Spear of Longinus

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
vanillamoon
Student
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 1:21 am

Spear of Longinus

Post #1

Post by vanillamoon »

Okay, there's a thread here about the shroud of Turin. But there's also some 'holy relic' that claims to fit into the whol Jesus story, that's around today. But I don't think it could possibly be from that time either. But I thought maybe there should be a thread about this relic too. So is it authentic, or is it something Hitler whipped up?

User avatar
hannahjoy
Apprentice
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Location: Greenville, SC

Post #2

Post by hannahjoy »

What source did you get this from? I've never heard of any "Spear of Longinus" and it's hard to discuss it if I don't know what you're discussing :-s.
"Bearing shame and scoffing rude,
In my place condemned He stood;
Sealed my pardon with His blood;
Hallelujah! What a Saviour!"
- Philip P. Bliss, 1838-1876

User avatar
ST88
Site Supporter
Posts: 1785
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 11:38 pm
Location: San Diego

Post #3

Post by ST88 »

hannahjoy wrote:What source did you get this from? I've never heard of any "Spear of Longinus" and it's hard to discuss it if I don't know what you're discussing :-s.
The Spear of Longinus (also called the Spear of Destiny) is kind of an extra-biblical legend. According to some historians, the Roman centurion who stabbed Jesus to make sure he was dead was named Longinus, and the blood and water that spilled out actually spilled onto him, altering him (failing eyesight before & could afterwards see, etc.). Longinus supposedly became a holy man after this, and is a bigger figure in the Orthodox Church than in the West.

The spear itself has a long and convoluted history. And although the spearhead that currently is on display in a museum in Austria has never been authenticated as the spear that pierced Jesus's side, it was nevertheless coveted by various figures throughout history as an icon. And, depending on which legend you believe, it could be in other places as well.

Further reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spear_of_Destiny
http://ourworld.cs.com/argentprime/spear.htm
http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/8303/spear.htm
http://sxws.com/charis/relics8.htm

vanillamoon
Student
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 1:21 am

Post #4

Post by vanillamoon »

I'm bumping this. I had heard in another thread (which typically I had forgotten which) where someone mentioned that there is no non-biblical proof whatsoever that Jesus even lived. I disagree.

People say that Jesus did not rise again and that's all fair and well if they say that. Understandable. But although the spear hasn't been authenticated it can still stand as a possible proof that Jesus did live. There are other non-biblical sources of Jesus' existance that I am probably forgetting.

User avatar
trencacloscas
Sage
Posts: 848
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:21 pm

Post #5

Post by trencacloscas »

But although the spear hasn't been authenticated it can still stand as a possible proof that Jesus did live.
One of the two facts should be proven before they can hold each other.
Sor Eucharist: I need to talk with you, Dr. House. Sister Augustine believes in things that aren’t real.
Dr. Gregory House: I thought that was a job requirement for you people.

(HOUSE MD. Season 1 Episode 5)

vanillamoon
Student
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 1:21 am

Post #6

Post by vanillamoon »

Why, yes it should. In fact, why doesn't someone authenticate it?

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Spear of Longinus

Post #7

Post by McCulloch »

vanillamoon wrote:Okay, there's a thread here about the shroud of Turin. But there's also some 'holy relic' that claims to fit into the whol Jesus story, that's around today. But I don't think it could possibly be from that time either. But I thought maybe there should be a thread about this relic too. So is it authentic, or is it something Hitler whipped up?
From the Catholic Encyclopedia
We read in the Gospel of St. John (xix, 34), that, after our Saviour's death, "one of the soldiers with a spear [lancea] opened his side and immediately there came out blood and water". Of the weapon thus sanctified nothing is known until the pilgrim St. Antoninus of Piancenza (A.D. 570), describing the holy places of Jerusalem, tells us that he saw in the basilica of Mount Sion "the crown of thorns with which Our Lord was crowned and the lance with which He was struck in the side".
I think that that dating removes the Spear of Longinus from the realm of historical evidence.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

User avatar
ENIGMA
Sage
Posts: 580
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 1:51 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post #8

Post by ENIGMA »

vanillamoon wrote:Why, yes it should. In fact, why doesn't someone authenticate it?
How would they? Do tell.
Gilt and Vetinari shared a look. It said: While I loathe you and all of your personal philosophy to a depth unplummable by any line, I will credit you at least with not being Crispin Horsefry [The big loud idiot in the room].

-Going Postal, Discworld

User avatar
The Nice Centurion
Guru
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:47 pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 107 times

Re:

Post #9

Post by The Nice Centurion »

First I have to tell that history knows not one but two spears of Longinus. Longinus must have had two spears. He supposedly must have stucked bis first spear into Jesus, yet it jammed, and therefore he used his second spear too. Longinus must have carried his reserve-spear attached to his back like a ninja and his Centurion must have been very Nice to allow that extravaganza.

SPEAR ONE was used in 996 by Otto III in his fight against magyars.

SPEAR TWO was unearthed through a miracle by holy men in besieged Antiochia during the first crusade.

http://www.thedevilslance.com/The-Holy-Lance.php
trencacloscas wrote: Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:27 am
But although the spear hasn't been authenticated it can still stand as a possible proof that Jesus did live.
One of the two facts should be proven before they can hold each other.
The Spear in Vienna has been authenticated as a carolingian wing lance. This is another miracle!

It is one thing to find out that Longinus carried two spears, but now we have proof that Longinus also owned a time machine.

Again: His Centurion must have been very Nice, for allowing a footsoldier to make time travels!
“If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. But if you drown a man in a fish pond, he will never have to go hungry again🐟

"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon❗"

"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates❗"

Post Reply