What is the Biblical view of hell?

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20745
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 206 times
Been thanked: 355 times
Contact:

What is the Biblical view of hell?

Post #1

Post by otseng »

SallyF wrote: The concept of Hell is one of the many unmarketable, embarrassingly unbelievable religious concepts that has been recently swept under the altar in the severely diluted quasi-belief system that passes for Christianity in certain circles.
Divine Insight wrote: In fact, I think this is why Christianity invented eternal punishment in hell. They started to realize that just plain dying wouldn't be compelling. So instead they invented the concept of "Everlasting Punishment" for those who refuse to comply.
Questions for debate:
What is the Biblical view of hell?
What concepts do we have of hell that are not in the Bible?

User avatar
PinSeeker
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2920
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 1:07 pm
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Post #291

Post by PinSeeker »

tam wrote:if I share something I learned from my Lord, then I cannot call it my opinion.
Call it what you will. If you say annihilationism is something you learned from the Lord, I say you are mistaken.

As an aside, if you want to be really correct about it, Jesus does not teach Scripture – at least directly speaking – to those who have lived since Pentecost (Acts 2). Teaching is actually the Holy Spirit’s role (1 Corinthians 2:10-16). But I digress.

Back to the discussion at hand, you want evidence. Well, this is not an exhaustive list, but should be more than sufficient:
  • • Clearly, what we read in Matthew 25 and Luke 16 – directly from the mouth of our Lord – refutes the cessation of existence of the wicked. You surely will agree that we cannot hear and or understand Mark 9 or Isaiah 66 in ignorance of or isolation from Matthew 25 or Luke 16.

    • We must also read Luke 23 in light of Matthew 25 (especially, as those on His left will be sent away rather than exterminated) and Luke 16. As Jesus is on the cross at Calvary, He says to the thief on His right, “Truly I say to you, today you shall be with Me in Paradise.� He says nothing to the thief on His left, but His silence cannot be interpreted as “you will not exist anymore,� but rather, “you will be somewhere other than Paradise.�

    • In Revelation 19, immediately after the coming of Christ, we read of the doom of the Beast and False Prophet (Satan) – they were thrown alive into the lake of fire which burns with brimstone. Then in Revelation 20, we again see the coming of Christ and His execution of the Judgment, and verse 10 specifically states that the Beast and False Prophet, having been thrown into the lake of fire and brimstone, are tormented day and night forever and ever. In 20:11-15, all whose names are not found in the book of life follow Satan and are thrown into the same lake of fire. Their punishment is exactly the same – the second death is consignment to hell, the final abode of the wicked – and by direct inference, they also are tormented day and night forever and ever (20:15). This is the second death (20:14). The second death is spiritual in character, and accompanies bodily resurrection (John 5:29).
So, we agree that Isaiah 66:24 and Mark 9:42-48 are eschatological pronouncements of God's judgment upon the wicked... but specifically regarding these two passages, the fire is not literal, but rather symbolic of God’s judgment, which is never-ending -- “not quenched� -- for the wicked. Likewise, the worm… “their worm,� which signifies ownership… symbolizes their torment and resulting anguish, which also is never-ending -- “does not die.� And to have a torment/anguish that does not end, he or she must still have a conscious existence -- shown graphically by Jesus in Luke 16. Likewise, to suffer punishment for eternity, one must likewise have a conscious existence, as alluded to in Matthew 25. It’s a terrible thing to contemplate, but it’s true.

You may still disagree with that, and probably do. That should be okay with both of us at this point; we should be able to agree to disagree. As such, we can maintain our fellowship and love for one another in Christ, and I resolve to do those things and urge you to do likewise.

At any rate, I’m sure we can agree that God’s judgment is a fearsome thing and is to be avoided above all else. And to do that, we need Jesus. Thanks be to God, Who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.

Now. No offense to you or anyone else, but this has turned into, really, fruitless discussion. In other words, the Gospel is not being advanced, and neither you nor I nor anyone else involved here is furthering the administration of God which is by faith (1 Timothy 1). It has really turned into empty chatter, which is to be avoided lest it lead to further ungodliness (1 Timothy 2). Therefore, I’m withdrawing gracefully.

Grace and peace to you in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22726
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 890 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Contact:

Post #292

Post by JehovahsWitness »

[Replying to post 291 by PinSeeker]

Would it not be better to reference chapter and verse as this enables others to respond withn precision?

