Hosea 5:15

[placebofactor]

[JehovahsWitness]

[placebofactor]

[placebofactor]

[JehovahsWitness]

[placebofactor]

[JehovahsWitness]

. So if the Jews (us) were revived "two thousand years after being struck" ...would that not be 2,000 years after May of 31 A.D? Or would the Jews ("us") be revived two thousand years after another date? (If so, what would that alternative date be?)

I'm done!

A very wise decision on your part. If an idea cannot explained simply and clearly there is a good chance it is not accurate.

It should not take 12 POSTS to squeeze ... "Two thousand years from the time Isreal experienced A to the year XX XX when Israel experienced B "

If you could have filled in the BLANKS above you'd have saved us both a lot of time


JW

[placebofactor]

. So if the Jews (us) were revived "two thousand years after being struck" ...would that not be 2,000 years after May of 31 A.D? Or would the Jews ("us") be revived two thousand years after another date? (If so, what would that alternative date be?)

I'm done!

A very wise decision on your part. If an idea cannot explained simply and clearly there is a good chance it is not accurate.

It should not take 12 POSTS to squeeze ... "Two thousand years from the time Isreal experienced A to the year XX XX when Israel experienced B "

If you could have filled in the BLANKS above you'd have saved us both a lot of time


JW

If you would have read post 20, you would not have waisted my time!

[onewithhim]

. So if the Jews (us) were revived "two thousand years after being struck" ...would that not be 2,000 years after May of 31 A.D? Or would the Jews ("us") be revived two thousand years after another date? (If so, what would that alternative date be?)

I'm done!

A very wise decision on your part. If an idea cannot explained simply and clearly there is a good chance it is not accurate.

It should not take 12 POSTS to squeeze ... "Two thousand years from the time Isreal experienced A to the year XX XX when Israel experienced B "

If you could have filled in the BLANKS above you'd have saved us both a lot of time


JW

If you would have read post 20, you would not have waisted my time!

I read post #20 and I don't see how it contradicts what JehovahsWitness has said. Could you answer the question in their last post?

[JehovahsWitness]

It should not take 12 POSTS to squeeze ... "Two thousand years from the time Isreal experienced [ A ] to the year [XX XX] when Israel experienced [ B ] "

....

If you would have read post 20 {snip} ...

I did read the post and it does not contain the above statement or anything like it. Starting point for named subject/ ending point for same subject, in one sentence. How hard would that have been?

[placebofactor]

It should not take 12 POSTS to squeeze ... "Two thousand years from the time Isreal experienced [ A ] to the year [XX XX] when Israel experienced [ B ] "

....

If you would have read post 20 {snip} ...

I did read the post and it does not contain the above statement or anything like it. Starting point for named subject/ ending point for same subject, in one sentence. How hard would that have been?

I knew it, if you had ever studied the subject in detail, you would have known it.