule.

See, a king will reign in righteousness
and rulers will rule with justice.


Isaiah speaks of there being a king and rulers. Something I have certainly never argued against.

What the verse does not say is that Christians will reign over other Christians.

Compare Heb 2:5, 8, "For it is not to angels that he has subjected the inhabited earth to come, about which we are speaking." BTW Paul wrote that.

Regardless of who wrote Hebrews (not Paul, but it doesn't matter), Hebrews says nothing about Christians reigning over other Christians.


Peace again to you.

Yeah because apparently you believe that it will non-Christians that will reign over Christians.

[tam]

Peace to you,

Peace to you,

[Replying to tam in post #96]

If one isn't a Christian that is going to be a King and priest then what are they?

A non-Christian.

Possibly a disciple not (yet) anointed with holy spirit.

But all Christians are the Bride, the Church, the Body of Christ. There was no such teaching from Christ or the apostles or Paul as a Christian who was not part of the Body of Christ, who was not the Church, the Bride. ALL Christians were the Bride, the Church, the Body of Christ.



Peace again to you.

Wait, now you think that the rulers in Heaven will not be Christians? What?! Just when I think I've heard it all.

Of course not. Perhaps your question was less than clear?


If one is not a Christian reigning in the Kingdom, then one is a non-Christian (not reigning in the Kingdom).

Are intentionally trying to be confusing? I guess I have to be SUPER simple in my questions.

You asked what a person is called who is NOT 'a Christian that is going to be a king and priest'.

How else am I supposed to answer that other than 'a non-Christian?' How in the world did you get 'rulers in heaven will not be Christians' from that?

I suggest you consider rewriting your question to make it more clear.

Will there be Christians who will live forever on the Earth? Yes or no.

Living and reigning upon the earth.

Remember, the New Jerusalem (the Bride), comes down out of heaven from God.

The one who is victorious I will make a pillar in the temple of my God. Never again will they leave it. I will write on them the name of my God and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from my God; and I will also write on them my new name. Rev 3:12


I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband. Rev 21:2



Not her 'influence' only. She, herself.


Peace again to you.

[tam]

Peace again to you,

Peace to you,

Peace to you,

[Replying to tam in post #96]

If you don't like the fact there will be Christian going to heaven to be rulers over other Christians

It has nothing to do with 'like' or 'dislike'; it has to do with the fact that your claim is untrue.

I hate to burst your bubble.

I don't think my bubble is the one to be burst here...

Isaiah 32:1, 2 is clearly part of a Messianic prophecy and describes the benefits rendered by such “princes” under the Kingdom rule.

See, a king will reign in righteousness
and rulers will rule with justice.


Isaiah speaks of there being a king and rulers. Something I have certainly never argued against.

What the verse does not say is that Christians will reign over other Christians.

Compare Heb 2:5, 8, "For it is not to angels that he has subjected the inhabited earth to come, about which we are speaking." BTW Paul wrote that.

Regardless of who wrote Hebrews (not Paul, but it doesn't matter), Hebrews says nothing about Christians reigning over other Christians.


Peace again to you.

Yeah because apparently you believe that it will non-Christians that will reign over Christians.

Since I already refuted that erroneous conclusion, this post is disingenuous. Perhaps it is a deflection to hide the fact that the verses you used clearly do not support the claim that you have made - that Christians reign over other Christians.


Peace still to you.

[2timothy316]

Will there be Christians who will live forever on the Earth? Yes or no.

Living and reigning upon the earth.

Remember, the New Jerusalem (the Bride), comes down out of heaven from God.

The one who is victorious I will make a pillar in the temple of my God. Never again will they leave it. I will write on them the name of my God and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from my God; and I will also write on them my new name. Rev 3:12


I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband. Rev 21:2



Not her 'influence' only. She, herself.


Peace again to you.

I don't see a yes or no here.

So I'll try again.

Will there be Christians who will live forever on the Earth? Yes or no.

[2timothy316]

Peace again to you,

Peace to you,

Peace to you,

[Replying to tam in post #96]

If you don't like the fact there will be Christian going to heaven to be rulers over other Christians

It has nothing to do with 'like' or 'dislike'; it has to do with the fact that your claim is untrue.

I hate to burst your bubble.

I don't think my bubble is the one to be burst here...

Isaiah 32:1, 2 is clearly part of a Messianic prophecy and describes the benefits rendered by such “princes” under the Kingdom rule.

See, a king will reign in righteousness
and rulers will rule with justice.


Isaiah speaks of there being a king and rulers. Something I have certainly never argued against.

What the verse does not say is that Christians will reign over other Christians.

Compare Heb 2:5, 8, "For it is not to angels that he has subjected the inhabited earth to come, about which we are speaking." BTW Paul wrote that.

Regardless of who wrote Hebrews (not Paul, but it doesn't matter), Hebrews says nothing about Christians reigning over other Christians.


Peace again to you.

Yeah because apparently you believe that it will non-Christians that will reign over Christians.

Since I already refuted that erroneous conclusion, this post is disingenuous. Perhaps it is a deflection to hide the fact that the verses you used clearly do not support the claim that you have made - that Christians reign over other Christians.


Peace still to you.

I find this post disingenuous. I am starting to wonder if you know what a Christian even is.