So what are prophecies then?

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
rikuoamero
Under Probation
Posts: 6707
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 2:06 pm
Been thanked: 4 times

So what are prophecies then?

Post #1

Post by rikuoamero »

Following on from my discussion on Micah 5, I was told the following by a Christian.
He only related the word of God to the Israelites. That's what Biblical prophecy is. Biblical prophecy is not prediction of the future, Riko. Open your mind. Forget about Nostradamus. LOL!
MICAH. DID. NOT. PREDICT. ANYTHING.
one more time -- Micah was not and is not predicting anything.
So I'd like to take this time and space to ask basically...what are biblical prophecies then (or what are called prophecies)? What exactly are they? Apparently, I was wrong in thinking they were foretellings of the future, descriptions of events yet to happen at the time of their writing, and that the fact they got it correct means they could only have been told by God.
Are there any other Christians on this website who agree with the above quotes? Or are Micah and other things listed by Christians as prophecies...predictions of the future?
Image

Your life is your own. Rise up and live it - Richard Rahl, Sword of Truth Book 6 "Faith of the Fallen"

I condemn all gods who dare demand my fealty, who won't look me in the face so's I know who it is I gotta fealty to. -- JoeyKnotHead

Some force seems to restrict me from buying into the apparent nonsense that others find so easy to buy into. Having no religious or supernatural beliefs of my own, I just call that force reason. -- Tired of the Nonsense

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #31

Post by marco »

PinSeeker wrote:

Well good! I'm happy for you. But, maybe one day you'll think back to the things you've said and laugh, too.

This is like a G&S Opera, HMS PInafore:
O joy O rapture unforeseen
The clouded sky is now serene,
The God of day, the orb of love
Has hung his ensign high above.... as I recall it from schooldays.


From schooldays too I recall my Latin master telling us that mistakes are a useful learning process. We learn from them rather than laugh at them. If I recapture the beliefs of my childhood I should imagine there will be a permanent smile on my face. Dread thought.
PinSeeker wrote:
Yes, I have had some good chuckles at many of the things I've seen in this forum (and not just from you, obviously). But my heart also goes out for you guys. And I mean that in all honesty.

Perhaps teaching the ignorant instead of laughing at them is the Christian thing to do. It may be that the quiet voice of truth is drowned out by our own laughter - be we believer or atheist.

If Jesus did not see himself as God, but as the VIP spoken about by sundry prophets, why should we in this advanced year think otherwise?
PinSeeker wrote:
Ah, but He most certainly did. Many times. We've had that conversation, several times over. The only two possibilities we're really left with are that He was either 1.) a complete lunatic, or 2.) He was (is) who He said He was (is) -- God, made man.
I see immediately there is the possibility of Christ being sane, but wrong in his ideas. There is evidence of that too. There is another possibility that people take the words of Christ and attach a meaning he never intended - and he retains his sanity. I don't know why you would wish to entertain only two possibilities.


Go well and may your God go with you.

User avatar
PinSeeker
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2920
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 1:07 pm
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Post #32

Post by PinSeeker »

marco wrote:From schooldays too I recall my Latin master telling us that mistakes are a useful learning process. We learn from them rather than laugh at them. If I recapture the beliefs of my childhood I should imagine there will be a permanent smile on my face. Dread thought.... Perhaps teaching the ignorant instead of laughing at them is the Christian thing to do. It may be that the quiet voice of truth is drowned out by our own laughter - be we believer or atheist.
The mistake you seem to be making, Marco, is taking my "merriment" personally, in the sense that I'm laughing at you, rather than merely at your comments. That's easy to do... I can understand that, but, well, it's not meant that way.

Too, describing it as "merriment" is a mischaracterization thereof; such is really not the case. Again, I chuckle at the comments I see, and not at the person, but it goes much further than that. To explain:

I pray for my children every day that they will never know a day when they didn't know Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior... for them, but also because I can't say that about myself. There was a day up until which I had the same -- or at least a similar, in many aspects -- outlook on God and Christ and the Bible as you and many others on this forum. Thanks be to God, those days are in the rear view mirror for me, but from time to time I look back at a lot of the things I thought and said... and I laugh -- sometimes in amusement, sometimes in regret, and sometimes even in pain. The point is, I was once where you are... or at least a quite similar place. But then, God... well, to put it Biblically, He redeemed my life from the pit (Job, the Psalms, et al.). He called me out of darkness and into His marvelous light. Because I deserved it? Most certainly not; I deserved just the opposite. But He did it, because, as the Bible says, it pleased Him to do so. Why? I have absolutely no idea. And so, there's a hopefulness in my "merriment," too, that God might do for you what He did for me. So there ya go.