*notably which verses in Matthew 25, Mark 9 and Luke 23?






RELATED POSTS


house (Matthew ). An "evil slave" who mistreat his fellow slaves is punished with being assigned a place with hypocrite ( .

Matthew 8:12 Luke 13:28 , Mat 13:42 , 50, Mat 22:13; 24:51; 25:30 : Does the bible say the dead " gnash their teeth"
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 21#p971121

Are Jesus words at Matthew 26:24 (Mark 9:42) evidence of a torturous afterlife?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 65#p971265

Luke 16:22-30 : Does the parable of The Rich man and Lazarus teach us about life beyond the grave?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 77#p971077

Luke 9:30 Is the TRANSFIGURATION an example of dead people communicating with the living?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 23#p970023

Jude 1:7; Isaiah 66:24 ; Is FIRE really a symbol of after death torture ?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 47#p970947

Revelation 1:18, 6:8, Revelation 20:13, & 14 : What does the book of Revelation teach us about "HELL" ?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 39#p971239

HEBREW SCRIPTURES

Does Numbers16:32, 33 indicate SHEOL is a literal pit/hole in the ground ?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 24#p970124

Is 2 Samuel 22:6 an example of the word "sheol" being used as a literal location?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 17#p970917

Is the account of THE WITCH OF ENDOR (1 Sam 28:15) an example of a dead person speaking?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 20#p970420

Does the Psalms 9:17 reference to sheol, imply the wicked had a prehuman existence?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 15#p970115

Isaiah 66:24 ; Jude 1:7 Is FIRE really a symbol of after death torture ?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 47#p970947

Is Isaiah 14:9-11 biblical proof that the dead can speak?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 12#p970412

Last edited by JehovahsWitness on Sat Dec 24, 2022 4:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
THIS YEAR JEHOVAH'S WITNSESS COMMEMORATE THE DEATH OF CHRIST ON 12 APRIL 2025

Image
https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/memorial/

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #293

Post by marco »

ttruscott wrote:
Since punishment implies overt causation of suffering rather than natural suffering self caused by one's choices I think you might be making a mistake.

First, the verse refers to Judas alone and is therefore not necessarily applicable to the general public as all inclusive doctrine.

This might be a good point were it not for a very similar verse that does apply in general:


"Woe to the world for the causes of sin. These stumbling blocks must come, but woe to the man through whom they come!" Matthew 18:7
ttruscott wrote:
Second, There is no specific indication that the suffering felt is not all mental, that is, as spirits they do not have bodies to be used cruelly. This would imply that the state of mind, their memories of the past failures and wrong decisions that ended them in this state along with their original hatred and frustration at being helpless would add up to a feeling of being tormented.

We are in metaphysical territory and it's rather pointless to speculate what punishment means in a dimension we know nothing about. Suffice to say it causes "woe."
Your speculation on why and how is as good as anyone else's.

RightReason
Under Probation
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sat May 20, 2017 6:26 pm
Been thanked: 16 times

Post #294

Post by RightReason »

[Replying to post 277 by otseng]
The best that can be said for one's position is if it's Biblical. If all of scripture harmonizes with one's view, then one can say it's a Biblical position. But, as we have witnessed so far, interpretations depend on how much one takes passages literally or symbolically.
Yes, but doesn’t this then logically show how/why we cannot simply rely on the Bible, indicating that couldn’t be what Jesus expected in the first place?

This very thread and conversation demonstrate our primary effort should be in determining who has the right/authority to interpret the Bible. So, it really doesn’t simply come down to, “What does the Bible say?� because as we have proven, that can differ.

It also is reasonable to consider who compiled the Bible? This Bible that we are all now using as support/evidence. Why do we accept the Bible in the first place? In doing so, we are accepting the authority of the Catholic Church. Perhaps, since she gave it to us, we ought to listen to what she has to say about it. Just a thought.

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22726
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 890 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Contact:

Post #295

Post by JehovahsWitness »

PinSeeker wrote:We do read that even the dead will praise and confess Jesus to God's glory (Philippians 2:10-11).
Yes but do we read they will do it while they are still dead?