As for the teaching comment, I agree with you on that, but that's exactly what I've been doing. Or trying to do, anyway; a teacher's job is immensely harder (if not impossible) when the hearer takes things personally, even though that's not the intent of the teacher. But I can't let myself be deterred; God is sovereign over all that.
marco wrote:If Jesus did not see himself as God, but as the VIP spoken about by sundry prophets, why should we in this advanced year think otherwise?
PinSeeker wrote:Ah, but He most certainly did. Many times. We've had that conversation, several times over. The only two possibilities we're really left with are that He was either 1.) a complete lunatic, or 2.) He was (is) who He said He was (is) -- God, made man.
I see immediately there is the possibility of Christ being sane, but wrong in his ideas. There is evidence of that too. There is another possibility that people take the words of Christ and attach a meaning he never intended - and he retains his sanity. I don't know why you would wish to entertain only two possibilities.
Ah, but His "ideas" are not really what we're talking about, here, is it, Marco? No, the immediate context here was Jesus claiming to be God, which He did many times over. Forget about whether you believe Him or not; if a person claims to be God, those are really the only two alternatives. Either he (or she) is nuts, or he (she) is who he (she) says he (she) is.
marco wrote:Go well and may your God go with you.
Well thanks. But my God has promised to never leave or forsake me, so I don't have to worry about His going with me. I do have to make sure that I always go with Him, though. But I hope the same for you.

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #33

Post by marco »

PinSeeker wrote:

The mistake you seem to be making, Marco, is taking my "merriment" personally, in the sense that I'm laughing at you, rather than merely at your comments. That's easy to do... I can understand that, but, well, it's not meant that way.

Then perhaps the fault is with the instruments of your expression rather than the intention behind what you say.
PinSeeker wrote:
There was a day up until which I had the same -- or at least a similar, in many aspects -- outlook on God and Christ and the Bible as you and many others on this forum. Thanks be to God, those days are in the rear view mirror for me, but from time to time I look back at a lot of the things I thought and said... and I laugh -- sometimes in amusement, sometimes in regret, and sometimes even in pain. The point is, I was once where you are... or at least a quite similar place. But then, God... well, to put it Biblically, He redeemed my life from the pit

Then if you have attained the certainty that others might perhaps crave, that was your fatted calf moment and doubtless justifies jubilation. It is good you have identified this as private rejoicing in your own epiphany rather than perhaps schadenfreude. One would otherwise be reminded of the verse:



" The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. "

PinSeeker wrote:
As for the teaching comment, I agree with you on that, but that's exactly what I've been doing. Or trying to do, anyway; a teacher's job is immensely harder (if not impossible) when the hearer takes things personally, even though that's not the intent of the teacher. But I can't let myself be deterred; God is sovereign over all that.
The teacher learns from his students and adjusts his lessons accordingly. If the teacher hears only his own voice, never that of a student, then he is not a good teacher. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
PinSeeker wrote:
No, the immediate context here was Jesus claiming to be God, which He did many times over. Forget about whether you believe Him or not; if a person claims to be God, those are really the only two alternatives. Either he (or she) is nuts, or he (she) is who he (she) says he (she) is.

The words you think illustrate a claim to deity are subject to interpretation; they are never: "I am God." Yours is a deduction, and I am saying it is an erroneous deduction. Like other very sincere and obviously good people here, you have a personal conviction and in many respects you are to be envied. Your arguments are easy to forumlate and your assistant has impressive weight. The feeble cry of "non credo" hardly touches the armour, and perhaps there is reason for laughter. But the publican, in his miserable manner, does occasionally merit a hearing, however brief. I think Jesus suggested so.

User avatar
PinSeeker
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2920
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 1:07 pm
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Post #34

Post by PinSeeker »


User avatar
bluethread
Savant
Posts: 9129
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:10 pm

Re: So what are prophecies then?

Post #35

Post by bluethread »

brunumb wrote: [Replying to post 4 by bluethread]
When a Prophet makes a statement regarding a future event, it is presumed that such a statement has the approval of said deity. If what is stated does not come to pass, that shows that the person is not speaking on behalf of an actual deity.
Brilliant strategy. Heads I win, tails you lose.
I don't see that. If what the Prophet says regarding the future does not come to pass, not only are they not speaking for Adonai, but they are also subject to capital punishment. So, for the prophet, it is heads I live, tales I die.

User avatar
rikuoamero
Under Probation
Posts: 6707
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 2:06 pm
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: So what are prophecies then?

Post #36

Post by rikuoamero »

bluethread wrote:
brunumb wrote: [Replying to post 4 by bluethread]
When a Prophet makes a statement regarding a future event, it is presumed that such a statement has the approval of said deity. If what is stated does not come to pass, that shows that the person is not speaking on behalf of an actual deity.
Brilliant strategy. Heads I win, tails you lose.
I don't see that. If what the Prophet says regarding the future does not come to pass, not only are they not speaking for Adonai, but they are also subject to capital punishment. So, for the prophet, it is heads I live, tales I die.
Two words.
Jehovah's Witnesses.

(Just to be explicitly clear, I am not saying that JWs kill or ought to kill fake prophets. Just that they have a strong tendency for those who make predictions to slide right on by when (not if) those predictions are not shown to come about. Most famous being the prediction of Christ's return in 1914, which was later reinterpreted as being him returning in a spiritual sense)
Image

Your life is your own. Rise up and live it - Richard Rahl, Sword of Truth Book 6 "Faith of the Fallen"

I condemn all gods who dare demand my fealty, who won't look me in the face so's I know who it is I gotta fealty to. -- JoeyKnotHead

Some force seems to restrict me from buying into the apparent nonsense that others find so easy to buy into. Having no religious or supernatural beliefs of my own, I just call that force reason. -- Tired of the Nonsense

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10046
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1239 times
Been thanked: 1622 times

Re: So what are prophecies then?

Post #37

Post by Clownboat »

PinSeeker wrote:
rikuoamero wrote:
1. things that had already happened (even long before).
2. things that were taking place at the time of the prophet(s) speaking.
3. things that -- relative to where those prophets and the original hearers were standing in linear time -- were (and maybe still are) yet to take place.

The overall takeaway (among others) in all these things -- regardless what category above (1, 2, or 3) any particular prophecy fell/falls into -- is that God is always in control of all things, and that He alone is worthy of our trust and devotion regardless of what comes to pass, and that He works all things together for the good of those who love Him and are called according to His purpose. And that in the end, He will redeem His creation unto Himself. Jesus wins. And we (Christians, anyway), by being in Him, win, too; we are co-heirs with Christ. This... is the Gospel.
Holy monkey butts! That is your takeaway?!? Seriously?

"Look at this prophecy, it could be explanation 1, 2 or 3, which means that god is in control of all things...".

How is this even close to being logical, rational thought? How is this different then reading Humpty Dumpty and then claiming a god is in control of all things? Both statements arrive at the conclusion that you desire, but hopefully you can see why your thinking is completely nonsensical.

You sir, would make for a great Muslim!
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10046
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1239 times
Been thanked: 1622 times

Post #38

Post by Clownboat »

Pinseeker wrote:As for the teaching comment, I agree with you on that, but that's exactly what I've been doing. Or trying to do, anyway;
Matthew 23:8
8 But do not be called Rabbi (Teacher); for One is your Teacher, and you are all [equally] brothers.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

User avatar
PinSeeker
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2920
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 1:07 pm
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Re: So what are prophecies then?

Post #39

Post by PinSeeker »

Clownboat wrote:
PinSeeker wrote:
rikuoamero wrote:
1. things that had already happened (even long before).
2. things that were taking place at the time of the prophet(s) speaking.
3. things that -- relative to where those prophets and the original hearers were standing in linear time -- were (and maybe still are) yet to take place.

The overall takeaway (among others) in all these things -- regardless what category above (1, 2, or 3) any particular prophecy fell/falls into -- is that God is always in control of all things, and that He alone is worthy of our trust and devotion regardless of what comes to pass, and that He works all things together for the good of those who love Him and are called according to His purpose. And that in the end, He will redeem His creation unto Himself. Jesus wins. And we (Christians, anyway), by being in Him, win, too; we are co-heirs with Christ. This... is the Gospel.
Holy monkey butts! That is your takeaway?!? Seriously?

"Look at this prophecy, it could be explanation 1, 2 or 3, which means that god is in control of all things...".

How is this even close to being logical, rational thought? How is this different then reading Humpty Dumpty and then claiming a god is in control of all things? Both statements arrive at the conclusion that you desire, but hopefully you can see why your thinking is completely nonsensical.

You sir, would make for a great Muslim!
Ohhhhhhh, boy. I see Clownboat is stalking me again and taking what I said completely out of context. Oh, well. At least he got the sir thing right...

User avatar
PinSeeker
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2920
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 1:07 pm
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Post #40

Post by PinSeeker »


Post Reply