JW
THIS YEAR JEHOVAH'S WITNSESS COMMEMORATE THE DEATH OF CHRIST ON 12 APRIL 2025

Image
https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/memorial/

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22726
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 890 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Contact:

Post #296

Post by JehovahsWitness »

otseng wrote:

While we're on the subject of soul and body, here is a verse that indicates humans have two separate components: body and soul.
[Mat 10:28 KJV] 28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
I think you may be reading too much into the verse. Jesus did not say humans "have" "two separate components: body and soul" he implies at least two things exist, "body" exists and "souls" exist. He did not say whether one can exist without the other, he did not say If one could survive the death of the other, he said only God could kill both.
otseng wrote:
Man could be tripartite with a body, soul, and spirit, but it's not completely relevant to the debate.
How convenient to declare the spirit irrelevant to a discussion on the fate of the dead. Whether a person has a SPIRIT and a SOUL and what these words mean is essential to the discussion since it seems to me it is one of these two things that some contend is caused agony after a person dies/ survives the decomposition of the physical body.

otseng wrote:
I believe the soul can exist when the body is dead.
I cannot imagine you can support this belief with scripture without defining your terms, but you are welcome to try should you so desire.

otseng wrote:
I would only claim man is at a minimum bipartiate and has a physical component (body) and an immaterial component (soul).
Is there a scriptural reason you consider a SOUL "immaterial"?




JW
Last edited by JehovahsWitness on Tue Jul 16, 2019 3:57 pm, edited 8 times in total.
THIS YEAR JEHOVAH'S WITNSESS COMMEMORATE THE DEATH OF CHRIST ON 12 APRIL 2025

Image
https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/memorial/

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #297

Post by marco »

JehovahsWitness wrote:

Yes but do we read they will do it while they are still dead?



If they do it when they are NOT dead, then the statement is wrong. "The dead will do it" does not say "the now living will do it." At some point it is prudent to abandon a wrong belief rather than clutch at semantic straws.

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22726
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 890 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Contact:

Post #298

Post by JehovahsWitness »

marco wrote:
JehovahsWitness wrote:

Yes but do we read they will do it while they are still dead?



If they do it when they are NOT dead, then the statement is wrong....
Not If "the dead" are classified as "all people who have experienced death/have died at some point in time".



JW
Last edited by JehovahsWitness on Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
THIS YEAR JEHOVAH'S WITNSESS COMMEMORATE THE DEATH OF CHRIST ON 12 APRIL 2025

Image
https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/memorial/

User avatar
Imprecise Interrupt
Apprentice
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri May 31, 2019 8:33 am

Post #299

Post by Imprecise Interrupt »

JehovahsWitness wrote:
PinSeeker wrote:We do read that even the dead will praise and confess Jesus to God's glory (Philippians 2:10-11).
Yes but do we read they will do it while they are still dead?
This passage does raise a problem.

Philippians 2:10 so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,

Paul often refers to the dead as ‘asleep’, so obviously they would not do any knee bending at the present time. On the other hand, the righteous will be resurrected and go up to meet Jesus. They will not be under the earth when they are awake and able to bend knees.

Paul makes little mention of the fate of the unrighteous. This is the only reference I can find and it is very unclear.
Romans 2:9 There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil

Even if one interprets this as referring to conscious punishment of the evil doer after the day of judgment, it seems odd to expect them to be doing any knee bending in honor of Jesus.

If one wishes to treat this as literal, I do not see how to reconcile it with Pauline concepts expressed elsewhere. Perhaps it should be considered poetic instead, referring to the ‘three worlds’ imagery of mythology (also used in the scriptures), and simply emphasizing just how exalted Jesus really is.

In short, IMO Philippians 2 is not really relevant to the Topic under discussion.

User avatar
tam
Savant
Posts: 6522
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 360 times
Been thanked: 331 times
Contact:

Post #300

Post by tam »

Peace to you Marco!
tam wrote:
Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed by that fire and are no more. That is what is serving as an example of those who sustain the punishment of eternal fire.
Invisiblity offers a bad example, Tam. I visited a former concentration camp in Poland and though it was long out of use, the horror remained before our eyes. Do we spare a thought for the fabled Atlantis, any more than Sodom or for Ur?

Go well
Yes, the reminder of the horror that occurred in that place remains as an example... but the actual horror is not ongoing.




Peace to you.

Post Reply